Journals / Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online) / 2020 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

Assessment of materials and resources credit achievements of LEEDcertified buildings in Turkey based on certification levels

Pages
17–28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These recommendations not only help the achievement of sustainability goals for construction projects, but also assist in attaining higher credit points during the application processes for green building certification.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The construction industry is responsible for the consumption of large proportions of natural resources such as material, energy and water.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this green building certification system, “Materials and Resources” (MR) credit is one of the seven main credits and has 14 points, which accounts for approximately 13% of the maximum achievable points (110 pts. from seven different credits) for “New Construction” in LEED v3.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These recommendations not only help the achievement of sustainability goals for construction projects, but also assist in attaining higher credit points during the application processes for green building certification.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The construction industry is responsible for the consumption of large proportions of natural resources such as material, energy and water. Inefficient use of resources in the construction industry has a negative impact on the natural environment. In order to reduce these negative impacts on the natural environment, sustainable development has gained importance. “Green building” can be considered as the implementation of sustainable development principles in the construction industry. A building can be considered as “green” if it is evaluated and certified according to a recognized green building certification system such as LEED, BREAM, DGNB, BEPAC, CASBEE, etc. In Turkey, LEED is one of the most commonly preferred green building certification systems. In this green building certification system, “Materials and Resources” (MR) credit is one of the seven main credits and has 14 points, which accounts for approximately 13% of the maximum achievable points (110 pts. from seven different credits) for “New Construction” in LEED v3. However, the LEED certified green buildings in Turkey attain relatively low level of achievements in MR credit, regardless of the level of certification, especially when compared to the other categories. MR credit has seven sub-credits, which include: 1) building reuse, 2) construction waste management, 3) materials reuse, 4) recycled content, 5) regional materials 6) rapidly renewable materials, and 7) certified wood. The main objective of this study is to find out whether there are statistically significant differences between the MR credit achievements of 172 newly constructed and certified buildings in Turkey with respect to four different levels of certification. In addition, this study aims to investigate the potential reasons behind this low level of achievement in this credit. In this study, some recommendations have also been made to improve these low levels of achievements. These recommendations not only help the achievement of sustainability goals for construction projects, but also assist in attaining higher credit points during the application processes for green building certification.

🔖

Cite This Article

TURKOGLU, H., POLAT, G., DAMCİ, A. (2020). Assessment of materials and resources credit achievements of LEEDcertified buildings in Turkey based on certification levels. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation (Online), Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 17–28. https://ajindex.com/articles/165181

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Kim H, Stumpf A, Kim W (2011). Analysis of an energy efficient building design through data mining approach. Automation in Construction 20(1):37-43
  2. Marszal AJ, Heiselberg P, Bourrelle JS, Musall E, Voss K, Sartori I, Napolitano A (2011). Zero Energy Building–A review of definitions and calculation methodologies. Energy and Buildings 43(4):971-979
  3. Torcellini P, Pless S, Deru M, Crawley D. Zero energy buildings: A critical look at the definition. ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, 2006, CA, US
  4. Marszal AJ, Heiselberg P (2011). Life cycle cost analysis of a multi-storey residential net zero energy building in Denmark. Energy 36(9):5600- 5609
  5. Guan X, Xu Z, Jia QS (2010). Energy-efficient buildings facilitated by microgrid. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 1(3):243-252
  6. Feist W, Schnieders J, Dorer V, Haas A (2005). Reinventing air heating: Convenient and comfortable within the frame of the Passive House concept. Energy and Buildings 37(11):1186-1203
  7. Albatayneh A, Alterman D, Page A, Moghtaderi B (2016). Assessment of the thermal performance of complete buildings using adaptive thermal comfort. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 216:655- 661
  8. Cheung CK, Luther M, Fuller R. Low energy strategies for high-rise apartments in Hong Kong. in Modern practice of architectural science: from pedagogy to andragogy? 36th Conference of the Australian and New Zealand Architectural Science Association, 2002, Geelong
  9. Cheung CK, Fuller RJ, Luther MB (2005). Energyefficient envelope design for high-rise apartments. Energy and Buildings 37(1):37-48
  10. Sozer H (2010). Improving energy efficiency through the design of the building envelope. Building and Environment 45(12):2581-2593
  11. Kumar S, Ambassador EE. Benchmarking Energy Use in Buildings and Cleanrooms. Bangalore: ISA Vision Summit, 2011
  12. Morrissey J, Moore T, Horne RE (2011). Affordable passive solar design in a temperate climate: An experiment in residential building orientation. Renewable Energy 36(2):568-577
  13. Xu X, Huajing S, Ji Y, Xu P. Energy consumption simulation of the prototypical building for optimizing the orientation of building model in the simulated environment. Asim2012, 2012, Shanghai, China
  14. Abanda F, Byers L (2016). An investigation of the impact of building orientation on energy consumption in a domestic building using emerging BIM. Energy 97:517-527
  15. Al-Tamimi N. Impact of building envelope modifications on the ther