Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2018 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 4

Imaging features of leadless cardiovascular devices

Pages
203–208
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The goal of this review is to summarize the data regarding the use of leadless cardiovascular devices including the CardioMEMS device, implantable loop recorder, and RV leadless pacemaker, and to present cases demonstrating their utility and normal imaging features.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Cardiovascular devices and hemodynamic monitoring systems continue to evolve with the goal of allowing for rapid clinical intervention and management.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Cardiovascular devices including the CardioMicroelectromechanical (CardioMEMS) device, implantable loop recorder, and right ventricular (RV) leadless pacemaker are now widely used for treatment and monitoring of advanced cardiac conditions, as many of these devices have been shown to significantly improve patient outcomes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The goal of this review is to summarize the data regarding the use of leadless cardiovascular devices including the CardioMEMS device, implantable loop recorder, and RV leadless pacemaker, and to present cases demonstrating their utility and normal imaging features.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Cardiovascular devices and hemodynamic monitoring systems continue to evolve with the goal of allowing for rapid clinical intervention and management. Cardiovascular devices including the CardioMicroelectromechanical (CardioMEMS) device, implantable loop recorder, and right ventricular (RV) leadless pacemaker are now widely used for treatment and monitoring of advanced cardiac conditions, as many of these devices have been shown to significantly improve patient outcomes. Additionally, hemodynamic monitoring devices have shown utility in monitoring patients with aortic aneurysms after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for early detection of Type I and Type II endoleaks. There is limited published data regarding the imaging features of these devices. As these devices become more widely used, it is important for radiologists to become familiar with the normal imaging features and potential complications. The goal of this review is to summarize the data regarding the use of leadless cardiovascular devices including the CardioMEMS device, implantable loop recorder, and RV leadless pacemaker, and to present cases demonstrating their utility and normal imaging features.

🔖

Cite This Article

CONYERS, J. M., RAJİAH, P., AHN, R., ABBARA, S., SABOO, S. S. (2018). Imaging features of leadless cardiovascular devices. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 4, 203–208. https://ajindex.com/articles/164881

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Sperzel J, Burri H, Gras D, et al. State of the art of leadless pacing. Europace 2015
  2. 1508–1513. [CrossRef] 2. Yandrapalli S, Raza A, Tariq S, Aronow WS. Ambulatory pulmonary artery pressure monitoring in advanced heart failure patients. World J Cardiol 2017
  3. 21–26. [CrossRef] 3. Ricci RP, Morichelli L, Quarta L, et al. Long-term patient acceptance of and satisfaction with implanted device remote monitoring. EP Europace 2010
  4. 674–679. [CrossRef] 4. Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2017
  5. e1–e23. [CrossRef] 5. Tang WH, Girod JP, Lee MJ, et al. Plasma B-type natriuretic peptide levels in ambulatory patients with established chronic symptomatic systolic heart failure. Circulation 2003
  6. 2964–2966. [CrossRef] 6. Abraham WT, Adamson PB, Bourge RC, et al. Wireless pulmonary artery haemodynamic monitoring in chronic heart failure: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2011
  7. 658–666. [CrossRef] 7. Feldman D, Naka Y, Cabuay B, et al. A wireless hemodynamic pressure sensor before and after ventricular assist device placement: A sub-study of the CHAMPION trial. J Heart Lung Transplant 2011
  8. S86. [CrossRef] 8. Lichtenberger JP, Gladwin Hui, Carter BW, Jamis-Dow C, Abbara S. Cardiac Devices. In: Abbara S, Kalva S. Problem solving in cardiovascular imaging. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2013
  9. 298–312. 9. Shavelle D, Jermyn R. The CardioMEMS heart failure sensor: a procedural guide for implanting physicians. J Invasive Cardiol 2016
  10. 273–279. 10. Mehta M, Taggert JB, Roddy SP, et al. Implications of endoleaks on aneurysm sac pressures following endovascular repair of elective and ruptured aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2009
  11. S7. [CrossRef] 11. Gandhi RT, Katzen BT, Tsoukas AI, Geisbüsch P. Aortic Aneurysm pressure sensors can be of value in the acute postoperative setting. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2011
  12. 412–417. [CrossRef] 12. Kanjwal K, Figueredo VM, Karabin B, Grubb BP. The implantable loop recorder: current uses, future directions. J Innov Card Rhythm Manage 2011
  13. 215–222. 13. Ermis C, Zhu AX, Pham S, et al. Comparison of automatic and patient-activated arrhythmia recordings by implantable loop recorders in the evaluation of syncope. Am J Cardiol 2003
  14. 815–819. [CrossRef] 14. Tanno K. Use of implantable and external loop recorders in syncope with unknown causes. J Arrhythm 2017
  15. 579–582. [CrossRef] 15. Krahn AD, Klei