Journals / Sakarya University Journal of Science / 2026 / Volume: 24 Issue: 4

On the Design of 2D Dynamic Drawings with Euklid DynaGeo

Engin Can(SAKARYA UYGULAMALI BİLİMLER ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TEKNOLOJİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-4105-6460
Pages
—
Publication Date
2020-08-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For this aim, some applications are displayed and finally, clearly presented how Euklid DynaGeo serves the users to realize the constructional geometrical drawings.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Nowadays in the plane geometry with the advancement of technology, the geometric constructions are designed and processed using the 2D dynamic geometry software’s (DGSs).
📊
Key Findings & Data:In order to use such programs, users should have the necessary information and skill.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For this aim, some applications are displayed and finally, clearly presented how Euklid DynaGeo serves the users to realize the constructional geometrical drawings.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:dynamic geometry software · Euklid DynaGeo · plane geometry

Abstract

Nowadays in the plane geometry with the advancement of technology, the geometric constructions are designed and processed using the 2D dynamic geometry software’s (DGSs). In order to use such programs, users should have the necessary information and skill. In this paper, pieces of information some of the known software are given, but more proposed Euklid DynaGeo is presented, in which users can draw and recognize the function graphs more easily. For this aim, some applications are displayed and finally, clearly presented how Euklid DynaGeo serves the users to realize the constructional geometrical drawings.

🔖

Cite This Article

Can, E. (2020). On the Design of 2D Dynamic Drawings with Euklid DynaGeo. Sakarya University Journal of Science, Volume: 24 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.709397

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Cantürk-Günhan, B., & Açan, H. “The effect of using dynamic geometry software on success of geometry: A meta-analysis study”, Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 7(1), pp. 1-23, 2016.
  2. Uğur, B., Urhan, S., Akgün Kocadere, S.,"Geometrik Cisimler Konusunun Dinamik Geometri Yazılımı ile Öğretimi", Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 10, S. 339-366, 2016.
  3. Baki, A., Özpınar, İ., “Logo destekli geometri öğretimi materyalinin öğrencilerin akademik başarılarına etkileri ve öğrencilerin uygulama ile ilgili görüşleri”, Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 34(3), S.153-164, 2007.
  4. Demirbilek, M, Özkale, A., "GeoGebra Kullanımının Önlisans Matematik Öğretimine Etkinliğinin İncelenmesi", Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi 8, S. 98-123, 2014.
  5. Delice, A.& Karaaslan, G., “Dinamik geometri yazılımları ile çokgenler konusunda hazırlanan etkinliklerin öğrenci performansı ve öğretmen görüşlerine yansıması”, Karaelmas Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 3, S. 133-148, 2015.
  6. Akyar, K. B. “Öklid geometrisi öğretiminde dinamik geometri yazılımları kullanımının 11.sınıf öğrencilerinin geometriye yönelik tutumlarına ve akademik başarılarına etkisi”, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2010.
  7. Aydoğan, A., “The effect of dynamic geometry use together with open-ended explorations in sixth grade students’ performances in polygons and similarity and congruency of polygons”, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2007.
  8. Orçanlı H. B., Orçanlı K., “Bilgisayar destekli geometri öğretimi hakkında öğrenci görüşlerinin değerlendirilmesi”, Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 25(3), S. 55-70, 2016.
  9. Chang, C.Y, “Comparing the Impacts of a Problem-Based Computer-Assisted Instruction and the Direct-Interactive Teaching Method on Student Science Achievement”, Journal of Science Educational and Technology, 10(2), pp. 147-153, 2001.
  10. A. B. Anthony & L. M. Clark, “Examining Dilemmas of Practice Associated With the Integration of Technology Into Mathematics Classrooms Serving Urban Students”, Urban Education, 46(6), pp. 1300-1331, 2011.
  11. C. Laborde, “Technology as an instrument for teachers”, Paper presented at the Proceedings of Working Group 4: Resources and Technology throughout the History of ICMI, Rome, Italy, 2008.
  12. Yılmaz G.K., “The Effect of Dynamic Geometry Software and Physical Manipulatives on Candidate Teachers Transformational Geometry Success”, Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(5), pp. 1417-1435, 2015.
  13. M.T. Battista, "The Development of Geometric and Spatial Thinking", In Lester, Jr., F.K. (ed.). Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Charlotte, NC: Information Age and the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. pp. 843–903, 2007.
  14. http://www.dynageo.com/