SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Haseki Tıp Bülteni / 2019 / Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 1

Who Sets Light to the Scientific Path of Spine? Publication Rates of the Abstracts Presented at the “North American Spine Society” Meetings

Omurga Bilimine Kim Işık Tutuyor? “North American Spine Society”Kongrelerinde Sunulan Bildiri Özetlerinin Yayınlanma Oranı

EMEL ECE ÖZCAN EKŞİ
MURAT ŞAKİR EKŞİ
Pages
63–68
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Further research is needed to understand the reasons for some presented abstracts that could not have been published in scientific journals.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Publication rate of congress abstracts has gained attention in the recent literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Our aim was to assess publication rate and the reasons behind publication of abstracts presented at North American Spine Society (NASS) 2009-2012 annual scientific meetings.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Further research is needed to understand the reasons for some presented abstracts that could not have been published in scientific journals.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2009-2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Publication rate of congress abstracts has gained attention in the recent literature. Our aim was to assess publication rate and the reasons behind publication of abstracts presented at North American Spine Society (NASS) 2009-2012 annual scientific meetings. Methods: We evaluated the abstracts presented at the NASS 2009- 2012 annual scientific meetings. We searched abstract titles and author names through the PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar. Author specialty, origin of the abstract, journal name, time to publication (years) and content change were looked for. Results: The publication rate of the abstracts presented at NASS 2009- 2012 was 48%. The 2011 congress was the most successful one at reaching publication compared to other three years. Oral presentation abstracts were more likely to be published than poster abstracts, except the year 2011. Orthopedic surgery was the leading specialty in the number of presented abstracts (70%), while neurosurgery was the most successful specialty in seeing publication of the presented abstracts (58%). Conclusion: The publication rate of presented abstracts of NASS has increased compared to the previous years. Further research is needed to understand the reasons for some presented abstracts that could not have been published in scientific journals.

Özet

Amaç: Kongre bildiri özetlerinin yayın olma oranı literatürde son dönemlerde ilgi çekmektedir. Bu çalışmada amacımız “North American Spine Society”de (NASS) 2009-2012 yıllık bilimsel kongrelerinde sunulmuş bildiri özetlerinin yayın olma oranını ve bu oran üzerine etkisi olabilecek faktörleri saptamaktır. Yöntemler: NASS 2009-2012 yıllık bilimsel kongrelerinin bildiri özeti kitapçıklarını taradık. Bildiri özeti başlıkları ve yazar isimleri “PubMed/ MEDLINE” ve “Google Scholar” arama motorları kullanılarak tarandı. Öncelikle, yazarların uzmanlık alanı ve bildiri özetinin nereden gönderildiği kaydedildi. Sonra, her bilimsel makale haline gelmiş olan bildiri özetinin yayınladığı derginin ismi, sunumdan yayına kadar geçen süre (yıl olarak) ve yayının içerik değişiklikleri incelendi. Bulgular: NASS 2009-2012 yıllık bilimsel kongrelerinde sunulmuş bildiri özetlerinin bilimsel makale olarak yayınlanma oranı %48 idi. Bilimsel makale olarak yayınlanma oranı en yüksek olan 2011 yılında sunulmuş bildiri özetleriydi. Sözel olarak sunulmuş bildiri özetlerinin yayınlanma oranı elektronik poster olarak sunulmuş bildiri özetlerinin yayınlanma oranına göre 2011 yılı dışında anlamlı olarak daha yüksekti. Ortopedi ve travmatoloji bölümü NASS 2009-2012 yıllarındaki bildiri özetlerinin %70’ini sunarken, nöroşirurji bölümü sunduğu bildiri özetlerinin %58’ini bilimsel makale haline getirdi. Sonuç: NASS yıllık bilimsel kongrelerinde sunulan bildiri özetlerinin bilimsel makale olarak yayınlanma oranı eskiye oranla yükselmiştir. Sunulmak üzere kabul edilmiş ancak bilimsel makale olarak yayınlanamamış olan çalışmaların yayınlanamama nedenlerini anlamak için daha ileri araştırmalar gerekmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

EKŞİ, E. E. Ö., EKŞİ, M. Ş. (2019). Who Sets Light to the Scientific Path of Spine? Publication Rates of the Abstracts Presented at the “North American Spine Society” Meetings. Haseki Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 1, 63–68. https://ajindex.com/articles/165890

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Patel AJ, Cherian J, Fox BD, et al. Publication patterns of oral and poster presentations at the annual meetings of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons and the American Association of Neurological Surgeons. J Neurosurg 2011;115:1258-61.
  2. Wang JC, Yoo S, Delamarter RB. The publication rates of presentations at major Spine Specialty Society meetings (NASS, SRS, ISSLS). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999;24:425-7.
  3. Byerly WG, Rheney CC, Connelly JF, et al. Publication rates of abstracts from two pharmacy meetings. Ann Pharmacother 2000;34:1123-7.
  4. Daluiski A, Kuhns CA, Jackson KR, et al. Publication rate of abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society. J Orthop Res 1998;16:645-9.
  5. Hoag CC, Elterman DS, Macneily AE. Abstracts presented at the American Urological Association Annual Meeting: determinants of subsequent peer reviewed publication. J Urol 2006;176:2624-9; discussion 9. Jasko JJ, Wood JH, Schwartz HS. Publication rates of abstracts presented at annual musculoskeletal tumor society meetings. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003:98-103.
  6. Meissner A, Delouya G, Marcovitch D, et al. Publication rates of abstracts presented at the 2007 and 2010 Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology meetings. Curr Oncol 2014;21:e250-4. Preston CF, Bhandari M, Fulkerson E, et al. Podium versus poster publication rates at the Orthopaedic Trauma Association. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005:260-4.
  7. Roy D, Sankar V, Hughes JP, et al. Publication rates of scientific papers presented at the Otorhinolarygological Research Society meetings. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2001;26:253-6.
  8. Yentis SM, Campbell FA, Lerman J. Publication of abstracts presented at anaesthesia meetings. Can J Anaesth 1993;40:632-4.
  9. Eksi MS, Kaplan SC, Yilmaz B, et al. Publication Rates of Presentations at Annual Scientific Meetings of the Turkish Neurosurgical Society. Turk Neurosurg 2017;27:142-5.
  10. Kleine-Konig MT, Schulte TL, Gosheger G, Rödl R, Schiedel FM. Publication rate of abstracts presented at European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society Annual Meetings, 2006 to 2008. J Pediatr Orthop 2014;34:e33-8. Janssen T, Bartels R, Lind B, Villas Tome C, Vleggeert-Lankamp CL. Publication rate of paper and podium presentations from the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society Annual Meeting. Eur Spine J 2016;25:2311-6.
  11. Schulte TL, Huck K, Osada N, et al. Publication rate of abstracts presented at the Annual Congress of the Spine Society of Europe (years 2000-2003). Eur Spine J 2012;21:2105-12.