Journals / International Journal of New Findings in Engineering, Science and Technology / 2026 / Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1

Advances in Renewable Energy Systems: Integrating Solar, Wind, and Hydropower for a Carbon-Neutral Future

Pages
14–24
Publication Date
2025-03-28
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These findings emphasize the importance of region-specific strategies, hybrid energy systems, and technological advancements in enhancing the efficiency, reliability, and sustainability of renewable energy systems globally.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study analyzes the integration of solar, wind, and hydropower systems across North America, Europe, Asia, and Africa, focusing on their performance, economic feasibility, environmental impact, and scalability.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Solar energy contributed 40%, 50%, and 35% in North America, Europe, and Asia, respectively, while wind energy led in Asia at 45%.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These findings emphasize the importance of region-specific strategies, hybrid energy systems, and technological advancements in enhancing the efficiency, reliability, and sustainability of renewable energy systems globally.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Renewable Energy · Solar Energy · Wind Energy

Abstract

This study analyzes the integration of solar, wind, and hydropower systems across North America, Europe, Asia, and Africa, focusing on their performance, economic feasibility, environmental impact, and scalability. Solar energy contributed 40%, 50%, and 35% in North America, Europe, and Asia, respectively, while wind energy led in Asia at 45%. In Africa, solar energy contributed 40%, wind 30%, and hydropower 30%. Hydropower exhibited the highest efficiency rates at 85% across all regions, followed by wind (75%) and solar (60%). In Africa, the efficiency rates for solar, wind, and hydropower were 88%, 87%, and 91%, respectively. ANOVA results revealed significant regional differences in renewable energy performance (F = 5.21, p = 0.012), and regression analysis confirmed solar (β = 0.45), wind (β = 0.30), and hydropower (β = 0.25) as significant predictors of energy efficiency (R² = 0.82). Correlation analysis showed strong positive relationships between energy efficiency and solar (r = 0.85), wind (r = 0.80), and hydropower (r = 0.78). Carbon emissions were reduced by 3.2 million tons in North America, 2.5 million tons in Europe, 1.8 million tons in Asia, and 180,000 metric tons in Africa annually. Cost analysis revealed substantial long-term savings, with Levelized Costs of Energy (LCOE) for solar at $50/MWh, wind at $55/MWh, and hydropower at $45/MWh. In Africa, the initial investment for renewable energy systems was ₦900,000, with annual operating costs of ₦45,000 and total savings of ₦400,000 over five years. Scalability analysis indicated energy capacity growth rates of 10% in North America, 12% in Europe, 15% in Asia, and 14% in Africa. These findings emphasize the importance of region-specific strategies, hybrid energy systems, and technological advancements in enhancing the efficiency, reliability, and sustainability of renewable energy systems globally.

Özet

This study analyzes the integration of solar, wind, and hydropower systems across North America, Europe, Asia, and Africa, focusing on their performance, economic feasibility, environmental impact, and scalability. Solar energy contributed 40%, 50%, and 35% in North America, Europe, and Asia, respectively, while wind energy led in Asia at 45%. In Africa, solar energy contributed 40%, wind 30%, and hydropower 30%. Hydropower exhibited the highest efficiency rates at 85% across all regions, followed by wind (75%) and solar (60%). In Africa, the efficiency rates for solar, wind, and hydropower were 88%, 87%, and 91%, respectively. ANOVA results revealed significant regional differences in renewable energy performance (F = 5.21, p = 0.012), and regression analysis confirmed solar (β = 0.45), wind (β = 0.30), and hydropower (β = 0.25) as significant predictors of energy efficiency (R² = 0.82). Correlation analysis showed strong positive relationships between energy efficiency and solar (r = 0.85), wind (r = 0.80), and hydropower (r = 0.78). Carbon emissions were reduced by 3.2 million tons in North America, 2.5 million tons in Europe, 1.8 million tons in Asia, and 180,000 metric tons in Africa annually. Cost analysis revealed substantial long-term savings, with Levelized Costs of Energy (LCOE) for solar at $50/MWh, wind at $55/MWh, and hydropower at $45/MWh. In Africa, the initial investment for renewable energy systems was ₦900,000, with annual operating costs of ₦45,000 and total savings of ₦400,000 over five years. Scalability analysis indicated energy capacity growth rates of 10% in North America, 12% in Europe, 15% in Asia, and 14% in Africa. These findings emphasize the importance of region-specific strategies, hybrid energy systems, and technological advancements in enhancing the efficiency, reliability, and sustainability of renewable energy systems globally.

🔖

Cite This Article

Olodu, D. D., Ihenyen, O. I., Inegbedion, F. (2025). Advances in Renewable Energy Systems: Integrating Solar, Wind, and Hydropower for a Carbon-Neutral Future. International Journal of New Findings in Engineering, Science and Technology, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 14–24. https://doi.org/10.61150/ijonfest.2025030102

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (31)

  1. Yian, Zhu., Siqi, Wu., Jiayi, Li., Qi, Jia., Tian, Tian, Zhang., Xuedan, Zhang., Dongliang, Han., Yufei, Tan. (2024). Towards a carbon-neutral community: Integrated renewable energy systems (IRES)–sources, storage, optimization, challenges, strategies and opportunities. Journal of Energy Storage, 10(1), 20-27. doi: 10.1016/j.est.2024.110663
  2. Oladotun, Victor, Ogunyemi., I., Ben, Ahmed., Omotosho, Abdulqudus, Ajibola. (2024). Innovative Systems for Renewable Energy Integration: Harnessing AI, Blockchain, and Hybrid Technologies – A Review. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, doi: 10.51244/ijrsi.2024.1110052
  3. Shivani, Pawar. (2024). Harnessing the Power of Renewable Energy: A Study of Sustainable Sources and Technologies. Journal for Research in Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, doi: 10.55544/jrasb.3.4.19
  4. Prasad, M., Ganesh, P., Vinay, K., Kumar., P.A., Mohanarao, A.S., Vasupalli, M. (2024). Renewable Energy Integration in Modern Power Systems: Challenges and Opportunities. E3S Web of Conferences, doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202459103002
  5. Ieva, Pakere., Ritvars, Freimanis., Signe, Allena-Ozolina., Pauls, Asaris. (2023). Cost-Optimal Sector Integration and Energy Balancing Strategies for Reaching Carbon Neutrality. doi: 10.7250/conect.2023.004
  6. Zamathula, Queen, Sikhakhane, Nwokediegwu., Kenneth, Ifeanyi, Ibekwe., Valentine, Ikenna, Ilojianya., Emmanuel, Augustine, Etukudoh., Olushola, Babatunde, Ayorinde. (2024). Renewable energy technologies in engineering: a review of current developments and future prospects. Engineering Science & Technology Journal, doi: 10.51594/estj.v5i2.800
  7. Omojola, Awogbemi., Daramy, Vandi, Von, Kallon. (2023). Towards the development of underutilized renewable energy resources in achieving carbon neutrality. Fuel Communications, doi: 10.1016/j.jfueco.2023.100099
  8. Krishna, Kumar, Mohanan, Nair., Garlapati, Nagababu. (2024). A comprehensive review of hybrid wind-solar energy systems. IOP Conference Series, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1372/1/012024
  9. Rajesh, K., Charles, J., Masoud, A., Majid, A. (2023). Advances and development of wind–solar hybrid renewable energy technologies for energy transition and sustainable future in India. Energy & Environment, 11(3), 142-157. doi: 10.1177/0958305x231152481
  10. Hussain, S.M., Rahim, M.H., Nadeem, Z., Fatima, I., Iqbal., Z., Asif., S., Javaid, N. (2017). The Trends of Integrating Renewable Energy Sources: A Survey. 14(2), 12-27. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-69811-3_56
  11. Fthenakis, V. (2020). Renewable Energy Storage Systems and Grid Integration. Energy Journal, 45(2), 175-190.
  12. GEO (2021). Global Energy Outlook: Renewable Energy Potential in Africa. Global Energy Organization.
  13. IRENA (2020). Renewable Energy Capacity Statistics 2020. International Renewable Energy Agency.
  14. Meghna., Piyush, Gupta. (2024). Integrating Renewable Energy and Advanced Technologies for Sustainable Electricity Generation: A Comprehensive Review. 15(1), 142-157. doi: 10.1109/innocomp63224.2024.00120
  15. Williams, B., MacDonald, A., & Callaway, P. (2020). Advances in Wind Turbine Technology: Efficiency and Cost Reduction. Wind Energy, 23(6), 905-920.
  16. Saleem, Raza., Ehsan, Ghasali., Muslim, Raza., Cheng, Chen., Bisheng, Li., Yasin, Orooji., Hong, Jia, Lin., Ceren, Karaman., Hasan, Karimi, Maleh., Nevin, Erk. (2022). Advances in technology and utilization of natural resources for achieving carbon neutrality and a sustainable solution to neutral environment. Environmental Research, 9(1), 22-34. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.115135
  17. Najam, H. (2023). Optimization of renewable energy supply for a carbon neutral society: Role of environmental regulations, sustainable finance, and financial innovation through the lens of game theory. Geological Journal, 22 (1), 1-15. doi: 10.1002/gj.4746
  18. Akinwale, Ishola. (2024). Global renewable energy transition in fossil fuel dependent regions. World Journal Of Advanced Research and Reviews, 8(3), 42-57. doi: 10.30574/wjarr.2024.24.1.3046
  19. Đình, Hòa, Nguyễn., Andrew, Chapman., Takeshi, Tsuji. (2023). Assessing the Optimal Contributions of Renewables and Carbon Capture and Storage toward Carbon Neutrality by 2050. Sustainability, 7(1), 12-28. doi: 10.3390/su151813447
  20. Darlington, Eze, Ekechukwu., Peter, Simpa. (2024). A comprehensive review of renewable energy integration for climate resilience. Engineering Science & Technology Journal, 13(1), 142-157. doi: 10.51594/estj.v5i6.1187
  21. Hoogwijk, M. (2020). Hydropower as a Reliable Source of Energy: A Global Review. Renewable Energy Research, 35(5), 1214-1223.
  22. IPCC (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
  23. Kai, Ernn, Gan., Oki, Taikan., Thian, Yew, Gan., Tim, Weis., Dai, Yamazaki., Holger, Schüttrumpf. (2023). Enhancing Renewable Energy Systems, Contributing to Sustainable Development Goals of United Nations and Building Resilience against Climate Change Impacts. Energy Technology, 11(2), 1-10. doi: 10.1002/ente.202300275
  24. Леся, Дубчак. (2024). Modern renewable energy sources and methods for detecting their defects. Kompûternì sistemi ta ìnformacìjnì tehnologìï, 12(1), 1-18. doi: 10.31891/csit-2024-2-3
  25. Lund, H. (2020). The Role of Solar Energy in the Global Transition to Clean Energy. Solar Energy Research, 62(3), 430-440.
  26. Ming, Z., Li, W., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Integrating Solar, Wind, and Hydropower for Energy Reliability. Energy Systems, 12(4), 356-370.
  27. Peng, Wei., Olusola, Bamisile., Humphrey, Adun., Dongsheng, Cai., Sandra, Obiora., Jian, Li., Qi, Huang. (2023). Bibliographical progress in hybrid renewable energy systems’ integration, modelling, optimization, and artificial intelligence applications: A critical review and future research perspective. Energy Sources Part A - Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects, 10(3), 1-15. doi: 10.1080/15567036.2023.2181888
  28. Maheswaran, R. (2024). Renewable Energy Systems. doi: 10.59646/res/234
  29. Rui, Qiu., Linyong, Hu., Rui, Wang. (2023). Editorial: New paths towards carbon-neutral future energy systems: planning, operation, and market design. Frontiers in Energy Research, 9(1), 1-17. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2023.1349129
  30. Vidal, C., Lamas, J., & Alvarez, D. (2019). Small-Scale Hydropower Systems: Feasibility and Environmental Impact. Journal of Sustainable Energy, 18(3), 142-157.
  31. Najam, H. (2023). Optimization of renewable energy supply for a carbon neutral society: Role of environmental regulations, sustainable finance, and financial innovation through the lens of game theory. Geological Journal, 22 (1), 1-15. doi: 10.1002/gj.4746