SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Avrasya Etüdleri / 2026 / Sayı: 66

COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF THE BELT AND ROAD INITIATIVE AND COUNTERMEASURES: THE UNITED STATES, PARTNERSHIP FOR GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE AND INVESTMENT AND OTHER ALLIANCES

Furkan Vefa Kurt(HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-9473-7246
Pages
75–106
Publication Date
2026-10-23
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, such alliances and other partnerships between nations are examined because of their relevance with the Chinese rise and relations between Washington and Beijing.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to determine whether the United States and its foreign policy towards China are capable of reversing the enlarging influence of China within the Asian continent and on global scale through the Belt and Road Initiative and economic statecraft.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this respect, alternative initiatives such as the B3W and the PGII are investigated based on their reach and international inclusiveness to obtain a comparative result.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, such alliances and other partnerships between nations are examined because of their relevance with the Chinese rise and relations between Washington and Beijing.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Belt and Road Initiative · Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment · Chinese rise

Abstract

This study aims to determine whether the United States and its foreign policy towards China are capable of reversing the enlarging influence of China within the Asian continent and on global scale through the Belt and Road Initiative and economic statecraft. In this respect, alternative initiatives such as the B3W and the PGII are investigated based on their reach and international inclusiveness to obtain a comparative result. Further, additional alliances and partnerships such as the Quad and the AUKUS along with regional ones targeting Beijing and its increasing capabilities, are also assessed. In this context, the effectiveness of countering policies and initiatives are presented. In this context, the BRI and its reach are detailly analysed in order to make a comparison with alternative infrastructure projects. Accordingly, designs under main initiatives are included such as the main BRI corridors and the PGII constructions. Responsive policies of the United States which target China and its rise are provided and their effectiveness is assessed. Standing of the European nations and their attitude towards the Chinese initiatives are other impactful drivers included. In addition, regional tensions particularly in Asia are also influential regarding distinct approaches of various countries. Quadrilateral Security Dialogue and the AUKUS also play an important role based on hard power mechanisms which put them in a different position from the infrastructural projects and initiatives. Therefore, such alliances and other partnerships between nations are examined because of their relevance with the Chinese rise and relations between Washington and Beijing.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kurt, F. V. (2026). COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF THE BELT AND ROAD INITIATIVE AND COUNTERMEASURES: THE UNITED STATES, PARTNERSHIP FOR GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE AND INVESTMENT AND OTHER ALLIANCES. Avrasya Etüdleri, Sayı: 66, 75–106. https://ajindex.com/articles/1666026

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (60)

  1. Ali, Syed Raghab, Abbas Rashid Butt, and Sapna Mumtaz. BRI Axis: Emerging Powers Shaping the New World Order. 2, no. 4 (2024).
  2. Ali, Yasir, and Shaista, Tabassum. “Countering Connectivity: US Response to China’s Belt and Road Initiative.” 5, no. 2 (2025).
  3. ASEAN Secretariat. Master Plan on ASEAN Connectivity 2025. Association of Southeast Asian Nations, 2016.
  4. Ashbee, Edward. “The Blue Dot Network, Economic Power, and China’s Belt & Road Initiative.” 48, no. 2 (2021): 133–49.
  5. Asian Development Bank. Meeting Asia’s Infrastructure Needs. Asian Development Bank, 2017.
  6. Aurangzeb, Mr Muneeb, Syed Shuja Uddin, Muhammad Irfan, Zubaida Aziz, and Muhammad Riaz Sadiq. “Challenging the Liberal Order: A Neo-Realist Analysis of China’s Belt & Road Initiative and US Strategic Counter-Initiatives.” 4, no. 1 (2025): 107–17.
  7. Beeson, Mark. “Geoeconomics with Chinese Characteristics: The BRI and China’s Evolving Grand Strategy.” 6, no. 3 (2018): 240–56.
  8. Brookings Center. Belt and Road Initiative: China-Middle East Cooperation in an Age of Geopolitical Turbulence. Doha, Qatar, 2019.
  9. Butt, Dr. Ahtasham Jan, Dr Artan Latif, and Sjjad. Haider. “United States’ Containment Policy: A Strategic Competition between US and China in the Perspective of BRI vs. B3W.”. 12, no. 2 (2023): 46–55.
  10. Casagrande, Sara., and Bruno Dallago. “Mapping China’s Belt and Road Initiative in Europe: Developments and Challenges.” 13, no. 10 (2025): 301.
  11. China Power. “How Is the Belt and Road Initiative Advancing China’s Interests?” Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2017.
  12. European Union Network and Information Systems. Cybersecurity of 5G Networks—EU Toolbox of Risk Mitigating Measures. CG Publication, 2020.
  13. Farooq, Muhammad Sabil, Nazia Feroze, Jin Jing, Cheng Tongshun, and Faisal Feroze. “Implications of China’s Road Construction to Iran via Afghanistan: Opportunities and Challenges for Regional Connectivity and Trade Development.” 2026.
  14. Ferchen, Matt. ASEAN to Become World’s Fourth Largest Economy by 2030: Singapore PM Lee. 2022.
  15. Forough, Mohammadbagher, and Anna Fünfgeld. “The Empty Signifier of ‘Connectivity’: How Infrastructure Reorders the World.” 32, no. 5 (2025): 1593-1617. Hannah, Harrison I. “The Great Game Moves to the Sea: Tripolar Competition in the Indian Ocean Region.” 2019.
  16. Hassan, Abid, and Syed Hammah Ali. “Evolving US Indo-Pacific Posture and Strategic Competition with China.” 22, no. 1 (2025): 61–89.
  17. He, Kai, and Huiyun Feng. “The Positive Externalities of US–China Institutional Balancing in the Indo-Pacific.” 101, no. 1 (2025): 35–52.
  18. Holslag, Jonathan. “Explaining Economic Frictions between China and the European Union.” In Responding to China’s Rise: US and EU Strategies”. 2015, 131–50.
  19. Huang, Jiali. “A Comparative Analysis of China’s New Era Economic Diplomacy and the Economic Diplomacy Strategy of the Biden Administration.” 2, no. 2 (2025): 126–31.
  20. International Energy Agency. Africa Energy Outlook 2022. IEA, 2022.
  21. Khan, Arif., and Shah Nawaz Khan. “BRI vs. B3W: A Rivalry for Economic Hegemony: Archival Research.” 61, no. 1 (2022): 31–44.
  22. Kratz, Agatha, Max J. Zenglein, Gregor Sebastian, and Mark Witzke. EV Battery Investments Cushion Drop to Decade Low: Chinese FDI in Europe 2022 Update. (Berlin:), 2023.
  23. Ferchen, Matt. ASEAN to Become World’s Fourth Largest Economy by 2030: Singapore PM Lee. 2022. Forough, Mohammadbagher, and Anna Fünfgeld. “The Empty Signifier of ‘Connectivity’: How Infrastructure Reorders the World.” 32, no. 5 (2025): 1593-1617.
  24. Hannah, Harrison I. “The Great Game Moves to the Sea: Tripolar Competition in the Indian Ocean Region.” 2019.
  25. Holslag, Jonathan. “Explaining Economic Frictions between China and the European Union.” In Responding to China’s Rise: US and EU Strategies". 2015, 131–50.
  26. Kumar, Pankaj, and Amar Bahadur Shukla. “Maritime Security Challenges in South Asia: India’s Concern Against the String of Pearls Policy.” 2026.
  27. Lopez, Grace A. A. Jimenez. “Sino-Peruvian Cooperation in Maritime Exports: Analyzing Mega Port of Chancay.” 2024.
  28. Majeed, Gulshan, Muhammad. Riaz Khan, and Amber Butt. “A Sino-US Strategic Competition in the Indian Ocean Region: A Critical Analysis.” 5, no. 1 (2025): 28–28.
  29. Mariani, Bernardo. The Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment (PGII) and the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI): Meeting the World’s Infrastructure Gaps amid Geopolitical Competition. 2023. Masina, Pietro. Challenging the Belt and Road Initiative: The American and European Alternatives. (Florence:), 2022.
  30. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China. “Foreign Ministry Responds to G7’s New Infrastructure Initiative.” 2022.
  31. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China. Global Development Initiative Implementation Progress Report 2023. Beijing, 2023.
  32. Mustikasari, Sonia. “Myanmar Agreement in Signing the China-Myanmar Economic Corridor (CMEC) Project.” 6, no. 2 (2026).
  33. National Maritime Foundation. Indo-Pacific Report 2019: Indo-Pacific Partnership—Realising the Benefits of Economic and Maritime Cooperation. National Maritime Foundation, 2019.
  34. Noorali, Hassan, Qiuomars. Yazdanpanah Dero, and Hossein Noorali. “The Consensus of Material and Discursive Geopolitical Codes to Contain China in the Indo-Pacific.” 42, no. 1 (2025): 39–60.
  35. People’s Daily. “The CPC First Proposed the ‘Community of Shared Future for Mankind’ Advocating Peace, Development, and Common Prosperity.” 2012.
  36. Quah, Euston, Jun Rui Tan, and Iuldashov Nursultan. “A Comparative Analysis of the Belt and Road Initiative with Other Global and Regional Infrastructure Initiatives: Prospects and Challenges.” 18, no. 6 (2025): 338.
  37. Rahman, Ashiqur. “The Digital Silk Road: A Strategic Initiative in China’s Multifaceted Superpower Quest.” 33, no. 3 (2025): 1–21.
  38. Rahman, Khalid. “Law, Connectivity, and Global Governance: The Belt and Road Initiative and the Reconfiguration of International Economic Order.” 22, no. 2 (2025): 53–72.
  39. Rana, Pradumna Bickram. “G7’s ‘Build Back Better World’: Rival to China’s BRI?” 2021, 109–21.
  40. Runde, Daniel F. Enabling a Better Offer: How Does the West Counter Belt and Road? (Washington, DC:), 2024.
  41. Shakibi Nejad, Mohammad. International Trade Law and Economic Sovereignty: Theoretical Foundations and the Influence of NIEO/UNCTAD Frameworks. 2026.
  42. Simonov, Mykyta. “The Belt and Road Initiative and Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment: Comparison and Current Status.” 5, no. 1 (2025).
  43. State Council of the People’s Republic of China. “China Has Signed Cooperation Documents on Co-Building the ‘Belt and Road’ with 152 Countries and 32 International Organizations.” 2023.
  44. State Council of the People’s Republic of China. “Three Ministries Jointly Release the Vision and Actions for Promoting the Co-Building of the ‘Belt and Road.” 2015.
  45. The White House. “Fact Sheet: Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment at the G7 Summit.” 2023.
  46. The White House. “Fact Sheet: President Biden and G7 Leaders Launch Build Back Better World (B3W) Partnership.” 2021.
  47. The White House. “Memorandum on the Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment.” 2022. Tillman, Henry, Jian Yang, and Egill Thor Nielsson. “The Polar Silk Road: China’s New Frontier of International Cooperation.” 4, no. 3 (2018): 345-362.
  48. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. A Study of ICT Connectivity for the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI): Enhancing the Collaboration in China-Central Asia Corridor. United Nations, 2017.
  49. Urban, Waltraut. China’s Belt and Road Initiative Revisited. 66 (2025).
  50. U.S. Department of State. “Blue Dot Network.” 2019.
  51. U.S. Department of State. “Fact Sheet: Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity.” 2022.
  52. Williams, Joe, and James Duminy. “Connecting through Infrastructure.” In Global Development and Environment,. (Bristol:), 2025, 130-144.
  53. Woldearegay, Tewodros, Maru Mathewos Erbeto, Dereje Fikre Jima and Solomon Nigussie Worku. “Examining the Geoeconomic Implications of China’s Belt and Road Initiative for US Preeminence in the Horn of Africa.” 10, no. 4 (2025): 391-410.
  54. Xinhua News Agency. “Belt and Road’ Incorporated into CPC Constitution.”. 2017.
  55. Xinhua News Agency. “Chronology of China’s Belt and Road Initiative.” 2016.
  56. Xinhua News Agency. “The Concept of a Community of Shared Future for Mankind Written into Three UNGA First Committee Resolutions.” 2022.
  57. Xinhua News Agency. “Xi Jinping Proposes the Global Development Initiative.” 2021.
  58. Yeo, Yukyung. “Competitive Infrastructure Investment Diffusion: Emulating and Learning from China.” 32, no. 4 (2025): 1002–26.
  59. Yu, Hong. “G7’s Plan for Partnership for Global Infrastructure and Investment: An Alternative to the BRI?” In Understanding China’s Belt and Road Initiative,. (Singapore:), 2024, 141-151.
  60. Zhao, Minghao. “The Belt and Road Initiative and China–US Strategic Competition.” 3, no. 2 (2021): 248-260.