SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İş ve İnsan Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Personality and Experience of Mobbing: Three Types of Mobbing and the Consequences at the Workplace

Kişilik ve Psikolojik Şiddete Uğrama: Psikolojik Şiddetin Üç Türü ve İşyerinde Sonuçları

Doruk UYSAL IRAK
Pages
55–66
Publication Date
2019-04-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

New interventions would be developed by focusing the differences between various mobbing experiences in the organizations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The study aims to investigate the relationship between neuroticism and types of mobbing.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data was collected from 329 employees and proposed model was tested through Structural Equation Modelling.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:New interventions would be developed by focusing the differences between various mobbing experiences in the organizations.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Zorbalık · Doyum · Nörotisizm

Abstract

The study aims to investigate the relationship between neuroticism and types of mobbing. It also focuses on the interaction between three types of mobbing with employee attitudes and the role of person-organization fit in this relationship. Data was collected from 329 employees and proposed model was tested through Structural Equation Modelling. Study showed that employees high in neuroticism were more likely report person-related mobbing compared to the work related or physical mobbing. Moreover, as expected work-related mobbing was related to job satisfaction, life satisfaction and turnover intentions where person-organization fit was a mediator. By emphasizing the differences between types of mobbing, new perspectives on how to deal with mobbing at workplace will be explored. New interventions would be developed by focusing the differences between various mobbing experiences in the organizations.

Özet

Bu araştırma nörotisizm ve farklı zorbalık türleri arasındaki ilişkileri incelemeyi amaçlamıştır. Ayrıca üç tür zorbalık ile çalışan tutumları ve birey-örgüt uyumu arasındaki ilişkilerin rolü de incelenmiştir. Üçyüzyirmidokuz çalışandan anket yöntemiyle toplanan veriler önerilen modelde Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli kullanılarak test edilmiştir. Araştırma sonuçlarına gore nörotisizm puanı yüksek çalışanlar diğer zorbalık türleriyle karşılaştırıldığında en çok birey odaklı zorbalığa maruz kaldıklarını rapor etmişlerdir. Ayrıca beklendiği gibi iş odaklı zorbalık, iş doyumu, yaşam doyumu ve işten ayrılma ile ilişkili bulunmuştur. Bu ilişkide birey-örgüt uyumunun da aracı değişken olduğu görülmüştür. Zorbalık türleri arasındaki farkların araştırılmasıyla işyerinde zorbalıkla nasıl mücadele edilebileceğine ilişkin yeni bakış açıları oluşturulabilecektir. Ayrıca işyerinde karşılaşılan farklı zorbalık yaşantıları arasındaki çeşitlilikler yeni müdahale tekniklerinin geliştirilmesine destek olacaktır

🔖

Cite This Article

IRAK, D. U. (2019). Personality and Experience of Mobbing: Three Types of Mobbing and the Consequences at the Workplace. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 55–66. https://ajindex.com/articles/164270

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Acar, P., Kıyak, M. & Sine, B. (2014). The relationship between organizational culture and mobbing: An application on construction companies. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 29(4), 281-298.
  2. Aquino, K. & Lamertz, K. (2004). A relational model of workplace victimization: Social roles and patterns of victimization in dyadic relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1023–1034. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1023 Archer, D. (1999). Exploring “bullying” culture in the paramilitary organization. International Journal of Manpower, 20, 94-105. doi:10.1108/01437729910268687 Arthur, Jr. W., Bell, S., Villado, A. J. & Doverspike, D. (2006). The use of person-organization fit in employment decision making: An assessment of its criterion-related validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 786-801. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.786 Assouline, M. & Meir, E.I. (1987). Meta-analysis of the relationship between congruence and well-being measures. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, 319-332. Doi: 0.1016/0001-879187900467
  3. Aydın, O. & Őcel, H. (2009). The Negative Act Questionnaire: A study for validity and Reliability. Turkish Psychological Articles, 12, 94-103.
  4. Björkqvist, K., Österman, K. & Hjelt-Back, M. (1994). Aggression among university Employees. Aggressive Behavior, 20,173-184. doi:10.1002/1098-2337
  5. Blau, P. M. (1964).
  6. Power and exchange in social life, New York: Wiley. Bowling, N. A., Beehr, T. A., Bennett, M. M. & Watson, C. P. (2010). Target personality and workplace victimization: A prospective analysis. Work and Stress, 24, 140-158. doi:10.1080/02678373.2010.489635 Brayfield, A. H. & Rothe, H.F. (1951). An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology. 35, 307- 311. doi:10.1037/h0055617 Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, D. & Klesh, J. (1979). The Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA. Cortina, L. M., Magley, V. J., Williams, J. H. & Langhout, R. D. (2001). Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 64–80. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.6.1.64 Costa, P. T., Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Still stable after all these years: Personality as a key to some issues in adulthood and old age. In P. B. Baltes & O. G. Brim, Jr. (Eds.), Life span development and behavior (Vol. 3, pp. 65-102). New York: Academic Press.
  7. Coyne, I., Seigne, E. & Randall, P. (2000). Predicting workplace victim status from Personality. European Journal of Work an