SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Physics and Astronomy Reports / 2026 / Volume: 4 Issue: 1

Spectroscopic Disentangling Revealed the Tertiary Component in the Multiple System EMBoo

Ömrüm Hilal Yıldız(AKDENIZ UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-5078-1293
Hicran Bakış(AKDENIZ UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-8875-5464
Burcu Ozkardes(CANAKKALE ONSEKIZ MART UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-6764-9299
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-06-17
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Both the SED-based and photometric distances converge around 𝑑 = 300 pc, indicating that the Gaia trigonometric parallax underestimates the true distance of EMBoo.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We present a comprehensive photometric and spectroscopic study of the triple stellar system EMBoo.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Synthetic spectra were generated for each disentangled component, allowing determination of their atmospheric parameters.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Both the SED-based and photometric distances converge around 𝑑 = 300 pc, indicating that the Gaia trigonometric parallax underestimates the true distance of EMBoo.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:EM Boo system · Eclipsing binary stars · Stellar fundamental parameters

Abstract

We present a comprehensive photometric and spectroscopic study of the triple stellar system EMBoo. The system is composed of detached, low-mass components, and for the first time in the literature, the spectrum of the tertiary component has been successfully disentangled from the composite spectrum using the KOREL code. Synthetic spectra were generated for each disentangled component, allowing determination of their atmospheric parameters. The depth of the H𝛼 line in the tertiary spectrum indicates that it is an intermediate-temperature star, consistent with spectral types between A and F, and its effective temperature was determined to be 7000 K. By analyzing the radial velocity and light curves simultaneously, the fundamental physical parameters of the system were derived, and its detailed evolutionary status was investigated using MESA models. The HIPPARCOS trigonometric parallax (𝜛Hip = 1.33 ± 1.45 mas) and Gaia DR3 trigonometric parallax (𝜛Gaia = 3.9699 ± 0.1812 mas) show a significant discrepancy, most likely related to the system’s multiplicity and the limitations of single-star astrometric solutions. To provide independent distance estimates, we modeled the spectral energy distribution (SED) using multi-wavelength flux data, yielding 𝐸(𝐵 − 𝑉) = 0.05 mag and a trigonometric parallax 𝜛SED = 3.2 mas, corresponding to 𝑑SED = 313 pc. Furthermore, photometric distance estimates based on the components’ absolute magnitudes yield 𝑑1 = 299 pc and 𝑑2 = 301 pc, in good agreement with the SED-based distance. Both the SED-based and photometric distances converge around 𝑑 = 300 pc, indicating that the Gaia trigonometric parallax underestimates the true distance of EMBoo.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yıldız, Ö. H., Bakış, H., Ozkardes, B. (2026). Spectroscopic Disentangling Revealed the Tertiary Component in the Multiple System EMBoo. Physics and Astronomy Reports, Volume: 4 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.26650/PAR.2026.00007

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (62)

  1. Bakış V., Eker Z., 2022, Acta Astronomica, 72, 195 google scholar
  2. Bakış V., Budding E., Erdem A., Bakış H., Demircan O., Hadrava P.,2006, MNRAS, 370, 1935 google scholar
  3. Bakış H., Bakış V., Demircan O., Eker Z., 2008, MNRAS, 385, 381 google scholar
  4. Bakış V., et al., 2019, Astrophysics and Space Science, 364, 162 google scholar
  5. Bakış H., Hilal Yıldız Ö., Bakış V., Yücel G., 2025, Publ. Astron. Soc.Australia, 42, e114 google scholar
  6. Baranne A., et al., 1996, Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement,119, 373 google scholar
  7. Castelli F., 1988, Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste Pubblicazioni,1164 google scholar
  8. Castelli F., Kurucz R. L., 2003, in Piskunov N., Weiss W. W., Gray D. F., eds, IAU Symposium Vol. 210, Modelling of Stellar Atmospheres. p. A20 (arXiv:astro-ph/0405087),doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0405087 google scholar
  9. Couteau P., 1970, Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, 3,51 google scholar
  10. Eggleton P. P., 1983, The Astrophysical Journal, 268, 368 google scholar
  11. Eker Z., Bakış V., 2023, MNRAS, 523, 2440 google scholar
  12. Eker Z., et al., 2018, MNRAS, 479, 5491 google scholar
  13. Fabricius C., Makarov V. V., 2000, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 356,141 google scholar
  14. Fabricius C., Høg E., Makarov V. V., Mason B. D., Wycoff G. L., Urban S. E., 2002, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 384, 180 google scholar
  15. Fernandes J., Vaz A. I. F., Vicente L. N., 2012, MNRAS, 425, 3104 google scholar
  16. Foreman-Mackey D., Hogg D. W., Lang D., Goodman J., 2013, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125, 306 google scholar
  17. Gaia Collaboration 2023, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 674, A1 google scholar
  18. Gaia Collaboration et al., 2016, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 595, A1 google scholar
  19. Grevesse N., Sauval A. J., 1998, Space Science Reviews, 85, 161 google scholar
  20. Jermyn A. S., et al., 2023, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 265, 15 google scholar
  21. Joyce M., Tayar J., 2023, Galaxies, 11, 75 google scholar
  22. Kurucz R. L., 1970, SAO Special Report, 309 google scholar
  23. Lebreton Y., Goupil M. J., 2014, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 569,A21 google scholar
  24. Lightkurve Collaboration et al., 2018, Lightkurve: Kepler and TESS time series analysis in Python, Astrophysics Source Code Library (ascl:1812.013) google scholar
  25. Lindegren L., et al., 2021, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 649, A2 google scholar
  26. Lucy L. B., 1967, Zeitschrift für Astrophysik, 65, 89 google scholar
  27. Malkov O. Y., Oblak E., Snegireva E. A., Torra J., 2006, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 446, 785 google scholar
  28. McDonald I., Zijlstra A. A., Boyer M. L., 2012, MNRAS, 427, 343 google scholar
  29. Moultaka J., Ilovaisky S. A., Prugniel P., Soubiran C., 2004, The Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 116, 693 google scholar
  30. Muñoz Bermejo J., Asensio Ramos A., Allende Prieto C., 2013, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 553, A95 google scholar
  31. Özkardeş B., Bakış H., Bakış V., 2018, in Turkish Physical Society 33rd International Physics Congress (TPS33). AIP, p. 030005,doi:10.1063/1.5025964 google scholar
  32. Paxton B., Bildsten L., Dotter A., Herwig F., Lesaffre P., Timmes F.,2011, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 192, 3 google scholar
  33. Paxton B., et al., 2013, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series,208, 4 google scholar
  34. Paxton B., et et al., 2015, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series,220, 15 google scholar
  35. Paxton B., et al., 2018, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series,234, 34 google scholar
  36. Paxton B., et al., 2019, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series,243, 10 google scholar
  37. Peimbert M., Luridiana V., Peimbert A., 2007, The Astrophysical Journal, 666, 636 google scholar
  38. Perryman M. A. C., et al., 1997, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 323,L49 google scholar
  39. Prša A., Zwitter T., 2005, ApJ, 628, 426 google scholar
  40. Rappaport S., Verbunt F., Joss P. C., 1983, The Astrophysical Journal,275, 713 google scholar
  41. Ricker G. R., et al., 2015, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 1, 014003 google scholar
  42. Rosales J. A., Mennickent R. E., Schleicher D. R. G., Senhadji A. A.,2019, MNRAS, 483, 862 google scholar
  43. Ruciński S. M., 1969, Acta Astronomica, 19, 245 google scholar
  44. Skumanich A., 1972, The Astrophysical Journal, 171, 565 google scholar
  45. Soydugan F., Soydugan E., Aliçavuş F., 2020, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 20, 052 google scholar
  46. Szczygieł D. M., Socrates A., Paczyński B., Pojmański G., Pilecki B.,2008, Acta Astronomica, 58, 405 google scholar
  47. Valle G., Dell’Omodarme M., Prada Moroni P. G., Degl’Innocenti S.,2014, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 561, A125 google scholar
  48. Verbunt F., Zwaan C., 1981, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 100, L7 google scholar
  49. Verma K., Rørsted J. L., Serenelli A. M., Aguirre Børsen-Koch V., Winther M. L., Stokholm A., 2022, MNRAS, 515, 1492 google scholar
  50. Wenger M., et al., 2000, Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement,143, 9 google scholar
  51. Wilson R. E., 1994, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 106, 921 google scholar
  52. Wilson R. E., 2008, The Astrophysical Journal, 672, 575 google scholar
  53. Wilson R. E., 2012, Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences, 29,115 google scholar
  54. Wilson R. E., 2020, Galaxies, 8, 57 google scholar
  55. Yücel G., Bakış V., 2022, MNRAS, 516, 2486 google scholar
  56. Yücel G., Canbay R., Bakış V., 2024, Physics and Astronomy Reports,2, 18 google scholar
  57. Yücel G., Bakış V., Canbay R., Alan N., Banks T., Bilir S., 2025, The Astronomical Journal, 169, 71 google scholar
  58. Yücel G., Bilir S., Bakıs, V., Eker Z., 2026a, The Astronomical Journal,171, 49 google scholar
  59. Yücel G., Alan N., Banks T., Canbay R., Bakıs, V., Bilir S., 2026b,The Astrophysical Journal, 997, 8 google scholar
  60. Zahn J.-P., 1977, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 57, 383 google scholar
  61. van Hamme W., 1993, The Astronomical Journal, 106, 2096 google scholar
  62. van Leeuwen F., 2007, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 474, 653 google scholar