SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Narrative And Language Studies / 2026 / Cilt: 3 Sayı: 4

Complex Fusion of Virtues and Faults: Shakespeare’s Antony as a ‘Manliest’ Man

Fehmi Turgut(Karadeniz Technical University, Senior Lecturer in the Shakespearean Drama, Turkey)
Öznur Yemez(Selçuk University & Karadeniz Technical University, Member of European Shakespeare Research Association, Turkey)
Pages
17–29
Publication Date
2016-07-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, arguing that Mark Antony who can be praised or attacked remains questionable, this paper deals with the conflict between what Antony thinks about himself, what he does, and what the others think about him in order to demonstrate the multiplicity and complexity in his character.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra presents a rigorous challenge in terms of character analysis since the central characters of the play, Antony and Cleopatra, are not unified figures acting in accordance with a recognizable personality.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The characters’ complexity is enhanced by their limited action and reliable words.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, arguing that Mark Antony who can be praised or attacked remains questionable, this paper deals with the conflict between what Antony thinks about himself, what he does, and what the others think about him in order to demonstrate the multiplicity and complexity in his character.
🔬Design:Makale
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Antony and Cleopatra · multiplicity of character · manliness

Abstract

Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra presents a rigorous challenge in terms of character analysis since the central characters of the play, Antony and Cleopatra, are not unified figures acting in accordance with a recognizable personality. The characters’ complexity is enhanced by their limited action and reliable words. The words in the play are hardly trustworthy and the characters are too sophisticated to conceive as such making the interpretation of the characters more difficult. Thus, arguing that Mark Antony who can be praised or attacked remains questionable, this paper deals with the conflict between what Antony thinks about himself, what he does, and what the others think about him in order to demonstrate the multiplicity and complexity in his character.

🔖

Cite This Article

Turgut, F., Yemez, Ö. (2016). Complex Fusion of Virtues and Faults: Shakespeare’s Antony as a ‘Manliest’ Man. Narrative And Language Studies, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 4, 17–29. https://ajindex.com/articles/1657454

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Berek, Peter. “Doing and Undoing: The Value of Action in Antony and Cleopatra.” Shakespeare Quarterly, 32.3 (1982): 295-304.
  2. Brown. John Russell. A. C. Bradley on Shakespeare’s Tragedies. New York: Palgrave
  3. Macmillan, 2007, Print.
  4. Clark, S., ed. The New Century Shakespeare Handbook. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc. (1974).
  5. Dollimore J. “Antony and Cleopatra: Virtus under Erasure.” The Roman Plays. Ed. G. Holderness. London: Longman, (1996).
  6. Harrier, Richard C. “Cleopatra’s End.” Shakespeare Quarterly, 13.1 (1962): 63-65.
  7. Jones, Emrys., ed. Introduction. “Antony and Cleopatra.” William Shakespeare. London: Penguin, 1988.
  8. Kaula, David. “The Time Sense of Antony and Cleopatra.” Shakespeare Quarterly, 15.3 (1964): 211-223.
  9. Knight, Charles., ed. The Comedies, Histories, Tragedies and Poems of William Shakespeare (1852).
  10. Lymann, Dean B. “The Sewanee Review.” University of the South: (2007).
  11. Michael, Payne. “Erotic Irony and Polarity in Antony and Cleopatra.” Shakespeare Quarterly, 24.3 (1973): 265-279.
  12. Schwartz, Elias. “The Shackling of Accidents: Antony and Cleopatra.” College English, 23. 7 (1962): 550-558.
  13. Shakespeare, William. Antony and Cleopatra. The Complete Works of William Shakespeare. London: DKY Editions, 1990.
  14. Spevack, M., ed. A New Variorum Edition of William Shakespeare, Antony and Cleopatra. New York: The Modern Language Association, 1990.
  15. Wolf, William D. “New Heaven, New Earth”: The Escape from Mutability in Antony and Cleopatra.” Shakespeare Quarterly, 33.3 (1982): 328-335.