Journals / Senectus / 2026 / Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1

Aging and Communicating in Digital Age: Exploring Social and Family Connectivity of the Elderly

Journal
Senectus
Pages
141–168
Publication Date
2026-04-13
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings from this review aim to inform researchers, educators, and policymakers about effective strategies for leveraging technology to support the aging population’s social and emotional well-being in an increasingly digital world.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the digital age, the role of technology in shaping the social and emotional experiences of older adults has become increasingly significant, yet remains underexplored.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To address this complex issue, the study analyzes ten peer-reviewed articles published between 2022 and 2025, selected through academic databases using targeted keywords.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Findings from this review aim to inform researchers, educators, and policymakers about effective strategies for leveraging technology to support the aging population’s social and emotional well-being in an increasingly digital world.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2022 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Aging · Communication · Digital age

Abstract

In the digital age, the role of technology in shaping the social and emotional experiences of older adults has become increasingly significant, yet remains underexplored. This literature review investigates whether digital technologies—ranging from virtual reality to online social platforms—serve as tools for enhancing social connectedness among older adults or inadvertently contribute to greater isolation and loneliness. While some evidence suggests that digital engagement can promote emotional well-being and reduce feelings of exclusion, many older individuals still face barriers such as limited digital literacy, access, and trust in technology. To address this complex issue, the study analyzes ten peer-reviewed articles published between 2022 and 2025, selected through academic databases using targeted keywords. A qualitative content analysis approach is employed to examine each study’s methodology, population focus, type of digital intervention, and outcomes. The synthesis reveals both promising practices and critical gaps in current approaches to digital inclusion for older populations. Findings from this review aim to inform researchers, educators, and policymakers about effective strategies for leveraging technology to support the aging population’s social and emotional well-being in an increasingly digital world.

🔖

Cite This Article

Eroğlu, D. T. (2026). Aging and Communicating in Digital Age: Exploring Social and Family Connectivity of the Elderly. Senectus, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 141–168. https://doi.org/10.26650/senectus.2026.4.1.0992

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (29)

  1. Antonucci, T. C., & Akiyama, H. (1987). Social networks in adult life and a preliminary examination of the convoy model. Journal of Gerontology, 42(5), 519–527. https://doi.org/10.1093/ geronj/42.5.519
  2. Antonucci, T. C., Ajrouch, K. J., & Birditt, K. S. (2010). The Convoy Model: Explaining social relations from a multidisciplinary perspective. The Gerontologist, 50(5), 548–557. doi: 10.1093/ geront/gnt118
  3. Cabinet Office of Japan. (2022). Annual Report on the Aging Society: 2022. https://www8.cao. go.jp/kourei/english/annualreport/2022/pdf/2022.pdf
  4. Carstensen, L. L. (1992). Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: Support for socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychology and Aging, 7(3), 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882- 7974.7.3.331
  5. Charness, N., & Boot, W. R. (2022). Aging and Information Technology Use: Potential and Barriers. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 31(2), 158–164. https://doi. org/10.1177/09637214221076010
  6. Chen, Y. R. R., & Schulz, P. J. (2016). The Effect of Information Communication Technology Interventions on Reducing Social Isolation in the Elderly: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4596
  7. Choi, M., Kong, S., & Jung, D. (2021). Computer and internet interventions for loneliness and depression in older adults: A meta-analysis. Healthcare, 9(1), 47. DOI: 10.4258/hir.2012.18.3.191
  8. Chopik, W. J. (2016). The Benefits of Social Technology Use Among Older Adults Are Mediated by Reduced Loneliness. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(9), 551–556. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0151
  9. Coyle, C. E., & Dugan, E. (2012). Social isolation, loneliness and health among older adults. Journal of Aging and Health, 24(8), 1346–1363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264312460275
  10. Czaja, S. J., Boot, W. R., Charness, N., & Rogers, W. A. (2018). Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches (3rd ed.). CRC Press.
  11. Fiori, K. L., Antonucci, T. C., & Cortina, K. S. (2006). Social network typologies and mental health among older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 61(1), P25–P32. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/61.1.P25
  12. Hajek, A., Brettschneider, C., Lange, C., Posselt, T., Wiese, B., Mamone, S.,. & König, H. H. (2017). Social support and health-related quality of life among the older population in Germany. BMC Geriatrics, 17(1), 1–9. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-021-03070-2
  13. Harwood, J. (2007). Understanding communication and aging: Developing knowledge and awareness. Sage Publications
  14. Kahn, R. L., & Antonucci, T. C. (1980). Convoys over the life course: Attachment, roles, and social support. In P. B. Baltes & O. G. Brim Jr. (Eds.), Life-span development and behavior (Vol. 3, pp. 253–286). New York: Academic Press.
  15. Khalili-Mahani, N., Smyrnova, A., & Kakinami, L. (2019). To each his own: Age and cultural differences in how people experience and use digital technologies in Canada. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(10), e14207. https://doi.org/10.2196/14207
  16. Lang, F. R., & Carstensen, L. L. (1994). Close emotional relationships in late life: Further support for proactive aging in the social domain. Psychology and Aging, 9(2), 315–324. https://doi. org/10.1037/0882-7974.9.2.315
  17. Newman, L., Browne-Yung, K., Raghavendra, P., Wood, D., & Grace, E. (2019). Applying a critical approach to investigate barriers to digital inclusion and online social connection for older people. Information, Communication & Society, 22(11), 1613–1631. https://doi.org/10.10 80/1369118X.2018.1457632
  18. Peek, M. K., & Lin, N. (1999). Age differences in the effects of network composition on psychological distress. Social Science & Medicine, 49(5), 621–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0277-9536(99)00139-2
  19. Schulz, R., Wahl, H. W., Matthews, J. T., De Vito Dabbs, A., Beach, S. R., & Czaja, S. J. (2015). Advancing the aging and technology agenda in gerontology. The Gerontologist, 55(5), 724–734. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu071
  20. Seifert, A. (2020). The digital exclusion of older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 63(6–7), 674–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2020.176 4687
  21. Silverstein, M., & Bengtson, V. L. (1997). Intergenerational solidarity and the structure of adult child–parent relationships in American families. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 429– 460. https://doi.org/10.1086/231213
  22. Sixsmith A, Horst BR, Simeonov D, Mihailidis A.(2022). Older People’s Use of Digital Technology During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Bull Sci Technol Soc. Jun;42(1-2):19-24. doi: 10.1177/02704676221094731. PMID: 38603230; PMCID: PMC9038938.
  23. Thomas, P. A. (2010). Is it better to give or to receive? Social support and the well-being of older adults. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 65(3), 351–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbp113
  24. Tsai, H. Y. S., Shillair, R., & Cotten, S. R. (2015). Social support and “playing around”: An examination of how older adults acquire digital literacy with tablet computers. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 36(1), 29–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464815609440
  25. United Nations. (2023). World Population Prospects 2022: Summary of Results. https://population. un.org/wpp
  26. Xie, B. (2011). Experimenting on the Impact of Learning Methods and Information Presentation Channels on Older Adults’ e-Health Literacy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(9), 1797–1807. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21575
  27. Wilson, C., & Weatherall, A. (2023). Digital inclusion and the emotional lives of older adults: Internet use, social connection, and loneliness. Journal of Aging Studies, 65, 101114. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jaging.2023.101114
  28. World Health Organization. (2021). Decade of Healthy Aging: Baseline Report. https://www.who. int/publications/i/item/9789240017900
  29. Hajek, A., Brettschneider, C., Lange, C., Posselt, T., Wiese, B., Mamone, S.,. & König, H. H. (2017). Social support and health-related quality of life among the older population in Germany. BMC Geriatrics, 17(1), 1–9. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-021-03070-2