SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İlköğretim Online / 2026 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

Views of pre-service elementary teachers on the use of webquest in mathematics teaching

Matematik Öğretiminde Webquest’in Kullanımına İlişkin Öğretmen Adaylarının Görüşleri

Erdoğan Halat
Pages
264–283
Publication Date
2007-06-26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, the limitations and benefits of using webquest were also discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to examine the views of pre-service elementary teachers on the use of webquest in mathematics teaching with reference to a theoretical framework developed by Dodge in 1995.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The number of students in each group varied from 3 to 5.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, the limitations and benefits of using webquest were also discussed.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Webquest · matematik · internet kullanımı

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the views of pre-service elementary teachers on the use of webquest in mathematics teaching with reference to a theoretical framework developed by Dodge in 1995. One hundred forty eight pre-service elementary education teachers were involved in this study. Thirty-eight groups were formed. The number of students in each group varied from 3 to 5. All groups were assigned to create a webquest regarding various topics in mathematics, such as three-dimensional figures, volume, quadrilaterals, triangles, area, perimeter, numbers, operations, fractions. All group members contributed to their own webquests. After the process of creating webquests in a semester, the researcher administered an instrument containing six open-ended questions about the use of webquest in teaching and learning. The analysis of the data and participants’ opinions showed that the idea of using webquest as a new technique in teaching and learning mathematics was common among the participants who also stated that it could be used to teach in other disciplines. Furthermore, the limitations and benefits of using webquest were also discussed.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Bernie Dodge, webquest'in teorik tabanı oluşturulmuş ve geliştirilen web sitesinde; matematik öğretiminde bir model olarak kullanılıp kullanılamayacağı hakkında, öğretmen adaylarına görüşleri incelenmektedir. Araştırmaya, 3-5 kişilik 38 gruptan edilmiş toplam 148 sınıf öğretmenliği 3. sınıf öğrencisi katılmıştır. Bir gruptan, ilköğretimedeine uygun, isteğe bağlı herhangi bir matematik konusu; üç boyutlu cisimler, hacim, dörtgenler, üçgenler, alan, çevre, sayılar, dört işlem, kesirler vb. seçmeleri istenmiştir. Gruplara Webquest modeli geliştirmeleri söylenmiştir. Bir dönemlik, bütün grup üyelerinin katkılarıyla webquest hazırlama sonrasında sonra, katılımcılara webquest'in öğretim amacı kullanusamilan konusundaki düşüncelerini belirtilmeden gerekli açık-uçlu altı sorudan oluşan bir veri toplama aracı uygulanmıştır. Veriler nitel olarak değerlendirildi. Değerlendirme sonuçlarına göre, Webquestin yeni bir öğretim ve öğrenim modeli olarak matematik derslerinin kullanılabileceği, yaygın bir görüş olarak belirtilirken aynı zamanda diğer derslerde de kullanılabileceği ifade yayınlandı. Ayrıca, webquestin yararları ve sınırlılıkları da gösterilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Halat, E. (2007). Views of pre-service elementary teachers on the use of webquest in mathematics teaching. İlköğretim Online, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 264–283. https://ajindex.com/articles/1655870

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (37)

  1. Açıkalın, M. ve Duru, E. (2005). The use of computer Technologies in the social studies classroom. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(4).
  2. Aydın, A. (2004). Sınıf Yönetimi. Ankara: Teka aç Eylül Yayınları
  3. Bodgan, R.C., ve Biklen, S.K. (1998). Qualitative research in education (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  4. Dodge, B. (1997, May 5). Homepage. Some Thoughts about WebQuest. Retrieved December 23, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http://edweb.sdsu.edu/people/bdodge/Professional.html
  5. Dodge, B., (2001). Five rules for writing a great WebQuest. Learning ve Leading with Technology, 28(8), 6-10.
  6. Ekiz, D. (2003). E itimde ara tırma yöntem ve metodlarına giri. Ankara, Anı Yayıncılık.
  7. Fuys, D., Geddes, D., ve Tischler, R. (1988). The Van Hiele model of thinking in geometry among adolescents. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education: Monograph Number 3.
  8. Halat, E. (2005). Webquest’ in Ö retim Amaçlı Kullanımı. XIV. Ulusal E itim Bilimleri Kongresi, 28-30 Eylül 2005 Denizli.
  9. Halat, E ve Jakubowski, E. (2001). Teaching geometry using WebQuest. 19th International Conference on Technology and Education: Tallahassee, Florida.
  10. Huetinck, L., ve Munshin, SN.(2000). Teaching mathematics for the 21st century: methods and activities for grades 6-12. Columbus, OH: Prentice-Hall. Upper Saddle River.
  11. Joseph, L. C., (2000). FoodQuest for health. Multimedia Schools, 7(1), 34-7
  12. Kelly, R. (2000). Working with WebQuests. Teaching Exceptional Children, 32, 6, 4-13.
  13. Lamb ve Teclehaimanot (2004).
  14. March, T. (2000). WebQuests 101. Multimedia Schools, 7, 5, 55-58
  15. March, T. (1998, June1). Homepage. WebQuest for Learning. Retrieved June 7, 2000 from the World Wide Web:http://www.ozline.com/webquests/intro.html
  16. Mason, C.L., (2000). Online teacher education: an analysis of student teachers' use of computer-mediated communication. International Journal of Social Education, 15(1), 19-38.
  17. Middleton, J. A., ve Spanias, P. (1999). Motivation for achievement in mathematics: Findings, generalizations, and criticisms of the recent research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), 65-88.
  18. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA.
  19. Olkun, S. ve Toluk, Z. (2003). lkö retimde etkinlik temelli matematik ö retimi. Ankara. Anı Yayıncılık.
  20. Peker, M. (2005). lkö retim Matematik Ö retmenli ini Kazanan Ö rencilerin Ö renme Stilleri Ve Matematik Ba arisi Arasindaki li ki. E itim Ara tırmaları Dergisi, 21
  21. Serra, M. (1997). Discovering geometry: An inductive approach (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Key Curriculum Press.
  22. Skemp, R. (1987). The psychology of learning mathematics (Expanded American Ed.) Hillsdale, NJ:
  23. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  24. Stipek, D. (1998). Motivation to learn from theory to practice. (3rded.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn ve Bacon A Viacom Company.
  25. Summerville, J., (2000). WebQuests. TechTrends, 44(2), 31-5
  26. Swafford, O. J., Jones, G. A., ve Thornton, C. A. (1997). Increased knowledge in geometry and instructional practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(4), 467-483.
  27. Timmerman, M. A., (2000). Learning in the context of a mathematics teacher education course: two case studies of elementary teachers' conceptions of mathematics, mathematics teaching and learning, and the teaching of mathematics with technology. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 8(3), 247-58.
  28. Usiskin, Z. (1982). Van Hiele Levels and Achievement in Secondary School Geometry. (Final report of the
  29. Cognitive Development and Achievement in Secondary School Geometry Project.) Chicago:
  30. University of Chicago. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED220288).
  31. Yıldırım, A. ve im ek, H.(1999). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel ara tırma yöntemleri. Anakara: Seçkin Yayınları.
  32. Yılmaz, H., ve Sünbül, A.M.(2003). Ö retimde Planlama ve De erlendirme. Ankara: Mikro Yayınları
  33. Yoder, M.B., (1999). The Student WebQuest: a productive and thought- provoking use of the Internet. Learning and Learning with Technology, 26(7), 6-9.
  34. Von Glaserfeld, E.(1996). Aspects of radical constructvisim and its educational reccomendations. In Steffe, L., Nesher, P., Cobb, P., Goldin, GA. ve Greer, B. (Eds.), Theoris of mathematical learning (pp.307-314). Lawrences Erlbaum; New Jersey.
  35. Wiersma, W. (2000). Research methods in education: an introduction. (7th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn ve Bacon A Pearson Education Company.
  36. Ekiz, D. (2003). E itimde ara tırma yöntem ve metodlarına giri. Ankara, Anı Yayıncılık.
  37. Von Glaserfeld, E.(1996). Aspects of radical constructvisim and its educational reccomendations. In Steffe, L., Nesher, P., Cobb, P., Goldin, GA. ve Greer, B. (Eds.), Theoris of mathematical learning (pp.307-314). Lawrences Erlbaum; New Jersey.