SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies / 2026 / Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1

THE DYNAMICS BETWEEN MUTUAL FUNDS FLOWS AND STOCK RETURNS: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM THE TURKEY MARKETS

Hümeyra Burucu
Filiz Yıldız Contuk
Pages
95–109
Publication Date
2011-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, findings show that there is a relationship between investment funds flow and earnings of market stock by the way there isn’t a causality relationship between investment funds flow and earnings of market stock

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the study is searching the relationships existence and its directions between investment funds flow and earnings of market stock in Turkey for the period of 2001:4-2011:2.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Because of variances are observed as integrated, by considering the possibility of existence at least there is a one way causality between variances, Granger causality test was made.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, findings show that there is a relationship between investment funds flow and earnings of market stock by the way there isn’t a causality relationship between investment funds flow and earnings of market stock
🔬Design:Makale
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Mutual Funds Flow · Stock returns · Causality

Abstract

The aim of the study is searching the relationships existence and its directions between investment funds flow and earnings of market stock in Turkey for the period of 2001:4-2011:2. Specifically, we investigate the possibility of a causality mechanism through which mutual funds flows may affect stock returns and vice versa. Time series techniques used for searching this relationship between variances. Primarily to state stagnancy Phillips-Perron unit stem text techniques used, then to state the longer period relationships existence between variances Johansen- Juselius test techniques used. Because of variances are observed as integrated, by considering the possibility of existence at least there is a one way causality between variances, Granger causality test was made. As a result, findings show that there is a relationship between investment funds flow and earnings of market stock by the way there isn’t a causality relationship between investment funds flow and earnings of market stock

🔖

Cite This Article

Burucu, H., Contuk, F. Y. (2011). THE DYNAMICS BETWEEN MUTUAL FUNDS FLOWS AND STOCK RETURNS: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM THE TURKEY MARKETS. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 95–109. https://ajindex.com/articles/1651570

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (40)

  1. Akel, Veli (2007), “Türkiye’deki A ve B Tipi Yatırım Fonları Performansının
  2. Devamlılığının Parametrik ve Parametrik Olmayan Yöntemlerle Değerlendirilmesi”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt:22, Sayı:2, s:147-177. Alexakis, Christos, Niarchos Nikitas, Patra Theopfano, Poshakwale Sunil (2005),
  3. “The dynamics between stock returns and mutual fund flows: empirical evidence from the Greek market”, International Review of Financial Analysis, Vol. 14, Issue 5, pp. 559-569. Arslan, Mehmet, Arslan Sıddık (2010), “Yatırım Fonu Performans Ölçütleri,
  4. Regresyon Analizleri ve MANOVA Yöntemine Göre A, B ve Borsa Yatırım Fonlarının Karşılaştırmalı Analizi”, İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Sayı.2, No.2, s.3-20. Atan, Murat, Atan Sibel, Özdemir Zeynel A. (2008), “Türkiye’deki Bazı Yatırım
  5. Fonlarının Performanslarının Değerlendirilmesi”, Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi Sayı.10 No.2, s.47-67. Bengtsson, Elias (2009), “European İnvestment Fund Flows And Financial
  6. Stability”, Journal of Asset Management, Vol.10, pp.293–304. Berk, Jonathan B., Green Richard C. (2004), “Mutual Fund Flows and Performance in Rational Markets”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol.112, pp.1269-1295.
  7. Breton, Michele, Hugonnier Julien, Masmoudi Tarek (2010), “Mutual fund competition in the presence of dynamic flows”, Automatica, Vol.46, pp.1176
  8. Cao, Chongyan, Niu Lixia, Yang Hua, Duan Changtao (2009), “An Empirical
  9. Study Of The Influence Of Mutual Funds On Firm Performance”, Management and Service Science, MASS '09 International Conference on, pp.1-4. Caporale, Guglielmo Maria, Philippas Nikolaos, Pittis Nikitas (2004), “Feedbacks between mutual fund flows and security returns: evidence from the Greek capital market”, Applied Financial Economics, Vol.14, No 14, pp. 981-989.
  10. Ceylan, Ali, Korkmaz Turhan (2008), İşletmelerde Finansal Yönetim: Ekin Yayınları, 10.baskı.
  11. Dahlquist, Magnus, Engström Stefan, Söderlind Paul (2000), “Performance and Characteristics of Swedish Mutual Funds”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol.35, pp.409-423.
  12. Doğanay, M. Mete (2002), “Hisse Senedi Fonlarının Çok Kriterli Karar Yaklaşımı
  13. İle Derecelendirilmesi”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 57-3, s.32. Engström, Stefan, Westerberg Anna (2004), “Information Costs and Mutual Fund
  14. Flows”, SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance, No.555. Frazzini, Andrea, Lamont Owen A.(2008), “Dumb Money: Mutual Fund Flows
  15. Andthe Cross-Sectıon Of Stock Returns”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol., pp.299–322. Greene, Jason T., Hodges Charles W.(2002), “The dilution impact of daily fund flows on open-end mutual funds”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.65, pp.131-158.
  16. Gujarati, Damodar N. (1995), Basic Econometrics, New York, McGraw-Hill, Third Edition.
  17. Huang, Jennıfer, Wei Kelsey D., Yan Hong (2007), “Participation Costs and the Sensitivity of Fund Flows to Past Performance”, The Journal of Finance, Vol.62, pp.1273–1311.
  18. Ivkovic, Zoran, Weisbenner Scott (2009), “Individual İnvestor Mutual Fund
  19. Flows”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.92, pp.223-237. Johnson, Woodrow T., Poterba James M. (2008), “Taxes And Mutual Fund
  20. Inflows Around Dıstrıbutıon Dates”, NBER Working Paper, No. 13884.
  21. Kadılar, Cem (2000), Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli Zaman Serileri Analizi:
  22. Ankara, Bizim Büro Basımevi. Kılıç, Saim (2002), Türkiye’deki Yatırım Fonlarının Performanslarının
  23. Değerlendirilmesi: İMKB Yayınları, Kasım 2002.
  24. Korkmaz, Turhan, Uygurtürk Hasan (2008), “Türkiye’deki Emeklilik Fonları ile Yatırım Fonlarının Performans Karşılaştırması ve Fon Yöneticilerinin Zamanlama
  25. Yetenekleri”, Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Sayı.15, No.1, pp.114 - 147
  26. Oh, Natalie Y., Parwada Jerry T. (2007), “Relations between mutual fund flows and stock market returns in Korea”, Journal of International Financial Markets,
  27. Institutions and Money, Vol.17, pp.140-151. Özütürk, Bülent (2009), “Yatırım Fonu Performanslarının Yatırım Fonu
  28. Endekslerinin Oluşturulması Yoluyla Ölçülmesi”, Yeterlilik Etüdü, Spk Kurumsal Yatırımcılar Dairesi Yayını, 2009, s.2.
  29. Rakowski, David, Wang Xiaoxin (2009), “The dynamics of short-term mutual fund flows and returns: A time-series and cross-sectional investigation”, Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol.33, pp.2102–2109.
  30. Sarıtaş, Hakan (2005), “Yatırım Fonu Karakteristiklerinin Getiri Üzerindeki
  31. Etkisi”, MUFAD Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi, Vol.27, pp.169-175. Shrider, David G. (2009), “Running from a Bear: How Poor Stock Market
  32. Performance Affects the Determinants of Mutual Fund Flows”, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol.36, pp.987-1006.
  33. Shu, Pei-Gi, Yeh Hua, Yamada Takeshi (2002), “The behavior of Taiwan mutual fund investors performance and fund flows”, Pacific-Basin Finance Journa,l Vol.10, pp.583-600.
  34. Sirri, Erik R., Tufano Peter (1998), “Costly Search And Mutual Fund Flows”, The Journal of Finance, Vol.53, pp.1589–1622
  35. SPK Yatırımcı Bilgilendirme Kitapçıkları-3 (2007), Yatırım Fonları, Ankara, s.3
  36. Thanou, Eleni Thanou, Tserkezos Dikaios (2009), “Non linear diachronic effects between stock returns and mutual fund flows: Additional empirical evidence from the Athens Stocks Exchange”, Annual Conference of the Hellenic Finance and Accounting Association.
  37. Yıldız, Ayşe (2006), “Yatırım Fonları Performanslarının Veri Zarfllama Anaıizi
  38. Yöntemiyle Değerlendirilmesi”, Ankara Üniversitesi, Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayıl.61, No.2, pp.213-234.
  39. Andthe Cross-Sectıon Of Stock Returns”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol., pp.299–322. Greene, Jason T., Hodges Charles W.(2002), “The dilution impact of daily fund flows on open-end mutual funds”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.65, pp.131-158.
  40. Yetenekleri”, Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Sayı.15, No.1, pp.114 - 147