Journals / Journal of Research in Economics / 2026 / Volume: 10 Issue: 2

GEOPOLITICAL ALIGNMENT AND CENTRAL BANK GOLD ACCUMULATION: EVIDENCE OF CONCENTRATION, NOT COORDINATION

Tuğba Ortay Baykal(ISTANBUL COMMERCE UNIVERSITY)0009-0001-1414-2523
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-10-20
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Contrary to theoretical expectations and policy discourse surrounding de-dollarisation, geopolitical alignment does not systematically predict central bank gold purchases; these purchases instead reflect sanctions-specific hedging by a small number of directly affected states and broad-based portfolio diversification across the geopolitical spectrum.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In theory, gold is the natural hedge against geopolitical risk: it has no issuer, carries no counterparty risk, and cannot be frozen by foreign authorities when held domestically.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Yet central bank gold accumulation is extraordinarily concentrated: Russia, China, and Türkiye account for over 100% of net purchases since 2002, while the remaining countries are net sellers in aggregate.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Contrary to theoretical expectations and policy discourse surrounding de-dollarisation, geopolitical alignment does not systematically predict central bank gold purchases; these purchases instead reflect sanctions-specific hedging by a small number of directly affected states and broad-based portfolio diversification across the geopolitical spectrum.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2002 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Gold reserves · Central banks · De-dollarisation

Abstract

In theory, gold is the natural hedge against geopolitical risk: it has no issuer, carries no counterparty risk, and cannot be frozen by foreign authorities when held domestically. Countries more exposed to confrontation with the United States should therefore be expected to accumulate more gold. Yet central bank gold accumulation is extraordinarily concentrated: Russia, China, and Türkiye account for over 100% of net purchases since 2002, while the remaining countries are net sellers in aggregate. This study employs Bailey-Strezhnev-Voeten ideal point estimates for 129 countries over the period 2002 to 2024 to test whether United Nations General Assembly voting distance from the United States predicts gold accumulation. A panel data framework with year fixed effects and country-clustered standard errors is estimated, controlling for BRICS/SCO membership, sanctions exposure, reserve levels, inflation, and GDP growth. The coefficient on UN voting distance is not statistically significant once BRICS/SCO membership and sanctions are controlled for (p = 0.85), nor when only BRICS/ SCO membership is controlled for (p = 0.41). When the three largest accumulators are excluded, the effect attains only marginal significance (p = 0.09). Robustness checks, including two-way fixed effects, sub-period analysis, and falsification tests using total reserves as a placebo outcome, confirm the fragility of this relationship. In the post-2022 period, NATO members, particularly Poland, emerged as leading purchasers, accumulating 559 tonnes compared with 392 tonnes by BRICS/SCO countries. The principal contribution is therefore a null result. Contrary to theoretical expectations and policy discourse surrounding de-dollarisation, geopolitical alignment does not systematically predict central bank gold purchases; these purchases instead reflect sanctions-specific hedging by a small number of directly affected states and broad-based portfolio diversification across the geopolitical spectrum.

🔖

Cite This Article

Baykal, T. O. (2026). GEOPOLITICAL ALIGNMENT AND CENTRAL BANK GOLD ACCUMULATION: EVIDENCE OF CONCENTRATION, NOT COORDINATION. Journal of Research in Economics, Volume: 10 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.29228/JORE.56

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (25)

  1. Arslanalp, S., Eichengreen, B. and Simpson-Bell, C. (2022). The Stealth Erosion of Dollar Dominance: Active Diversifiers and the Rise of Nontraditional Reserve Currencies. IMF Working Paper, WP/22/58, Washington, DC.
  2. Arslanalp, S., Eichengreen, B. and Simpson-Bell, C. (2023). Gold as International Reserves: A Barbarous Relic No More? Journal of International Economics, 145: 103822.
  3. Auboin, M. (2012). Use of Currencies in International Trade: Any Changes in the Picture? WTO Staff Working Paper, ERSD-2012-10, Geneva.
  4. Bailey, M. A., Strezhnev, A. and Voeten, E. (2017). Estimating Dynamic State Preferences from United Nations Voting Data. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 61(2): 430-456.
  5. Bastanifar, I., Khan, K. H. and Koch, H. (2025a). Understanding BRICSIZATION Through an Economic Geopolitical Model. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 11: 100440.
  6. Bastanifar, I., Khan, K. H. and Nazari, R. (2025b). Currency Without Credibility: Why BRICS De- dollarization Falls Short? China Accounting and Finance Review, 28(2): 186-205.
  7. Boz, E., Casas, C., Georgiadis, G., Gopinath, G., Le Mezo, H., Mehl, A. and Nguyen, T. (2020). Patterns in Invoicing Currency in Global Trade. IMF Working Paper, WP/20/126, Washington, DC.
  8. Brüggen, A., Habib, M. M., Gomis, R. and Vallin, A. (2025). Gold Demand: The Role of the Official Sector and Geopolitics. Box in The International Role of the Euro, June 2025. Frankfurt: European Central Bank.
  9. Caldara, D. and Iacoviello, M. (2022). Measuring Geopolitical Risk. American Economic Review, 112(4): 1194-1225.
  10. Chinn, M. D. and Ito, H. (2006). What Matters for Financial Development? Capital Controls, Institutions, and Interactions. Journal of Development Economics, 81(1): 163-192.
  11. Eichengreen, B. and Flandreau, M. (2016). A Century and a Half of Central Banks, International Reserves and International Currencies. In M. D. Bordo, Ø. Eitrheim, M. Flandreau and J. F. Qvigstad (Eds.), Central Banks at a Crossroads: What Can We Learn from History? (pp. 280-318). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  12. Goldberg, L. S. and Hannaoui, O. (2024). Drivers of Dollar Share in Foreign Exchange Reserves. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports, No. 1087, New York.
  13. Gopinath, G. and Stein, J. C. (2021). Banking, Trade, and the Making of a Dominant Currency. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 136(2): 783-830.
  14. Iancu, A., Anderson, G., Ando, S., Boswell, E., Gamba, A., Hakobyan, S., … Wu, Y. (2020). Reserve Currencies in an Evolving International Monetary System. IMF Departmental Paper, No. 2020/002, Washington, DC.
  15. Ito, H. and McCauley, R. N. (2020). Currency Composition of Foreign Exchange Reserves. Journal of International Money and Finance, 102: 102104.
  16. Koziuk, V. (2022). Drivers of Gold Fraction in Global Exchange Reserves. Journal of European Economy, 21(2): 137-153.
  17. Liao, S. and McDowell, D. (2016). No Reservations: International Order and Demand for the Renminbi as a Reserve Currency. International Studies Quarterly, 60(2): 272-293.
  18. Liu, Z., Zhang, J., Gu, R., Hu, Q. and He, S. (2025). Driving Effects of U.S. Monetary Policy and Geopolitical Risks on Gold Reserve Share. International Review of Financial Analysis, 105: 104391.
  19. McDowell, D. (2020). Financial Sanctions and Political Risk in the International Currency System. Review of International Political Economy, 28(3): 635-661.
  20. McGuire, P., von Peter, G. and Zhu, S. (2024). International Finance Through the Lens of BIS Statistics: The Global Reach of Currencies. BIS Quarterly Review, June: 1-16.
  21. Ngo, V. M., Nguyen, P. V. and Hoang, Y. H. (2024). The Impacts of Geopolitical Risks on Gold, Oil and Financial Reserve Management. Resources Policy, 90: 104688.
  22. Pradhan, S.-K., Prasad, E., Takats, E. and Temesvary, J. (2026). Dollarisation Waves: New Evidence from a Comprehensive International Bond Database. BIS Papers, No. 165, Basel.
  23. Shaik, M., Jamil, S. A., Hawaldar, I. T., Sahabuddin, M., Rabbani, M. R. and Atif, M. (2023). Impact of Geo- political Risk on Stocks, Oil, and Gold Returns During GFC, COVID-19, and Russian-Ukraine War. Cogent Economics and Finance, 11(1): 2190213.
  24. Triki, M. B. and Ben Maatoug, A. (2021). The GOLD Market as a Safe Haven Against the Stock Market Uncertainty: Evidence from Geopolitical Risk. Resources Policy, 70: 101872.
  25. Weiss, C. (2025). De-Dollarization? Diversification? Exploring Central Bank Gold Purchases and the Dollar’s Role in International Reserves. International Finance Discussion Papers, No. 1420, Washington, DC.