SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sakarya University Journal of Science / 2026 / Volume: 22 Issue: 2

Washing-sieving plant design for the beneficial use of marine dredged material and management of wastewater from washing-sieving process

Deniz dibi tarama malzemesinin faydalı kullanımı için yıkama-eleme tesisi tasarımı ve yıkama-eleme prosesi atıksuyunun yönetimi

H. Merve Başar(BOĞAZİÇİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR KALKINMA VE TEMİZ ÜRETİM UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ)
Barış Güzel(TÜBİTAK Marmara Araştırma Merkezi, Çevre ve Temiz Üretim Enstitüsü)
Pembe Özer-erdoğan(TÜBİTAK Marmara Araştırma Merkezi, Çevre ve Temiz Üretim Enstitüsü)
Selda Murat-hocaoğlu
Doğan Özel(Dizel Turbo Makine Limited Şirketi)
Şeyla Ergenekon(Ergenekon Ekolojik Danışmanlık San. ve Tic. Ltd. Şti)
G. Leyla Tolun(TÜBİTAK Marmara Araştırma Merkezi, Çevre ve Temiz Üretim Enstitüsü)
Pages
—
Publication Date
2018-04-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The first investment and operating costs of possible DM washing-sieving plant’s having a capacity of 1,500 m 3 /day are predicted to be 6,753,600 TL and 2,366,810 TL, respectively, and the unit cost is presumed as 6.3 TL/ton.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The management of dredging materials (DM), which is generated from marine dredging acitivities is a global problem.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The findings of this study indicate that DM can be used as a fine aggregate in concrete applications in case of subjecting to the washing-sieving pre-treatment process, generated washing-sieving wastewater does not involve any contaminant causing a risk to the sewage/sea discharge.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The first investment and operating costs of possible DM washing-sieving plant’s having a capacity of 1,500 m 3 /day are predicted to be 6,753,600 TL and 2,366,810 TL, respectively, and the unit cost is presumed as 6.3 TL/ton.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Marine Dredged Material · Beneficial Use · Washing-Sieving Plant

Abstract

The management of dredging materials (DM), which is generated from marine dredging acitivities is a global problem. DMs in our country are usually dumped at sea by barges and pose a serious risk to the aquatic environment. In this study, the characterization of the DMs excavated by dredging operations and the characterization of their washing wastewaters are determined and the design of a washing-sieving plant for the beneficial use of DM as a fine aggregate in concrete applications is carried out. Furthermore the cost analysis of the washing-sieving plant planned to be established for pilot regions is peformed. The findings of this study indicate that DM can be used as a fine aggregate in concrete applications in case of subjecting to the washing-sieving pre-treatment process, generated washing-sieving wastewater does not involve any contaminant causing a risk to the sewage/sea discharge. The first investment and operating costs of possible DM washing-sieving plant’s having a capacity of 1,500 m 3 /day are predicted to be 6,753,600 TL and 2,366,810 TL, respectively, and the unit cost is presumed as 6.3 TL/ton.

Özet

Bu çalışma, dip tarama faaliyetleri neticesinde ortaya çıkan dip tarama malzemelerinin (DTM) beton uygulamalarında ince agrega olarak faydalı kullanımı için bir yıkama-eleme tesisi tasarlanmasını, bu tesise ait ilk yatırım ve işletme maliyetlerinin ortaya konulmasını ve laboratuvar ölçekli DTM yıkama-eleme denemeleri sonucunda ortaya çıkan atıksuyun karakterizasyonunun ve yönetiminin belirlenmesini kapsamaktadır. Bu çalışma ile DTM’nin yıkama-eleme ön işlemine tabi tutulması durumunda yüksek klorür, sülfat ve su içeriğinin giderilerek ince agrega olarak beton çalışmalarında kullanılabileceği, oluşan yıkama-eleme atıksuyunun kanalizasyona/denize deşarjına risk oluşturacak herhangi bir kirletici içermediği tespit edilmiş olup olası 1.500 m 3 /gün kapasiteli DTM yıkama-eleme tesisinin ilk yatırım ve işletme maliyetlerinin sırasıyla 6.753.600 TL ve 2.366.810 TL ve birim maliyeti ise 6,3 TL/ton olarak hesaplanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Başar, H. M., Güzel, B., Özer-erdoğan, P., Murat-hocaoğlu, S., Özel, D., Ergenekon, Ş., Tolun, G. L. (2018). Washing-sieving plant design for the beneficial use of marine dredged material and management of wastewater from washing-sieving process. Sakarya University Journal of Science, Volume: 22 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.336784

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (48)

  1. C. Sheehan and J. Harrington, "Management of dredged material in the Republic of Ireland-a review," Waste Management, vol. 32, pp. 1031-1044, 2012.
  2. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), “Review of Maritime Transport,” UNCTAD/RMT/2015, United Nations Publication, Geneva, Switzerland, 2015.
  3. UDHB, “Deniz Ticareti 2014 Yılı İstatistikleri - Deniz Taşıtları, Denizyolu Taşıma, Teşvik ve Gemi Sanayi İstatistikleri,” Ulaştırma Denizcilik ve Haberleşme Bakanlığı, Ankara, Türkiye, 2015.
  4. R. N. Bray, “Environmental Aspects of Dredging,” IADC/CEDA and Taylor & Francis Publishers, London, United Kingdom, 2008
  5. R. Zentar, D. Wang, N. E. Abriak, M. Benzerzour, W. Chen, “Utilization of siliceous-aluminous fly ash and cement for solidification of marine sediments,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 35, pp. 856–863, 2012.
  6. H. Cho, J. Shim, J. Park, “Performance evaluation of solidification/ stabilization of dredged sediment using alkali-activated slag,” Desalination and Water Treatment, vol. 57, pp. 10159–10168, 2016.
  7. C. Alzieu, “Dredging and Marine Environment, State of the Art,” Ifremer, Plouzané, France, 1999.
  8. R. Boutin, “Improvement of Knowledge about the Outputs of Dredging Products as Mud in Sea: Phenomena Short Term- Close Field,” Lyon, France, 1999.
  9. J. Vermeulen, S. G. Van Dijk, J. T. C. Grotenhuis, W. H. Rulkens, “Quantification of physical properties of dredged sediments during physical ripening,” Geoderma, vol. 129, pp. 147–166, 2005.
  10. A. Netzband, A. L. Hakstege, K. Hamer, “Treatment and Confined Disposal of Dredged Material – Part 2: Dutch-German Exchange on Dredged Material,” Germany, 2002.
  11. L.A. Murray, “Dredged material as a resource,” Terra et Aqua, vol. 112, pp.3-10, 2008.
  12. V. Dubois, N. E Abriak, R. Zentar, G. Ballivy, “The use of marine sediments as a pavement base material,” Waste Management, vol. 29, pp. 774–782, 2009.
  13. OSPAR Commission, “JAMP Assessment of the Environmental Impact of Dumping of Wastes at Sea,” Oslo-Paris Commission, Biodiversity Series, London, United Kingdom, pp. 433, 2009.
  14. LIFE, “Methods for Management and Re-use of Polluted Sediments,” European Project Realized by in vivo, France, 2002 (in French).
  15. P. Grégoire, “Conceptual Model for Help with Multi-criterion Decision-taking in the Framework of the Negotiated Choice for a Marine Dredging Scenario,” France, pp. 281, 2004 (in French).
  16. F. Agostini, F. Skoczylas, Z. Lafhaj, “About a possible valorisation in cementicious materials of polluted sediments after treatment,” Cement and Concrete Composites, vol. 29, pp. 270–278, 2007.
  17. J. Lukens, “An Analysis of State, Territory & Commonwealth Policies Related to Dredging & Dredged Material Management,” Vol. I/II, OCRM/ CPD Coastal Management Program Policy Series, Technical Document 00–02, 2000.
  18. P. R. Krause, K. A. McDonnell, “The Beneficial Reuse of Dredged Material for Upland Disposal,” California, USA, 2000.
  19. J. P. Ulbricht, “Contaminated Sediments: Raw Materials for Bricks,” Symposium Dragage, 2002.
  20. Port of Baltimore, “Up for Grabs-innovative Solutions Are Being Found for Dredged Material,” The Port of Baltimore Magazine, Maryland, 2009.
  21. C. Sheehan, J. R. Harrington, J. D. Murphy, “A technical assessment of topsoil production from dredged material,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 54 pp. 1377–1385, 2010.
  22. D. J. Yozzo, P. Wilber, R. J. Will, “Beneficial use of dredged material for habitat creation, enhancement, and restoration in New York- New Jersey Harbor,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 73 pp. 39–52, 2004.
  23. K. Reine, D. Clarke, C. Dickerson, “Fishery resource utilization of a restored estuarine borrow pit: a beneficial use of dredged material case study,” Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 73, pp. 115–128, 2013.
  24. J. Limeira, M. Etxeberria, L. Agulló, D. Molina, “Mechanical and durability properties of concrete made with dredged marine sand,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 25, pp. 4165–4174, 2011.
  25. I. Said, A. Missaoui, Z. Lafhaj, “Reuse of Tunisian marine sediments in paving blocks: factory scale experiment,” Journal of Cleaner, Production, vol. 102 pp. 66–77, 2015.
  26. V. Cappuyns, V. Deweirt, S. Rousseau, “Dredged sediments as a resource for brick production: possibilities and barriers from a consumers’ perspective,” Waste Management, vol. 38, pp. 372–380, 2015.
  27. Y. T. Kim and B. Pradhan, “Mechanical and germination characteristics of stabilized organic soils,” Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, vol. 0, pp. 1-8, 2015.
  28. J. Park, Y. Son, S. Noh, T. Bong, “The suitability evaluation of dredged soil from reservoirs as embankment material,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 183, pp. 443-452, 2016.
  29. S. Lirer, B. Liguori, I. Capasso, A. Flora, D. Caputo, “Mechanical and chemical properties of composite materials made of dredged sediments in a fly-ash based geopolymer,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 191, pp. 1-7, 2017.
  30. V. Mymrin, J. C. Stella, C. B. Scremim, R. C. Y. Pan, F. G. Sanches, K. Alekseev, D. E. Pedroso, A. Molinetti, O. M. Fortini, “Utilization of sediments dredged from marine ports as a principal component of composite material,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 142, pp. 4041-4049, 2017.
  31. AYY, “Atık Yönetimi Yönetmeliği,” Resmi Gazete No.: 29314, Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı, Ankara, 2015.
  32. D. E. Averett and T. J. Estes, “Physical Separation Process Demonstrations-A Review of Three Dredging Projects,” DOER Technical Notes Collection, ERDC TN-DOER-T10, Vicksburg, MS, USA, 2011.
  33. J. Riordan, J. P. Murphy, J. R. Harrington, “Construction and Demolition Waste and Dredge Material as Landfill Liner in Ireland,” 1st Middle European Conference on Landfill Technology, 2008.
  34. M. A. Chikouche, E. Ghorbel, M. Bibi, “The possibility of using dredging sludge in manufacturing cements: optimization of heat treatment cycle and ratio replacement,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 106, pp. 330-341, 2016.
  35. W. Liu, H. Cui, Z. Dong, F. Xing, F. Zhang, T. Y. Lo, “Carbonation of concrete made with dredged marine sand and ıts effect on chloride binding,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 120, pp. 1-9, 2016.
  36. GLC, “Beneficial Uses of Great Lakes; Dredged Material: A Report of the Great Lakes Beneficial Use Task Force,” Great Lake Commission, Ann Arbor, USA, 2001.
  37. C. W. Mallory, M. A. Nawrocki, “Containment Area Facility Concepts for Dredged Material Separation, Drying and Rehandling,” Contract Report D-74-6, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, USA, 1974.
  38. P. J. Kelly, “In USACE/American Association of Port Authorities Quality Partnership Initiative-Emerging Technologies,” Miami River Project, VA: American Association of Port Authorities, USA, 2008.
  39. A. Taylor, J. McWilliams, H. Van Dam, B. Lammers, "Deepening, cleaning and processing sediment from the miami river,” Terra et Aqua, no. 103, pp. 23-30, 2006.
  40. D. E. Highley, L. E. Hetherington, T. J. Brown, D. J. Harrison, G. O. Jenkins, “The Strategic Importance of the Marine Aggregate Industry to the UK,” Research Report OR/07/019, Nottingham, United Kingdom, 2007.
  41. GLC, “Beneficial Use of Dredged Material in the Great Lakes,” Great Lakes Commission, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2013.
  42. Ravenna Port Authority, “Sistemazione Materiale da Scavo, Ravenna: AutoritàPortuale,” Ravenna, ITALY, 2011.
  43. G. Maurizio, "Mechanical treatment of dredged material: the malcontenta plant in the lagoon of venice,” Terra et Aqua, no. 76, pp. 22-29, 1999.
  44. TÜBİTAK MAM, “Deniz Dip Tarama Uygulamaları ve Tarama Malzemesinin Çevresel Yönetimi (DİPTAR),” Final Raporu, Proje No: 111G036, TÜBİTAK KAMAG 1007 Projesi, Kocaeli, Türkiye, 2016.
  45. USACE, 2001, Long-Term Management Strategy (LTMS) for the Placement of Dredged Material in the San Francisco Bay Region, Appendix R: Dredged material at landfills, USA.
  46. SM, 2012, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewaters, 22nd ed., APHA/AWWA/Water Environment Federation, American Public Health Association Publication, Washington, USA.
  47. T. J. Olin-Estes and M. R. Palermo, “Recovery of dredged material for beneficial use: the future role of physical separation processes,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 85, pp. 39-51, 2001.
  48. J. O. Kim, J. Choi, S. Lee, J. Chung, “Evaluation of hydrocyclone and post-treatment technologies for remediation of contaminated dredged sediments,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 166, pp. 94-102, 2016.