Journals / Çocuk ve Gençlik Ruh Sağlığı Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1

Investigation of the psychological status of the high school students with regard to their sociodemographic characteristics

Lise öğrencilerinin psikolojik durumlarının sosyodemografik özelliklerine göre incelenmesi

Pages
3–12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Discussion: The results show that psychological well being of the students differs according to the gender, socioeconomical status and grades of students.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the students' psychological well being and the gender, socioeconomical status and the grades of the high school students.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: 482 students from 5 state and 2 private high-schools participated into this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Discussion: The results show that psychological well being of the students differs according to the gender, socioeconomical status and grades of students.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ergen psikolojisi · Demografi · Kişilik değerlendirmesi

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the association between the students' psychological well being and the gender, socioeconomical status and the grades of the high school students. Method: 482 students from 5 state and 2 private high-schools participated into this study. The Youth Self Report 11-18 and the information form developed by the investigators were given to the students. Results: The boys and the girls had significantly different scores on the problem behaviors subunits of the Youth Self Report; somatic complaints, anxious-depressed, delinquent behavior, internalizing and the total problem scores revealed differences. It was also found that students from the families with high socioeconomical status had higher scores on delinquent behavior subunit than the students from lower socioeconomical status. Finally the analyses showed that the students from different grades had different scores for the social problems, internalizing, externalizing, delinquent behaviors and the total problems. Discussion: The results show that psychological well being of the students differs according to the gender, socioeconomical status and grades of students. The necessity to conduct such studies and the importance of finding solutions to the problems of students were discussed in the present study.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada amaç, lise öğrencilerinin cinsiyet, sosyoekonomik düzey ve devam ettikleri sınıflarına göre psikolojik durumları arasındaki farklılıkları incelemektir. Yöntem: Araştırmaya, Ankara il merkezinde beş farklı ilçede yer alan beş resmi, iki özel liseden seçkisiz yöntemle seçilen 482 öğrenci katılmıştır. Çalışmaya katılan gençlere 11-18 yaş Gençler ‹çin Kendini Değerlendirme Ölçeği (YSR) ve araştırmacılar tarafından hazırlanan bilgi formu uygulanmıştır. Sonuçlar: Analizler sonucunda araştırma bulgularından bazıları şunlardır: 11-18 yaş Gençler için Kendini Deüerlendirme Ölçeüi, Sorun Davranışlar bölümünde; Somatik Sorunlar, Anksiyete-Depresyon, Suça Yönelik Davranışlar, içe Yönelim ve Toplam Problem'de cinsiyetler arası fark önemli bulunmuştur. Sosyoekonomik düzeye göre, suça yönelik davranışlar alt testinde üst sosyoekonomik düzey lise öğrencileri alt ve orta sosyoekonomik düzey lise öğrencilerine göre anlamlı olarak daha yüksek puan almışlardır. Gençlerin devam ettikleri sınıflarına göre, Sosyal içe Dönüklük, Suça Yönelik Davranışlar, içe Yönelim, Dışa Yönelim ve Toplam Problem'de sınıflar arası fark önemli bulunmuştur. Tartışma: Çalışmaya katılan lise öğrencilerinin cinsiyet, sosyoekonomik düzey ve sınıflarına göre ruhsal durumları arasında önemli farklar olduğu ve gençlerin bu sorunlarının irdelenmesi, tanılama ve sağaltım çalışmalarına önem verilmesi gerektiği görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

BALAT, U. G., AKMAN, B. (2006). Investigation of the psychological status of the high school students with regard to their sociodemographic characteristics. Çocuk ve Gençlik Ruh Sağlığı Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1, 3–12. https://ajindex.com/articles/164775

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Abramson LY, Metaisky GL, Alloy LB (1989) Hopelessness depression: a theory based subtype of depression. Psychol Rev 96:358-372.
  2. Achenbach TM (1991). Manual for the Youth Self-Report and Profile, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont Burlington VT. Achenbach TM, McConaughy S, Howell C (1987) Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychol Bull 101:213-232.
  3. Allgood-Merten B, Lewinsohn PM, Hops H (1990) Sex differences and adolescent depression. J Abnorm Psychol 99:55-63.
  4. Belter RW, Foster KY, Imn PS (1996) Convergent validity of select scales of the MMPI and the Achenbach child behavior checklist youth self-report. Psychol Rep 79:1091-1100.
  5. Bolger KE, Patterson CJ, Thompson WW ve ark. (1995) Psychosocial adjustment among children experiencing persistent and intermittent family economic hardship. Child Dev 66:1107-1129.
  6. Brown R (1999) Assessing attitudes and behaviors of high-risk adolescents: an evaluation of the self-report method. http://www.findarticles.com/m2248/n113 v34/5465/525. Clark DC, Sommerfeldt L, Schwartz M ve ark. (1990) Physical recklessness in adolescence: trait or by-product of depressive/suicidal states? J Nerv Ment Dis 178: 423-433.
  7. Conners CK, Wells KC, Parker-James DA ve ark. (1997) A new self report scale for assessment of adolescent psychopathology: factor, structure, reliability, validity, and diagnostic sensitivity. J Abnorm Child Psychol 25:487-498.
  8. Crijne A, Achenbach TM, Verhulst FC (1997) Comparisons of problems reported by parents of children in 12 cultures: total problems, externalizing and internalizing. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 36:1269-1277.
  9. Decay J, Kenny M (1994) Adolescent Development. Brown and Benmark, New Jersey. De Haan LG (1998) The relationship of individual and family factors to the psychological well-being of junior high school students living in urban poverty. http://www.findarticles.com/m2248/n129 v33/20740159. Dubois DL, Felner RD, Sherman MD ve ark. (1994) Socioenvironmental experiences, self-esteem, and emotional/behavioral problems in early adolescence. Am J Community Psychol 22:371-398.
  10. Duncan GJ, Brooks Gunn J, Klebanov P (1994) Economic deprivation and early childhood development. Child Dev 65:296-318
  11. Dusek JB (1987) Adolescent Development and Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Erol N, Kılıç C, Ulusoy M ve ark. (1998)
  12. Türkiye Ruh Sağlığı Profili Raporu, Eksen Yayınları, Ankara. Elliot DS,