Journals / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2018 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3

Confounders for Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Admission of Neonates Born to Mothers Who Had Preeclampsia

Pages
162–166
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSION: Gestational age at delivery and the birth weight are the main risk factors for neonatal intensive care unit admission of neonates born to mothers who had preeclampsia.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of some maternal and neonatal clinical parameters on the neonatal intensive care unit admission rates of neonates born to mothers who had preeclampsia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:STUDY DESIGN: Study included 402 singleton pregnant women with preeclampsia who admitted to Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit of Zeynep Kamil Children and Women’s Health Training and Research Hospital.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSION: Gestational age at delivery and the birth weight are the main risk factors for neonatal intensive care unit admission of neonates born to mothers who had preeclampsia.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of some maternal and neonatal clinical parameters on the neonatal intensive care unit admission rates of neonates born to mothers who had preeclampsia. STUDY DESIGN: Study included 402 singleton pregnant women with preeclampsia who admitted to Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit of Zeynep Kamil Children and Women’s Health Training and Research Hospital. Pregnancies with uterine rupture, chorioamnionitis and congenital malformations were excluded. Some maternal and neonatal clinical characteristics were assessed to predict neonatal intensive care unit admission. RESULTS: Among 402 neonates, 140 (35%) of them had an indication for neonatal intensive care unit admission, among 140 neonates, 136 (97%) of them were preterm neonates. Comparison of groups with and without neonatal intensive care unit admission indicated significant differences between groups in terms of gestational age, Apgar scores at 1st and 5th minutes, birth weight, some maternal laboratory parameters (Hemoglobin, hematocrit, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, albumin). In multivariate analysis, among all study population, gestational age at delivery, birth weight and Apgar scores were found to be significantly associated with neonatal intensive care unit admission. On the other hand, in subgroup of term neonates, none of the variables was shown to be associated with neonatal intensive care unit admission. CONCLUSION: Gestational age at delivery and the birth weight are the main risk factors for neonatal intensive care unit admission of neonates born to mothers who had preeclampsia.

🔖

Cite This Article

KILICCI, C., ABIDE, C. Y., OZKAYA, E., ERGEN, E. B., YENIDEDE, I., BAKSU, N. B., KARAKUS, R., KUCUKOGLU, S. (2018). Confounders for Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Admission of Neonates Born to Mothers Who Had Preeclampsia. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3, 162–166. https://ajindex.com/articles/166076

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Alkiaat A, Hutchinson M, Jacques A, Sharp MJ, Dickinson MJ. Evaluation of the frequency and obstetric risk factors associated with term neonatal admissions to special care units. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynecol 2013 Jun;53(3):277-82
  2. Grey JE, McCormick MC, Richardson DK, Ringer S. Normal birth weight intensive care unit survivors: outcome assessment Pediatrics 1996;97(6 Pt 1):832-8
  3. Sibai BN, Caritis SN, Thom E, Klebanoff M, McNellis D, Rocco L, et al. Prevention of preeclampsia with low-dose aspirin in health. Nulliparous pregnant women. N Engl J Med 1993;329(17):1213-8
  4. Levine RJ, Hauth JC, Curet LB, Sibai BM, Catalano PM, Morris CD, et al. Trial of calcium to prevent preeclampsia. N Engl J Med 1997;337(2):69-76
  5. Walker JJ. Preeclampsia. Lancet 2000;356(9237):1260-5
  6. Roberts JM, Cooper DW. Pathogenesis and genetics of preeclampsia. Lancet 2001;357(9249):53-6
  7. Girsen AI, Greenberg MB, El-Sayed YY, Lee H, Carvalho B, Lyell DJ. Magnesium sulfate exposure and neonatal intensive care unit admission at term. J Perinatol 2015 Mar;35(3):181-5
  8. Costantine MM, Weiner SJ; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Effects of antenatal exposure to magnesium sulfate on neuroprotection and mortality in preterm infants: a metaanalysis. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114(2 Pt 1):354-64
  9. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Obstetrics and gynecology 2013;122(5):1122-31
  10. Habli M, Levine RJ, Qian C, Sibai B. Neonatal outcomes in pregnancies with preeclampsia or gestational hypertension and in normotensive pregnancies that delivered at 35, 36, or 37 weeks of gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007 Oct;197(4): 406.e1-7
  11. Zenzmaier C, Leitner H, Brezinka C, Oberaigner W, König-Bachmann M. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after induction of labor: a population-based study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017 May;295(5):1175-83
  12. Baud D, Rouiller S, Hohlfeld P, Tolsa JF, Vial Y. Adverse obstetrical and neonatal outcomes in elective and medically indicated inductions of labor at term. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013;26(16):1595-601
  13. Wilson AL, Munson DP, Schubot DB, Leonardson G, Stevens DC. Does prenatal care decrease the incidence and cost of neonatal intensive care admissions? Am J Perinatol 1992 Jul;9(4):281-4
  14. Quinn CE, Sivas