Journals / İş ve İnsan Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

The effects of gender stereotypes on entrepreneurial intentions

Kalıp yargıların girişimcilik niyetine etkisi

Pages
105–118
Publication Date
2020-04-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moreover, it was found that the important characteristics of entrepreneurship differ between genders.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the effects of stereotypes, gender, and women entrepreneurs in immediate surroundings on the entrepreneurial intentions of students were examined and the characteristics of entrepreneurship were investigated. 123 university students studying in Istanbul were recruited through convenience sampling.
📊
Key Findings & Data:On the other hand, the female entrepreneurship intentions of masculine stereotypes increased contrary to expectations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moreover, it was found that the important characteristics of entrepreneurship differ between genders.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:kadın girişimciliği · kalıp yargı etkisi · girişimcilik niyeti

Abstract

In this study, the effects of stereotypes, gender, and women entrepreneurs in immediate surroundings on the entrepreneurial intentions of students were examined and the characteristics of entrepreneurship were investigated. 123 university students studying in Istanbul were recruited through convenience sampling. The questionnaire consists of features used in defining entrepreneurship, stereotype intervention, entrepreneurship intention scale and demographic information section. The relationships between the variables were measured by t-test, two-way analysis of variance and Mann Whitney U test. The findings showed that the intention of entrepreneurship did not change between men and women under no stereotype condition. On the other hand, the female entrepreneurship intentions of masculine stereotypes increased contrary to expectations. Moreover, it was found that the important characteristics of entrepreneurship differ between genders. The results were discussed in the context of gender and recommendations were made to researchers and practitioners.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, kalıp yargıların, cinsiyetin ve yakın çevredeki kadın girişimcilerin, öğrencilerin girişimcilik niyetlerine etkisi incelenmiş ve girişimcilikte önemli bulunan özellikler araştırılmıştır. Çalışmaya, kolayda örneklem yoluyla ulaşılan 123 üniversite öğrencisi katılmıştır. Anket, girişimciliği tanımlarken kullanılan özellikler, kalıp yargı müdahalesi, girişimcilik niyeti ölçeği ve demografik bilgi bölümünden oluşmaktadır. Değişkenler arası ilişkiler t-testi, çift yönlü varyans analizi ve Mann Whitney U testi ile ölçülmüştür. Bulgular, kalıp yargıların sıfırlandığı koşulda, girişimcilik niyetinin kadın ve erkekler arasında fark oluşturmadığını göstermiştir. Erkeksi kalıp yargılar verilen kadınların ise girişimcilik niyeti tahmin edilenin aksine artmıştır. Bununla birlikte, girişimcilikte önemsenen özelliklerin cinsiyetler arasında farklılaştığı tespit edilmiştir. Sonuçlar toplumsal cinsiyet bağlamında tartışılmış, araştırmacılara ve uygulamacılara öneriler sunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

KALAFATOĞLU, Y. (2020). The effects of gender stereotypes on entrepreneurial intentions. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 105–118. https://ajindex.com/articles/164277

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Acs, Z. J. (2006). How is the entrepreneurship good for economic growth? Innovations, 1(1), 97–107
  2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
  3. Arıkan, C. (2016). Kadın girişimcilikte başarı ve başarıyı etkileyen faktörler: Bursa örneği. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14(3), 138-156.
  4. Bae, T. J., Qian, S., Miao, C., ve Fiet, J. O. (2014). The relationship between entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intentions: A meta–analytic review. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 38(2), 217-254.
  5. Balaban, Ö. ve Özdemir, Y. (2008). Girişimcilik Eğitiminin Girişimcilik Eğilimi Üzerindeki Etkisi: Sakarya Üniversitesi İİBF Örneği. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 133-147.
  6. Bird, B. (1988). Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: The case for intention. Academy of management Review, 13(3), 442 –453. BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları (2016). https://www.tr.undp.org/content/turkey/tr/home/sustainable-development-goals.html adresinden alınmıştır. Bogatyreva, K., Edelman, L. F., Manolova, T. S., Osiyevskyy, O. & Shirokova, G. (2019). When do entrepreneurial intentions lead to actions? The role of national culture. Journal of Business Research, 96, 309-321. Bozkurt Ç. Ö. & Alparslan, A. M. (2013). Girişimcilerde Bulunması Gereken Özellikler ile Girişimcilik Eğitimi: Girişimci ve Öğrenci Görüşleri. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 8(1), 7-28.
  7. Brunel, O., Laviolette, E. M. & Radu-Lefebvre, M. (2017). Role Models and Entrepreneurial Intention: The Moderating Effects of Experience, Locus of Control and Self-Esteem. Journal of enterprising culture, 25(2), 149-177.
  8. Chye Koh, H. (1996). Testing hypotheses of entrepreneurial characteristics: A study of Hong Kong MBA students. Journal of managerial Psychology, 11(3), 12-25.
  9. Crant, J.M. (1996). The proactive personality scale as a predictor of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Small Business Management, 34(3), 42–49.
  10. Cunningham, J. B. & Lischeron, J. 1991. Defining entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 29(1), 45-61.
  11. Daim, T., Dabic, M. & Bayraktaroglu, E. 2016. Students’ entrepreneurial behavior: international and gender differences. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 5(1), 19. Del Río, M. D. L. C., Peris-Ortiz, M., Álvarez-García, J. & Rueda-Armengot, C. (2016). Entrepreneurial intentions and entrepreneurship education to University students in Portugal. Technology, Innovation and Education, 2(1), 7. Eagly, A