Journals / Sakarya University Journal of Science / 2026 / Volume: 22 Issue: 2

Removal of Phosphorus from Potato Chips Processing Wastewater by Electrocoagulation Process: Comparison of Electrode Material

Elektrokoagülasyon Prosesi ile Patates Cipsi üretim atıksularından fosfor giderimi: Elektrot Materyali karşılaştırması

Murat Solak(Düzce Üniversitesi)
Nazlı Baldan Pakdil(Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi)
Mehmet Kılıç(Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi)
Mehmet Kobya(Gebze Teknik Üniversitesi)
Pages
—
Publication Date
2018-04-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It has been determined that the orthophosphate and total phosphorus removal by the EC process is suitable with the second order reaction kinetics.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, removal of phosphorus from potato chips processing wastewater by electrocoagulation (EC) process was investigated by using Al and Fe electrodes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the EC model reactor in which either Al or Fe electrodes were used, the optimum hydraulic retention time was found to be 40 and 60 min, respectively, while the final pH was found to be 7.85 and 8.15, respectively, and the current density was found to be 65 A/m 2 for both electrode types.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It has been determined that the orthophosphate and total phosphorus removal by the EC process is suitable with the second order reaction kinetics.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:aluminum electrode · iron electrode · electrocoagulation

Abstract

In this study, removal of phosphorus from potato chips processing wastewater by electrocoagulation (EC) process was investigated by using Al and Fe electrodes. Operating parameters affecting phosphorus removal efficiency such as pH, current density and electrolysis time were optimized. In the EC model reactor in which either Al or Fe electrodes were used, the optimum hydraulic retention time was found to be 40 and 60 min, respectively, while the final pH was found to be 7.85 and 8.15, respectively, and the current density was found to be 65 A/m 2 for both electrode types. In case of using Al and Fe electrodes under these experimental conditions, the initial total phosphorus concentration of 54.4 mg/L decreased to 10.4 and 5.0 mg/L, respectively, and the initial orthophosphate concentration of 45.3 mg/L decreased to 5.9 and 2.9 mg/L, respectively. Considering the final pH value, it can be pointed out that the resultant effluent can be discharged without any pH adjustment. Considering the costs for electrodes, energy and chemical agents, operating costs for the continuous-flow EC model reactor were found out to be $1.14 and 0.76 per cubic meter wastewater for Al and Fe electrodes, respectively. It was determined that Fe electrodes are more effective than Al electrodes for the removal of phosphates from potato chips processing wastewaters, and that the operating costs are lower when Fe electrodes are used. It has been determined that the orthophosphate and total phosphorus removal by the EC process is suitable with the second order reaction kinetics.

🔖

Cite This Article

Solak, M., Pakdil, N. B., Kılıç, M., Kobya, M. (2018). Removal of Phosphorus from Potato Chips Processing Wastewater by Electrocoagulation Process: Comparison of Electrode Material. Sakarya University Journal of Science, Volume: 22 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.340123

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (33)

  1. Referans1 M. Uğurlu, The Removal of Some Inorganic Compounds from Paper Mill Effluents by the Electrocoagulation Method. G.U. Journal of Science, 17(3), 85-99, 2004.
  2. Referans2 A. Günay, E. Debik, Evsel Atıksulardan Biyolojik Nütrient Giderimi. I. Atıksu Sempozyumu, 22-24 Haziran, Kayseri, 57-63, 1998.
  3. Referans3 S.E. Manahan, Frontmatter, Fundamentals of Environmental Chemistry. Boca Raton, CRC Press LLC, 352p, 2001.
  4. Referans4 A. Samsunlu, 2006. Atıksuların Arıtılması. Birsen Yayınevi, 644s, İstanbul.
  5. Referans5 V.L. Snoeyink, D. Jenkins, Water Chemistry, John-Wiley and Sons, 451p, United States of America, 1980.
  6. Referans6 E. Oğuz, A. Gürses, N. Canplat, Removal of Phosphate from Wastewaters. Cement and Concrete Research, 33, 1109-1112, 2003.
  7. Referans7 B. Kıvanç, Adsorpsiyon ve İyon Değişimi Yöntemi ile Sulu Çözeltilerden Fosfat Gideriminin İncelenmesi. Osmangazi Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 147s, Eskişehir, 2011.
  8. Referans8 D. Dolar, K. Kosutic, B. Vucic, RO/NF Treatment of Wastewater from Fertilizer Factory: Removal of Fluoride and Phosphate. Desalination, 265, 237-241. 2011.
  9. Referans9 T. Tunçal, Management of Phosphorus Removal in Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants. chenuz Eylül University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Ph.d. Thesis, 242p, İzmir, 2008.
  10. Referans10 S. Tanada, M. Kabayama, N. Kawasaki, T. Sakiyama, T. Nakamura, M. Araki, T. Tamura, Removal of Phosphate by Aluminum Oxide Hydroxide. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 257,135-140, 2003.
  11. Referans11 Ş. İrdemez, N. Demircioğlu, Y.Ş. Yıldız, The Effects of pH on Phosphate Removal from Wastewater by Electrocoagulation with Iron Plate Electrodes. Journal of Hazardous Materials, B137, 1231-1235, 2006.
  12. Referans12 Metcalf and Eddy, Wastewater Engineering: Treatment, Disposal and Reuse, Third Edition, McGraw-Hill Inc., Civil Engineering Series, 1334p, New York, 1991.
  13. Referans13 M.F. Pouet, A. Grasmick, Urban Wastewater Treatment by Electrocoagulation and Flotation. Water Science Technology, 31, 275-283, 1995.
  14. Referans14 E.A. Vik, D.A. Carlson, A.S. Eikum, E.T. Gjessing, Electrocoagulation of Potable Water. Water Reserach, 18, 1355-1360, 1984.
  15. Referans15 J.S. Do, M.L. Chen, Decolourisations of Dye-Containing Solutions by Electrocoagulation, Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 24, 785-790, 1994.
  16. Referans16 American Public Health Association (APHA), Standard Methods for the Examination of Waste and Wastewater (19th ed.), Washington, 2005.
  17. Referans17 http://www.epdk.org.tr/TR/Dokumanlar/TDB/Elektrik
  18. Referans18 http://metalavm.com/aluminyum-plaka
  19. Referans19 http://www.lme.com.tr/teklifhazirla.php?id=697
  20. Referans20 A. Dedeli, Fosfatlama Banyosu Atıksularının Elektrokimyasal Arıtımı, Gebze Yüksek Teknoloji Enstitüsü, Mühendislik ve Fen bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 120s, Gebze, 2008.
  21. Referans21 M. Kobya, E. Demirbaş, A.Dedeli, M.T. Şensoy, Treatment of Rinse Water form Zinc Phosphate Coating by Batch and Continuous Electrocoagulation Procesess. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 173, 326-334, 2010.
  22. Referans22 M. Behbahani, M.R. Moghaddam Alavi, M, Arami, A Comparison between Aluminum and Iron Electrodes on Removal of Phosphate from Aqueous Solutions by Electrocoagulation Process. International Journal of Environmental Research, 5(2), 403-412, 2011.
  23. Referans23 Ş.İrdemez, N. Demircioğlu, Y.Ş. Yıldız, Z. Bingül, The Effects of Current Density and Phosphate Concentration on Phosphate Removal from Wastewater by Electrocoagulation Using Aluminum and Iron Plate Electrodes. Separation and Purification Technology, 52, 218-223, 2006.
  24. Referans24 M. Rebhun, M., Lurie, Control of Organic Matter by Coagulation and Floc Separation. Water Science and Technology, 27(11), 1-20.1993.
  25. Referans25 M.Y.A. Mollah, P. Morkovsky, J.A.G. Gomes, M.Kesmez, J. Parga, D.L. Cocke, Fundamentals, Present and Future Perspectives of Electrocoagulation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, B114, 199–210, 2004.
  26. Referans26 M. Bayramoğlu, M. Eyvaz, M. Kobya, Treatment of the Textile Wastewater by Electrocoagulation: Economical Evaluation, Chemical Engineering. Eng. J., 128, 155–161, 2007.
  27. Referans27 A.H. Essadki, M. Bennajah, B. Gourich, C. Vial, M. Azzi, H. Delmas, Electrocoagulation/Electroflotation in an External-Loop Airlift Reactor-Application to the Decolorization of Textile Dye Wastewater: A Case Study. Chemical Engineering Processing, 47, 1211-1223, 2008.
  28. Referans28 J. Jiang, N. Graham, C. Andre, G. Kelsall, N. Brandon, Laboratuary study of Electrocoagulation-Flotation for Water Treatment. Water Research, 36, 4064-4078, 2002.
  29. Referans29 Z. Karcıoğlu Karakaş, M.T. Yılmaz, A.E. Yılmaz, Endüstriyel Atıksulardan Sülfat Koagülantı Kullanılarak Kimyasal Koagülasyon Yöntemi ile Bor Giderimi. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2(1), 15-22, 2012.
  30. Referans30 P.N. Endyuskin, S.V.Selezenkin, K.M. Dyumaev, Electrochemical purication of wastewaters from production of organic-dyes. Journal of Applied Chemistry, 56, 1100-1102, 1983.
  31. Referans31 A.E. Wilcock, Textile Chem. Colorist, 24(11), 29, 1992.
  32. Referans32 M.Y.A. Mollah, R. Schennach, J.R. Parga, D.L. Cocke, Electrocoagulation (EC) Science and Applications. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 84, 29-41, 2001.
  33. Referans33 M. Kobya, H. Hiz, E. Şentürk, C. Aydıner, E. Demirbaş, Treatment of Potato Chips Manufacturing Wastewater by Electrocoagulation. Desalination, 190, 201–211, 2006.