Journals / Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2025 / Volume: 35 Issue: 4

The Usage of Tea Factory Waste as Soil Substrate for the Production of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

Arzu Karataş(Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Horticulture)0000-0002-2895-571X
Hatice Filiz Boyacı(Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Horticulture)0000-0002-3799-4673
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-12-25
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

All findings revealed that the T4 medium containing equal parts soil and tea waste created the best results, except for the growth medium containing the farmyard.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Intensive use of inorganic chemicals in agriculture causes soil inefficiency.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study investigated the potential for utilizing the large amount of waste generated during tea processing in tea factories every year in snap bean cultivation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:All findings revealed that the T4 medium containing equal parts soil and tea waste created the best results, except for the growth medium containing the farmyard.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sustainable agriculture · Plant growth · Yield

Abstract

Intensive use of inorganic chemicals in agriculture causes soil inefficiency. Alternative sources are needed to ensure the sustainability of agriculture. Utilizing organic wastes presents a feasible solution as they can support plant growth while ensuring their elimination. This study investigated the potential for utilizing the large amount of waste generated during tea processing in tea factories every year in snap bean cultivation. The effects of tea factory waste mixed into the soil at four different rates were compared to the soil and the soil to which farmyard manure was added. The study was conducted in pots. The experiment was designed with three replications according to randomized complete blocks. The effects of the growth media were determined using 26 parameters related to plant development and yield. Observations made 30 days after seed sowing and at the end of harvest revealed that tea factory waste treatments made significant contributions to plant height, stem diameter, and the number of trifoliate leaves compared to soil, which had no added organic matter. However, the SPAD values were negatively affected. All findings revealed that the T4 medium containing equal parts soil and tea waste created the best results, except for the growth medium containing the farmyard. In conclusion, it was found that tea factory waste can be a beneficial organic matter for the growth and development of snap bean plants. To maximize its usefulness as a new source, promoting the populations of fungal and bacterial agents that facilitate its rapid decomposition in the soil is necessary.

🔖

Cite This Article

Karataş, A., Boyacı, H. F. (2025). The Usage of Tea Factory Waste as Soil Substrate for the Production of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 35 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.1672948

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (39)

  1. Alaboz, P., Dengiz, O., Pacci, S., Demir, S., & Türkay, C. (2022). Determination of the effect of different organic fertilizers applications on soil quality using the SMAF model. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 32(1), 21-32.
  2. AOAC, (1999). Official methods of analysis (16th Ed.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Arlington. V. A. USA.
  3. Çirka, M., Altuner, F., Eryiğit, T., Oral, E., & Bildirici, N. (2022). Effects of vermicompost applications on some yield and yield properties of wheat. MAS Journal of Applied Sciences, 7(1), 146-156.
  4. Debnath, B., Haldar, D., & Purkait, M. K. (2021). Potential and sustainable utilization of tea waste: A review on present status and future trends. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 9(5), 106179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.106179
  5. dos Santos Sousa, W., Soratto, R. P., Peixoto, D. S., Campos, T. S., Da Silva, M. B., Souza, A. G. V.,. & Gitari, H. I. (2022). Effects of Rhizobium inoculum compared with mineral nitrogen fertilizer on nodulation and seed yield of common bean. A meta-analysis. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 42(3), 52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00784-6
  6. Engin, Y. Ö., Yağmur, B., Cirik, S., Okur, B., Eşiyok, D., & Gökpınar, Ş. (2019). The potential use of macroalgae Ulva rigida (C. Agardh) as organic matter source in common bean production. Acta Aquatica Turcica, 15(2), 151-162. (In Turkish) https://doi.org/10.22392/actaquatr.577506
  7. Garg, J., & Rakshit, A. (2024). Compost Tea: An Emerging Nature-Based Supplement Strengthening Options for Durable Agriculture. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 24, 8075–8098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-024-02100-5
  8. Karataş, A. (2022). Effects of different agro-industrial waste as substrates on proximate composition, metals, and mineral contents of oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus). International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 57(3), 1429-1439.
  9. Karataş, A. (2024). Is Tea Waste A Promising Co-substrate for Optimizing The Cultivation, Growth, and Yield of Charleston Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)?. Research in Agricultural Sciences, 55(3), 183-192. https://doi.org/10.17097/agricultureatauni.1516367
  10. Karavidas, I., Ntatsi, G., Vougeleka, V., Karkanis, A., Ntanasi, T., Saitanis, C.,. & Savvas, D. (2022). Agronomic practices to increase the yield and quality of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): A systematic review. Agronomy, 12(2), 271. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12020271
  11. Khan, M. A. I., Ueno, K., Horimoto, S., Komai, F., Tanaka, K., & Ono, Y. (2009). Physicochemical, including spectroscopic, and biological analyses during composting of green tea waste and rice bran. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 45, 305-313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-008-0335-x
  12. Koul, B., Yakoob, M., & Shah, M. P. (2022). Agricultural waste management strategies for environmental sustainability. Environmental Research, 206, 112285. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.envres.2021.112285
  13. Kumar, V., Bhat, S. A., Kumar, S., Verma, P., Badruddin, I. A., Américo-Pinheiro, J. H. P.,. & Atabani, A. E. (2023). Tea byproducts biorefinery for bioenergy recovery and value-added products development: A step towards environmental sustainability. Fuel, 350, 128811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128811
  14. Kumari, S., Kumar, V., Kothari, R., & Kumar, P. (2022). Effect of supplementing biochar obtained from different wastes on biochemical and yield response of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): An experimental study. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, 43, 102432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2022.102432
  15. Mahaly, M., Senthilkumar, A. K., Arumugam, S., Kaliyaperumal, C., & Karupannan, N. (2018). Vermicomposting of distillery sludge waste with tea leaf residues. Sustainable Environment Research, 28(5), 223-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serj.2018.02.002
  16. Morales-Corts, M. R., Pérez-Sánchez, R., & Gómez-Sánchez, M. Á. (2018). Efficiency of garden waste compost teas on tomato growth and its suppressiveness against soilborne pathogens. Scientia Agricola, 75(5), 400-409. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-992X-2016-0439
  17. Negi, T., Kumar, Y., Sirohi, R., Singh, S., Tarafdar, A., Pareek, S.,. & Sagar, N. A. (2022). Advances in bioconversion of spent tea leaves to value-added products. Bioresource Technology, 346, 126409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126409
  18. Oğuz, A., & Boyacı, H. F. (2025). Agronomic potential and limitations of factory-derived tea waste in kale cultivation under drought stress. Agronomy, 15(11), 2478. https://doi.org/10.3390/ agronomy15112478
  19. Peksen, A., & Yakupoglu, G. (2009). Tea waste as a supplement for the cultivation of Ganoderma lucidum. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 25, 611-618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-008-9931-z
  20. Priya, E., Sarkar, S., & Maji, P. K. (2024). A review on slow-release fertilizer: Nutrient release mechanism and agricultural sustainability. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 12(4), 113211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2024.113211
  21. Raguraj, S., Kasim, S., & Amali, R. K. A. (2025). Re-utilization of factory tea waste as a potential biostimulant on the early growth and nutrient uptake of tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) nursery plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167. 2025.2465589
  22. Rahimi, A., Gitari, H., Lyons, G., Heydarzadeh, S., Tunçtürk, M., & Tunçtürk, R. (2023). Effects of vermicompost, compost and animal manure on vegetative growth, physiological and antioxidant activity characteristics of Thymus vulgaris L. under water stress. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 33(1), 40-53.
  23. Seth, D., Athparia, M., Singh, A., Rathore, D., Venkatramanan, V., Channashettar, V.,. & Kataki, R. (2023). Sustainable environmental practices of tea waste—a comprehensive review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 32, 7449–7467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-30848-3
  24. Singh, R., Hochmuth, R. C., de Sá Leitao, D. A. H., & Sharma, L. K. (2024). Nitrogen Fertilization in Snap Bean Following a Legume in the Sandy Soils of North Florida. HortTechnology, 34(5), 521-532. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH05442-24
  25. Turgut, B., & Köse, B. (2016). Improvements in aggregate stability of sediments supplemented with tea waste and farmyard manure. Spanish Journal of Soil Science: SJSS, 6(2), 98-106. https://doi.org/10.3232/SJSS.2016.V6.N2.02
  26. Wang, C., Luo, D., Zhang, X., Huang, R., Cao, Y., Liu, G.,. & Wang, H. (2022). Biochar-based slow-release of fertilizers for sustainable agriculture: A mini review. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 10, 100167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2022.100167
  27. Wang, Z., Ahmad, W., Zhu, A., Zhao, S., Ouyang, Q., & Chen, Q. (2024). Recent advances review in tea waste: High-value applications, processing technology, and value-added products. Science of the Total Environment, 174225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174225
  28. Xiong, D., Chen, J., Yu, T., Gao, W., Ling, X., Li, Y.,. & Huang, J. (2015). SPAD-based leaf nitrogen estimation is impacted by environmental factors and crop leaf characteristics. Scientific reports, 5, 13389. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13389
  29. Yağmur, B., & Okur, B. (2017). The effect of farmyard manure compost and sulphur applications on the growth of bean on a limely-alkali soil. Soil Water Journal, 6, 13-25. https://doi.org/10.21657/topraksu.338302
  30. Yazici, K., (2025). Tea from A to Z (In Turkish). Ankara, Türkiye, Iksad Publishing House, 790.
  31. Yuan, M., Ruark, M. D., & Bland, W. L. (2017). A simple model for snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) development, growth and yield in response to nitrogen. Field Crops Research, 211, 125-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.06.014
  32. Zaine, M. Z., Shah, M. N. A., & Juan, D. (2023). Performance Study of Tea Waste as Nutrient Rich Organic Fertilisers. Borneo Engineering & Advanced Multidisciplinary International Journal, 2(Special Issue (TECHON 2023)), 116-121.
  33. dos Santos Sousa, W., Soratto, R. P., Peixoto, D. S., Campos, T. S., Da Silva, M. B., Souza, A. G. V.,. & Gitari, H. I. (2022). Effects of Rhizobium inoculum compared with mineral nitrogen fertilizer on nodulation and seed yield of common bean. A meta-analysis. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 42(3), 52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00784-6
  34. Karavidas, I., Ntatsi, G., Vougeleka, V., Karkanis, A., Ntanasi, T., Saitanis, C.,. & Savvas, D. (2022). Agronomic practices to increase the yield and quality of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): A systematic review. Agronomy, 12(2), 271. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12020271
  35. Kumar, V., Bhat, S. A., Kumar, S., Verma, P., Badruddin, I. A., Américo-Pinheiro, J. H. P.,. & Atabani, A. E. (2023). Tea byproducts biorefinery for bioenergy recovery and value-added products development: A step towards environmental sustainability. Fuel, 350, 128811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128811
  36. Negi, T., Kumar, Y., Sirohi, R., Singh, S., Tarafdar, A., Pareek, S.,. & Sagar, N. A. (2022). Advances in bioconversion of spent tea leaves to value-added products. Bioresource Technology, 346, 126409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126409
  37. Seth, D., Athparia, M., Singh, A., Rathore, D., Venkatramanan, V., Channashettar, V.,. & Kataki, R. (2023). Sustainable environmental practices of tea waste—a comprehensive review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 32, 7449–7467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-30848-3
  38. Wang, C., Luo, D., Zhang, X., Huang, R., Cao, Y., Liu, G.,. & Wang, H. (2022). Biochar-based slow-release of fertilizers for sustainable agriculture: A mini review. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 10, 100167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2022.100167
  39. Xiong, D., Chen, J., Yu, T., Gao, W., Ling, X., Li, Y.,. & Huang, J. (2015). SPAD-based leaf nitrogen estimation is impacted by environmental factors and crop leaf characteristics. Scientific reports, 5, 13389. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13389