Journals / Sakarya University Journal of Science / 2026 / Volume: 23 Issue: 5

Effect of Wet Soil on Thermal Performance of Air-Fluid Ground Heat Exchanger for Heating

Ufuk Durmaz(SAKARYA UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-5534-8117
Ozlem Bablak Ergun(SAKARYA UNIVERSITY)
Mustafa Ozdemir(SAKARYA UNIVERSITY)
Pages
—
Publication Date
2019-10-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The heat transfer rate has been increased by 46.28% compared to dry soil application for the same air velocity speed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The energy crises that emerged after the economic problems in the world increased the interest in alternative energy resources.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this research, the performance of soil in an artificial pool was examined in terms of heat transfer.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The heat transfer rate has been increased by 46.28% compared to dry soil application for the same air velocity speed.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:ground base heating · earth air heat exchanger · wet soil

Abstract

The energy crises that emerged after the economic problems in the world increased the interest in alternative energy resources. The effects of global warming, which has a serious threat, will be reduced by the more efficient use of these energy resources. In this study, the thermal effects of wet soil were investigated experimentally using a ground source heat exchanger (GHE), which is an alternative energy resource, in an area on the Esentepe campus of Sakarya University. Researches on this subject are mostly directed to dry soil applications. In this research, the performance of soil in an artificial pool was examined in terms of heat transfer. By means of the artificial pool formed under the ground, it is aimed to increase in heat transfer between the soil and the process fluid. In the experiments which are conducted, air is used as the process fluid. The system has a significant advantage in certain temperature ranges due to the passive heating method, in other words, the process fluid can be circulated under the soil without using a compressor. The purpose of this method is to reduce the cost of heating in the winter season. The temperature difference at GHE inlet and outlet is approximately 9.07 °C in the experiments. The heat transfer rate has been increased by 46.28% compared to dry soil application for the same air velocity speed.

🔖

Cite This Article

Durmaz, U., Yalçınkaya, O., Ergun, O. B., Ozdemir, M. (2019). Effect of Wet Soil on Thermal Performance of Air-Fluid Ground Heat Exchanger for Heating. Sakarya University Journal of Science, Volume: 23 Issue: 5. https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.541815

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. A. Hepbasli, “Experimental study of a closed loop vertical ground source heat pump system: Hepbasli, A. et al. Energy Conversion and Management, 2003, 44, (4), 527–548,” Fuel Energy Abstr., vol. 44, no. 4, p. 254-, 2003.
  2. M. Inalli and H. Esen, “Experimental thermal performance evaluation of a horizontal ground-source heat pump system,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 24, no. 14–15, pp. 2219–2232, 2004.
  3. G. Mihalakakou, M. Santamouris, D. Asimakopoulos, and I. Tselepidaki, “Parametric prediction of the buried pipes cooling potential for passive cooling applications,” Sol. Energy, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 163–173, 1995.
  4. Y. Song, Y. Yao, and W. Na, “Impacts of soil and pipe thermal conductivity on performance of horizontal pipe in a ground-source heat pump,” Proc. Sixth Int. Conf. Enhanc. Build. Oper., no. 2, pp. 2–7, 2006.
  5. J. Xi, A. Y. Li, B. M. Liu, and R. Z. Wang, “Study on the thermal effect of the ground heat exchanger of GSHP in the eastern China area.pdf,” Energy, pp. 56–65, 2017.
  6. U. Desideri, N. Sorbi, L. Arcioni, and D. Leonardi, “Feasibility study and numerical simulation of a ground source heat pump plant, applied to a residential building,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 31, no. 16, pp. 3500–3511, 2011.
  7. H. Esen, M. Inalli, and M. Esen, “A techno-economic comparison of ground-coupled and air-coupled heat pump system for space cooling,” Build. Environ., vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1955–1965, 2007.
  8. Y. Al-Ameen, A. Ianakiev, and R. Evans, “Recycling construction and industrial landfill waste material for backfill in horizontal ground heat exchanger systems,” Energy, vol. 151, pp. 556–568, 2018.
  9. İ. Bulut, Hüsamettin & demirtaş, Yunus & Karadağ, R & Hilali, “Experimental Analysis of an Earth Tube Ventilation System under Hot and Dry Climatic Conditions.,” 8th Mediterr. Congr. Heat. Vent. Air-Conditioning-Climamed, no. October, 2015.
  10. U. Durmaz and M. Ozdemir, “An experimental study on the soil-based natural cooling,” Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2018.
  11. Y. Nam and H. B. Chae, “Numerical simulation for the optimum design of ground source heat pump system using building foundation as horizontal heat exchanger,” Energy, vol. 73, pp. 933–942, 2014.
  12. U. D. O. Yalcinkaya, “Experimental investigation on the ground heat exchanger with air fluid,” Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., no. 0123456789, pp. 1–6, 2019.
  13. S. J. Kline and F. A. McClintock, “Describing uncertainties in single-sample experiments,” Mechanical engineering, vol. 75, no. 1. pp. 3–8, 1953.
  14. R. J. Moffat, “Describing the uncertainties in experimental results,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3–17, 1988.
  15. A. Hepbasli, “Experimental study of a closed loop vertical ground source heat pump system: Hepbasli, A. et al. Energy Conversion and Management, 2003, 44, (4), 527–548,” Fuel Energy Abstr., vol. 44, no. 4, p. 254-, 2003.