SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uşak Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 2 Sayı: 3

The Sealing Ability of Biodentine: A Literature Review

Biodentine’in Sızdırmazlık Kabiliyeti: Bir Literatür Derlemesi

Elif Kuru(UŞAK ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-0396-7677
Pages
65–68
Publication Date
2023-12-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The objective of this review was to assess in-vitro studies that have focused on the microleakage of Biodentine in different applications and to suggest clinical recommendations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Microleakage, the passage of cariogenic elements between dental restorations and cavity walls, is a major concern in dentistry.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Biodentine, a tri-calcium silicate cement introduced in 2009 as a dentin replacement material, shows promise due to its composition, easy handling, faster setting time, antimicrobial properties and bioactivity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The objective of this review was to assess in-vitro studies that have focused on the microleakage of Biodentine in different applications and to suggest clinical recommendations.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Mikrosızıntı · tri-kalsiyum silikat siman · dentin

Abstract

Microleakage, the passage of cariogenic elements between dental restorations and cavity walls, is a major concern in dentistry. Microleakage is a frequently seen factor contributing to the failure of dental restorations, tooth loss, and hypersensitivity. Biodentine, a tri-calcium silicate cement introduced in 2009 as a dentin replacement material, shows promise due to its composition, easy handling, faster setting time, antimicrobial properties and bioactivity. Biodentine has been stated to have broader clinical use than the Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) including pulp capping, pulpotomy, perforation repair, bifurcation lesion repair, internal and external root resorption, apexification, liner material for the coronal restorations as well as deep cervical and root cavities. Thus, the sealing ability of Biodentine is critical for dentin remineralization and restoration success. The objective of this review was to assess in-vitro studies that have focused on the microleakage of Biodentine in different applications and to suggest clinical recommendations.

Özet

Mikrosızıntı, diş restorasyonları ile diş dokuları arasında karyojenik maddelerin geçişi olarak tanımlanır. Mikrosızıntı, diş restorasyonlarının başarısızlığı, diş kaybı ve aşırı hassasiyet sebeplerinden en sık görülen faktörlerdendir. 2009 yılında dentin yerine geçen restoratif malzeme olarak tanıtılan tri-kalsiyum silikat simanı olan Biodentine, bileşimi, kolay kullanımı, hızlı sertleşme süresi, antimikrobiyal özellikleri ve biyoaktivitesi nedeniyle umut vaat etmektedir. Biodentine, Mineral Trioksit Agregat’tan (MTA) daha geniş bir klinik kullanıma sahip olduğu bildirilmiştir; bunlar arasında pulpa kaplama, pulpotomi, perforasyon onarımı, bifurkasyon lezyonu onarımı, internal ve eksternal kök rezorbsiyonu, apeksifikasyon, koronal restorasyonlar için kaide malzemesi ve derin servikal ve kök çürükleri bulunmaktadır. Bu nedenle, Biodentine'in sızdırmazlık yeteneği, dentin remineralizasyonu ve restorasyon başarısı için kritiktir. Bu derleme, Biodentine'in farklı uygulama alanlarında mikrosızıntı üzerine çalışan in-vitro çalışmaları değerlendirmek ve klinik önerilerde bulunmak amacıyla yapılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kuru, E. (2023). The Sealing Ability of Biodentine: A Literature Review. Uşak Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 3, 65–68. https://ajindex.com/articles/1647296

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (27)

  1. Kidd EA. Microleakage: a review. J Dent. 1976;4(5):199–206.
  2. Auschill TM, Koch CA, Wolkewitz M, Hellwig E, & Arweiler NB. Occurrence and causing stimuli of postoperative sensitivity in composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2009;34(1):3–10.
  3. Raskin A, D’Hoore W, Gonthier S, Degrange M, & Déjou J. Reliability of in vitro microleakage tests: a literature review. J Adhes Dent. 2001;3(4): 295–308.
  4. Trowbridge HO. Model systems for determining biologic effects of microleakage Oper Dent. 1987;12(4): 164—172.
  5. Watson TF, Atmeh AR, Sajini S, Cook RJ, & Festy F. Present and future of glass-ionomers and calcium-silicate cements as bioactive materials in dentistry: Biophotonics-based interfacial analyses in health and disease. Dent Mater. 2014;30(1):50–61.
  6. Kaur M, Singh H, Dhillon JS, Batra M, & Saini M. MTA versus biodentine: Review of literature with a comparative analysis J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2017;11(8):ZG01–ZG05.
  7. Atmeh AR, Chong EZ, Richard G, Boyde A, Festy F, & F WT. Calcium silicate cement-induced remineralisation of totally demineralised dentine in comparison with glass ionomer cement: tetracycline labelling and two-photon fluorescence microscopy J Microsc. 2015;257(2):151–160.
  8. Jefferies SR. Bioactive and biomimetic restorative materials: a comprehensive review. Part I. J Esthet Restor Dent Off Publ Am Acad Esthet Dent. 2014;26(1):14–26.
  9. Grech L, Mallia B, & Camilleri J. Characterization of set Intermediate Restorative Material, Biodentine, Bioaggregate and a prototype calcium silicate cement for use as root-end filling materials. Int Endod J. 2013;46(7):632–641.
  10. Bani M, Sungurtekin-Ekçi E, & Odabaş ME. Efficacy of Biodentine as an Apical Plug in Nonvital Permanent Teeth with Open Apices: An In Vitro Study. Biomed Res Int. 2015; 359275.
  11. El-Khodary HM, Farsi DJ, Farsi NM, & Zidan AZ. Sealing Ability of Four Calcium Containing Cements used for Repairing Furcal Perforations in Primary Molars: An in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015;16(9):733–739
  12. Butt N, Talwar S, Chaudhry S, Nawal RR, Yadav S, & Bali A. Comparison of physical and mechanical properties of mineral trioxide aggregate and Biodentine. Indian J Dent Res Off Publ Indian Soc Dent Res 2014;25(6):692–697.
  13. Naik MM, de Ataide I de N, Fernandes M, & Lambor R. Assessment of apical seal obtained after irrigation of root end cavity with MTAD followed by subsequent retrofilling with MTA and Biodentine: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2015;18(2):132–135.
  14. Agrafioti A, Tzimpoulas N, Chatzitheodoridis E, & Kontakiotis EG. Comparative evaluation of sealing ability and microstructure of MTA and Biodentine after exposure to different environments. Clin Oral Investig. 2016; 20(7):1535–1540.
  15. Mandava P, Bolla N, Thumu J, Vemuri S, & Chukka S. Microleakage evaluation around retrograde filling materials prepared using conventional and ultrasonic techniques. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015; 9(2):ZC43-6.
  16. Soundappan S, Sundaramurthy JL, Raghu S, & Natanasabapathy V. Biodentine versus Mineral Trioxide Aggregate versus Intermediate Restorative Material for Retrograde Root End Filling: An Invitro Study. J Dent (Tehran). 2014;11(2):143–149.
  17. Jeevani E, Jayaprakash T, Bolla N, Vemuri S, Sunil CR, & Kalluru RS. Evaluation of sealing ability of MM-MTA, Endosequence, and biodentine as furcation repair materials: UV spectrophotometric analysis. J Conserv Dent. 2014;17(4):340–343.
  18. Nanjappa AS, Ponnappa KC, Nanjamma KK, Ponappa MC, Girish S, & Nitin A. Sealing ability of three root-end filling materials prepared using an erbium: Yttrium aluminium garnet laser and endosonic tip evaluated by confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Conserv Dent. 2015;18(4):327–330.
  19. Nepal M, Shubham S, Tripathi R, Khadka J, Kunwar D, Gautam V, & Gautam N. Spectrophotometric analysis evaluating apical microleakage in retrograde filling using GIC, MTA and biodentine: an in-vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):37.
  20. Camilleri J, Sorrentino F, & Damidot D. Characterization of un-hydrated and hydrated BioAggregate and MTA Angelus. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(3):689–698.
  21. Aggarwal V, Singla M, Yadav S, Yadav H, & Ragini. Marginal Adaptation Evaluation of Biodentine and MTA Plus in “Open Sandwich” Class II Restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015;27(3):167–175.
  22. Koubi S, Elmerini H, Koubi G, Tassery H, & Camps J. Quantitative evaluation by glucose diffusion of microleakage in aged calcium silicate-based open-sandwich restorations. Int J Dent. 2012;105863.
  23. Raskin A, Eschrich G, Dejou J, & About I. In vitro microleakage of Biodentine as a dentin substitute compared to Fuji II LC in cervical lining restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2012;14(6):535–542.
  24. Raju VG, Venumbaka NR, Mungara J, Vijayakumar P, Rajendran S, & Elangovan A. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and microleakage of tricalcium silicate-based restorative material and radioopaque posterior glass ionomer restorative cement in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2014;32(4):304–310.
  25. Qi Y, Li N, Niu L, Primus CM, Ling J-Q, Pashley DH, & Tay FR. Remineralization of artificial dentinal caries lesions by biomimetically modified mineral trioxide aggregate Acta Biomater. 2012;8(2):836–842.
  26. Arends J, Ruben JL, Christoffersen J, Jongebloed WL, & Zuidgeest TG. Remineralization of human dentine in vitro. Caries Res. 1990;24(6):432–435.
  27. Atmeh AR, Chong EZ, Richard G, Festy F, & Watson TF. Dentin-cement interfacial interaction: calcium silicates and polyalkenoates J Dent Res. 2012;91(5):454–459.