Journals / Sakarya University Journal of Science / 2018 / Volume: 22 Issue: 6

The First Indoor Radon Gas Measurement at Historical Places in Cappadocia, Nigde, Turkey

Vakkas Bozkurt(Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversity, Science and Art Faculty, Department of Physics)0000-0003-4651-0447
Sefa Ertürk(Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversity, Science and Art Faculty, Department of Physics)0000-0003-4051-9096
Pages
—
Publication Date
2018-12-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The average effective dose of Radon was calculated for the Nigde Museum, the Sungur Bey, the Alaeddin, the Disari mosques and the Ak Medrese Culture House in Nigde and was found to be approximately 0.137 mSv/y, 0.062 mSv/y, 0.103 mSv/y, 0.084 mSv/y and 0.327 mSv/y respectively

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to determine the concentration of Radon and its annual effective dose at the Nigde Museum and in a number of historical places namely the Sungur Bey, the Alaeddin, the Disari mosque and the Ak Medrese Culture House in Cappadocia, Nigde, Turkey by using a nuclear track detector CR-39 to ascertain how much Radon concentration affects the people who are working in or visiting such places.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Nuclear track detectors CR-39 were used for measurement for 132 days at the Nigde Museum, and for 63 days in the historical places.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The average effective dose of Radon was calculated for the Nigde Museum, the Sungur Bey, the Alaeddin, the Disari mosques and the Ak Medrese Culture House in Nigde and was found to be approximately 0.137 mSv/y, 0.062 mSv/y, 0.103 mSv/y, 0.084 mSv/y and 0.327 mSv/y respectively
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Radon · environmental radioactivity · track detectors

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the concentration of Radon and its annual effective dose at the Nigde Museum and in a number of historical places namely the Sungur Bey, the Alaeddin, the Disari mosque and the Ak Medrese Culture House in Cappadocia, Nigde, Turkey by using a nuclear track detector CR-39 to ascertain how much Radon concentration affects the people who are working in or visiting such places. Nuclear track detectors CR-39 were used for measurement for 132 days at the Nigde Museum, and for 63 days in the historical places. The exposed nuclear track detectors were then sent to the Sarayköy Nuclear Research and Training Center (SANAEM) to determine of Radon-222. The average Radon concentration results obtained for the Nigde Museum, the Sungur Bey, the Alaeddin, the Disari mosques and the Ak Medrese Culture House were 13.0±2.94 Bq/m 3 , 31.67±3.86 Bq/m 3 , 52.0±5.72 Bq/m 3 , 42.67±19.34 Bq/m 3 and 31.0±4.55 Bq/m 3 respectively. The average effective dose of Radon was calculated for the Nigde Museum, the Sungur Bey, the Alaeddin, the Disari mosques and the Ak Medrese Culture House in Nigde and was found to be approximately 0.137 mSv/y, 0.062 mSv/y, 0.103 mSv/y, 0.084 mSv/y and 0.327 mSv/y respectively

🔖

Cite This Article

Bozkurt, V., Ertürk, S. (2018). The First Indoor Radon Gas Measurement at Historical Places in Cappadocia, Nigde, Turkey. Sakarya University Journal of Science, Volume: 22 Issue: 6. https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.393479

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection) ICRP Draft report for consultation, ICRP ref 4829-9671-6554 (2011).[2] TAEK, Radyasyon Güvenliği Yönetmeliği Sayı: 23999, Madde 10 ve Madde 37 (24.03.2000).[3] International commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), ICRP Publication 65, Annals of the ICRP. Vol. 23. Oxford: Pergamon Press (1993).[4] Matiullah, Fariha Malik and Muhammad Rafique. “Indoor Radon monitoring near an in situ leach mining site in D G Khan, Pakistan”, J. Radiol. Prot., 2012, 32, 427–437.[5] Rehman Fazal-ur, Jamil K., Zakaullah M., AbuJarad, F., Mujahid, S.A. “Experimental and Monte Carlo simulation studies of an open cylindrical Radon monitoring device using CR-39 detector.” Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2003, 65, 243–254.[6] Radosys User’s Manual. Radosys Technical Specification, www.radosys.com(2000).[7] UNSCEAR Sources and effects of ionizing radiation, Report to General Assembly with Scientific Annexes, (2000).Technology, vol. 28, no. 1–2, pp. 109–116, 2005.
  2. ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection) ICRP Draft report for consultation, ICRP ref 4829-9671-6554 (2011).[2] TAEK, Radyasyon Güvenliği Yönetmeliği Sayı: 23999, Madde 10 ve Madde 37 (24.03.2000).[3] International commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), ICRP Publication 65, Annals of the ICRP. Vol. 23. Oxford: Pergamon Press (1993).[4] Matiullah, Fariha Malik and Muhammad Rafique. “Indoor Radon monitoring near an in situ leach mining site in D G Khan, Pakistan”, J. Radiol. Prot., 2012, 32, 427–437.[5] Rehman Fazal-ur, Jamil K., Zakaullah M., AbuJarad, F., Mujahid, S.A. “Experimental and Monte Carlo simulation studies of an open cylindrical Radon monitoring device using CR-39 detector.” Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2003, 65, 243–254.[6] Radosys User’s Manual. Radosys Technical Specification, www.radosys.com(2000).[7] UNSCEAR Sources and effects of ionizing radiation, Report to General Assembly with Scientific Annexes, (2000).Technology, vol. 28, no. 1–2, pp. 109–116, 2005.