Journals / Sakarya University Journal of Science / 2026 / Volume: 22 Issue: 2

Fire Simulation and Investigation of the Smoke Removal Strategies for Sakarya University M-7 Hall

Sakarya Üniversitesi M-7 Binası için Yangın Simülasyonu ve Duman Tahliye Stratejilerinin İncelenmesi

Pages
—
Publication Date
2018-04-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

From the simulation results slowest smoke propagation in the building obtained at the smoke removal fan used case.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study several strategies for smoke removal in M7 building of engineering faculty are developed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In these scenarios the air velocity is kept in the lowest level and the developed model was investigated by using FDS software.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:From the simulation results slowest smoke propagation in the building obtained at the smoke removal fan used case.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Fire · Plume Dispersal and Removal · Fire Simulation

Abstract

In this study several strategies for smoke removal in M7 building of engineering faculty are developed. In these scenarios the air velocity is kept in the lowest level and the developed model was investigated by using FDS software. Five scenarios were examined depending on windows and skylighting open or close positions, and a case having smoke removal fan mounted in the skylighting area. All simulations were run with evocation doors in open position. Scenarios are; all windows casements are closed, all windows single casements are open, all windows casements are open, skylighting open while all windows casements close and finally with smoke removal fan active at the skylighting area. From the simulation results slowest smoke propagation in the building obtained at the smoke removal fan used case.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, bina içi hava hızını mümkün olabilecek en az seviyede arttıran farklı duman tahliye senaryoları ve stratejileri FDS yazılımı ile bilgisayar ortamında modellenerek incelenmiştir. M-7 binası pencereleri ve binanın terasındaki ışıklık bölgesinin açık ve kapalı olması durumu ile ışıklık bölgesine duman tahliye fanı eklenmesi durumuna olmak üzere beş farklı senaryo incelenmiştir. Tüm simülasyonlar yangın merdiveni acil çıkış kapıları açık konumda iken çalıştırılmıştır. Bu senaryolar; tüm pencereler kapalı , tüm pencerelerin tek kanatları açık, tüm pencerelerin her iki kanadı açık, tüm pencereler kapalı iken ışıklık penceresi açık ve son olarak ışıklık bölgesinde duman tahliye fanı çalıştırılması durumları olarak sıralanabilir. Simülasyon sonuçları tüm binaya duman yayılımının en uzun sürdüğü senaryonun fanın kullanıldığı durum için ortaya çıktığını göstermiştir .

🔖

Cite This Article

Coşkun, G., Demir, U., Soyhan, H. S. (2018). Fire Simulation and Investigation of the Smoke Removal Strategies for Sakarya University M-7 Hall. Sakarya University Journal of Science, Volume: 22 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.333526

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. L. Fang, P. V. Nielsen, H. Brohus, “Investigation on smoke movement and smoke control for atrium in green and sustainable buildings”, Aalborg University, Department of Civil Engineering Technical Report No. 32, 2007
  2. J. Jie, L. Kaiyuan, Z. Wei, H. Ran, “Experimental investigation on influence of smoke venting velocity and vent height on mechanical smoke exhaust efficiency”, Journal of Hazardous Materials, Cilt 177, Sayı 1–3, pp. 209-215, 2010
  3. K. McGrattan, R McDermott, S. Hostikka, J. Floyd, “NIST Special Publication 1019 Fire Dynamics Simulator (Version 6.1.2) User's Guide”, NIST, 2015
  4. W.K. Chow, “Application of Computational fluid dynamics in building services engineering”, Build. Environ. Cilt 31, pp. 425–436, 1996
  5. G. W. Zou, W. K. Chow, “Evaluation of the Field Model, Fire Dynamics Simulator, for a Specific Experimental Scenario”, Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, 15: 77, 2005
  6. L.H. Hua, N.K. Fong b, L.Z. Yang a, W.K. Chowb, Y.Z. Li a, R. Huoa, “Modeling fire-induced smoke spread and carbon monoxidetransportation in a long channel: Fire Dynamics Simulator comparisons with measured data”, Journal of Hazardous Materials, cilt 140, pp. 293–298, 2007
  7. V.A. Oven, N. Cakici, “Modelling the evacuation of high-rise Office building in İstanbul”, Fire Safety Journal, vol. 44, pp. 1-15, 2009
  8. T-S. Shen, Y-H. Huang, S.-W. Chien, “Using fire dynamic simulation (FDS) to reconstruct an arson fire scene”, Building and Environment, vol. 43, pp. 1036– 1045, 2008
  9. Z. Xu, X. Z. Lu, H. Guan, C. Chen, and A. Z. Ren, "A virtual reality based fire training simulator with smoke hazard assessment capacity," Advances in Engineering Software, vol. 68, pp. 1-8, 2014
  10. X.G. Zhanga, Y.C. Guoa, C.K. Chanb, W.Y. Lina, “Numerical simulations on fire spread and smoke movement in an underground car park”, Building and Environment, cilt 42, pp. 3466–3475, 2007
  11. X. Zhang, X. Wang, Y. Zhou, “Numerical simulation study on bus fire”, International Conference on Remote Sensing, Environment and Transportation Engineering, 2011. [12] http://www.thunderheadeng.com/pyrosim/ (Erişim tarihi: 15.04.2017
  12. Seçilmiş Göstergelerle Sakarya 2013, Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. Yayın No: 4218 ISSN: 1307-0894