Journals / Yenilikçi Mühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri / 2026 / Volume: 6 Issue: 2

Modeling the dispersion of quarry particulate matter in Sakarya, Türkiye using AERMOD: impacts on agriculture and the environment

Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-07-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, the proposed measurement–inventory–modeling framework offers a practical approach for quarry sites with similar topographic and climatic conditions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In highly productive Sakarya Province, understanding quarry-derived particulate dispersion and deposition is essential for protecting farmland and nearby communities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The total controlled emission rate was calculated as 30.77kg h⁻¹, with the largest contribution originating from the secondary and tertiary crusher units.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, the proposed measurement–inventory–modeling framework offers a practical approach for quarry sites with similar topographic and climatic conditions.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:quarry operations · particulate matter · AERMOD

Abstract

In highly productive Sakarya Province, understanding quarry-derived particulate dispersion and deposition is essential for protecting farmland and nearby communities. This study aims to quantify particulate matter (PM) emissions from a quarry operation located in Ferizli district, Sakarya Province, and to evaluate their potential environmental and human health impacts. In the field campaign, PM₁₀ concentrations were measured at three on-site locations using the gravimetric method, while deposited dust was monitored at four locations. An emission inventory was developed for excavation, loading/unloading, crushing–screening, haulage, and stockpiling activities using EPA-based emission factors under controlled and uncontrolled scenarios. Atmospheric dispersion was simulated with AERMOD, incorporating hourly meteorological data and terrain effects derived from AERMAP outputs. Measured PM₁₀concentrations remaining below the national limit value; deposited dust levels also did not exceed regulatory thresholds. Nevertheless, dispersion modeling indicated pronounced regional transport of pollutants, particularly toward agricultural areas. Despite the prevailing wind direction, the concentration maxima were oriented toward the southeast, which is attributed to local topography altering airflow patterns. The total controlled emission rate was calculated as 30.77kg h⁻¹, with the largest contribution originating from the secondary and tertiary crusher units. The findings underscore the importance of long-term monitoring with respect to heavy metal accumulation in agricultural soils and products. Recommended measures include regular heavy metal monitoring in agricultural soils, using pollutant-tolerant plant species, and installing vegetative buffer strips perpendicular to the dominant transport direction. Overall, the proposed measurement–inventory–modeling framework offers a practical approach for quarry sites with similar topographic and climatic conditions.

🔖

Cite This Article

Demircioğlu, E., Yiğit, M. G. (2026). Modeling the dispersion of quarry particulate matter in Sakarya, Türkiye using AERMOD: impacts on agriculture and the environment. Yenilikçi Mühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri, Volume: 6 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.61112/jiens.1824956

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (35)

  1. Karakaş A, Smith MR, Collis L (2020) Aggregates: Sand, gravel, and crushed rock aggregates for construction purposes. Arab J Geosci 13: 234. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12517-019-4975-Y
  2. Deniz Yıldız T (2020) Waste management costs (WMC) of mining companies in Turkey: Can waste recovery help meet these costs? Resour Policy 68: 101706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101706
  3. McKay B (2024) Exploring sustainable quarrying practices for environmental management. Environ Sci Technol 58, 1234–1245. https://doi.org/10.1101/PMC11050188
  4. Fugiel A, Burchart Korol D, Czaplicka Kolarz, K, Smoliński A (2017) Environmental impact and damage categories caused by air pollution emissions from mining and quarrying sectors of European countries. J Clean Prod 143:159–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.136
  5. Okafor OC, Njoku C, Akwuebu AN (2023) Environmental impact of quarrying on air quality in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Environ Sci Eur 35:98. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-023-00793-6
  6. Avşar E, Kaya E, Akmirza İ, Erdogan E, Çubukçu A (2014) Evaluation of the regional air quality effects of Istanbul Cebeci quarry and crushing-sifting facilities in terms of PM10 and SO2 concentrations. 14th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geoconference CP 359–366. Albena, Bulgaria, July 17-25.
  7. Thoa TKP, Hoang LS, Teron N, Rajasekhar B, Minh TP (2024) Characteristics of airborne particles in stone quarrying areas: Human exposure assessment and mitigation. Environ Res 245 118087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.118087
  8. Ahbil K, Sellami F, Baati H, Gautam S (2024) Influence of localized sources and meteorological conditions on dry-deposited particles: A case study of Gabès, Tunisia. Sci Total Environ 954, 176726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176726
  9. Madhaven P, Sanjay R (2005) Budhpura ground zero: Sandstone quarrying in India (Report). India Committee of the Netherlands.
  10. Roy A, Mandal M, Das S, Popek, R, Rakwal R, Agrawal GK, Awasthi A, Sarkar A (2024) The cellular consequences of particulate matter pollutants in plants: Safeguarding the harmonious integration of structure and function. Sci Total Environ 914:169763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169763
  11. Rai PK (2016) Impacts of particulate matter pollution on plants: Implications for environmental biomonitoring. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 129: 120–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.03.012
  12. Yaacob WZW, Pauzi NSM, Mutalib HA (2009) Acid mine drainage and heavy metals contamination at abandoned and active mine sites in Pahang. Bullt Geolog Soc Malaysia 55:15–20. https://doi.org/10.7186/bgsm55200903
  13. Gautam S, Basanta, K, Prusty A, Kumar P (2012) Pollution due to particulate matter from mining activities. Recyl Sustainable Dev 5:53–58.
  14. Tartakovsky D, Stern E, Broday DM (2016) Dispersion of TSP and PM10 emissions from quarries in complex terrain. Sci Total Environ 542:946–954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.133
  15. Blaga R, Gautam S (2024) Improving PM10 sensor accuracy in urban areas through calibration in Timișoara. Clim Atmos Sci njp 7:268. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-024-00812-0
  16. Perumpully SJ, Gautam S, John Paul J, Sreenath M (2024) Evaluating the impact of personal exposure to emissions from sustainable commercial heating and cooking fuels on women in rural southern India and their alignment with sustainable development goals. Water Air Soil Pollut 235:54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-023-06854-z
  17. Asif Z, Chen Z, Han Y (2018) Air quality modeling for effective environmental management in the mining region. J Air Waste Mange Assoc 68:1001–1014. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2018.1463301
  18. EIGM -Directorate General of Energy Affairs (2025) Renewable energy sources in Türkiye. Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources web. https://enerji.gov.tr/eigm-yenilenebilir-enerjikaynaklar-gunes. Accessed 21 June 2025
  19. Turkish Statistical Institute (2023) Sera gazi emisyon istatistikleri 1990–2019. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Sera-Gazi-Emisyon-Istatistikleri-1990-2019-37196. Accessed 01 July 2025.
  20. TSE-Turkish Standards Institute. (1996) Measurement methods of air pollution particulate matter indicators (TS 2341). https://standards.globalspec.com/std/1067673/ts-2341. Accessed 11 May 2025.
  21. The Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Environment Urbanization and Climate Change (2021) Türkiye’nin bilgilendirici envanter raporu. https://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/db/cygm/menu/turkey-s-irr-2021_tr_20211101034946.pdf. Accessed 29 September 2025.
  22. Leso V, Fontana L, Romano RR, Gervetti P, Iavicoli I (2019) Artificial stone associated silicosis: A systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16:568. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16040568
  23. Joseph T, Park S, Zhang W (2018) Topographic effects on dust dispersion patterns in quarry operations. Environ Monit Assess 190:345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6719-y
  24. Gümrükçüoğlu Yiğit M (2011) Urban air pollution monitoring by using geographic information systems: A case study from Sakarya, Turkey. Carpathian J Earth Environ Sci 6(2):73-84.
  25. Sairanen M, Rinne M, Selonen O (2019) AERMOD modeling for environmental impact assessment of quarry emissions. Atmos Environ 198:123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.10.040
  26. Güzel İzmirli Ş (2025) Farklı bitki türlerinin ağır metal içerikleri üzerine taş ocaklarının etkisinin değerlendirilmesi. Gümüşhane Üniv. Fen Bilim Der 15(2):432–450. https://doi.org/10.17714/gumusfenbil.1607018
  27. Monterroso C, Rodríguez F, Chaves R, Diez J, Becerra Castro C, Kidd PS, Macías F (2014) Heavy metal distribution in mine-soils and plants growing in a Pb/Zn-mining area in NW Spain. Appl. Geochem 44:3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2013.09.001
  28. Pope CA, Dockery DW (2006) Health effects of fine particulate air pollution: Lines that connect. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 56:709–742. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2006.10464485
  29. World Health Organization (2021) WHO global air quality guidelines: Particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide. World Health Organization web. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240034228. Accessed 05 November 2025.
  30. Rushton L (2003) Health hazards and waste management. Br Medical Bull 68:183–197. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldg034
  31. Bada BS, Akande EA (2010) Greenhouse gases concentrations in the atmosphere along selected roads in Abeokuta Ogun State, Nigeria. Ethiopian J Environ Study Manage 3(1):78–82. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ejesm/article/view/54404.
  32. Thompson RJ, Visser AT (2007) Mine haul road fugitive dust emission and exposure characterization. Min Eng 59:73–78. https://doi.org/10.2495/EHR030111
  33. Organiscak JA, Page SJ (2005) Development of a water spray system for dust control applications. Min Eng 57, 39–44.
  34. Xie Z, Huang C, Zha, Z, Xiao Y, Zhao Q, Lin J (2022) Review and prospect the development of dust suppression technology and influencing factors for blasting construction. Tunnelling Underground Space Technol 125:104532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2022.104532
  35. Heisler GM, Dewalle DR (1988) Effects of windbreak structure on wind flow. Agric Ecosyst Environ 22:41–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8809(88)90007-2