SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sakarya University Journal of Science / 2026 / Volume: 30 Issue: 3

Temperature Estimation of A GEO Satellite Solar Array Using Analytical and Numerical Methods, With Comparison to Orbital Temperatures

Murat Bulut(DUZCE UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING, DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING)0000-0002-9024-7722
Nedim Sözbir(DUZCE UNIVERSITY, RECTORATE)0000-0003-4633-2521
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-06-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was observed that the analytically derived results showed a moderate agreement with both the commercial software outcomes and in-orbit temperature measurements, with absolute deviations of 8-10 oC relative to in-orbit data and 9-14 oC relative to ESATAN, which are considered acceptable for preliminary thermal sizing of solar arrays in GEO given the simplified 1-D analytical approach employed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Satellites obtain all their energy from the Sun when exposed to sunlight and rely on batteries during eclipses.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The satellite's temperature before entering the eclipse, during the maximum eclipse duration of 72 minutes, and upon exiting the eclipse can be determined analytically.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was observed that the analytically derived results showed a moderate agreement with both the commercial software outcomes and in-orbit temperature measurements, with absolute deviations of 8-10 oC relative to in-orbit data and 9-14 oC relative to ESATAN, which are considered acceptable for preliminary thermal sizing of solar arrays in GEO given the simplified 1-D analytical approach employed.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Solar array · Satellite thermal control · Geostationary Earth orbit

Abstract

Satellites obtain all their energy from the Sun when exposed to sunlight and rely on batteries during eclipses. The temperature of solar arrays plays a crucial role in power generation. During an eclipse, the power for the satellite's systems is supplied entirely by the batteries. The satellite's temperature before entering the eclipse, during the maximum eclipse duration of 72 minutes, and upon exiting the eclipse can be determined analytically. Solar array temperature must be determined, because it is a crucial factor affecting its efficiency. In the current study, the solar array temperature in geostationary orbit was predicted using a 3-axis stabilized satellite. A one-dimensional analytical equation was used to calculate temperature values that were then compared with the results from commercial software and the measured temperatures in orbit. Analytical predictions estimated the solar array temperatures as 55.1°C, 49.7°C, and 52.3°C for winter solstice, summer solstice, and equinox, respectively, while ESARAD/ESATAN simulations gave 64.4°C, 55.7°C, and 62.4°C. In-orbit measurements were lower at 45.6°C, 41.2°C, and 43.7°C, with an average deviation of ~17% between analytical and measured values, primarily due to simplified assumptions in the analytical model and the detailed geometric and radiative effects captured in the simulations. It was observed that the analytically derived results showed a moderate agreement with both the commercial software outcomes and in-orbit temperature measurements, with absolute deviations of 8-10 oC relative to in-orbit data and 9-14 oC relative to ESATAN, which are considered acceptable for preliminary thermal sizing of solar arrays in GEO given the simplified 1-D analytical approach employed.

🔖

Cite This Article

Bulut, M., Sözbir, N. (2026). Temperature Estimation of A GEO Satellite Solar Array Using Analytical and Numerical Methods, With Comparison to Orbital Temperatures. Sakarya University Journal of Science, Volume: 30 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.1776196

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (30)

  1. C. L. Foster, M. L. Tinker, G. S. Nurre, and W. A. Till, “Solar-array-induced disturbance of the Hubble Space Telescope pointing system,” J. Spacecr. Rockets, vol. 32, pp. 634–644, 1995, doi: 10.2514/3.26664.
  2. E. A. Thornton and Y. A. Kim, “Thermally induced bending vibrations of a flexible rolled-up solar array,” J. Spacecr. Rockets, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 438–448, 1993, doi: 10.2514/3.25550.
  3. T. Beck, B. S. Luthi, G. Messina, D. Piazza, K. Seiferlin, and N. Thomas, “Thermal analysis of a reflective baffle designed for space applications,” Acta Astronaut., vol. 69, pp. 323–334, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2011.03.014.
  4. J. A. Foster and G. S. Aglietti, “The thermal environment encountered in space by a multifunctional solar array,” Aerosp. Sci. Technol., vol. 14, pp. 213–219, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2009.12.008.
  5. J. D. Johnston and E. A. Thornton, “Thermal-structural performance of rigid panel solar arrays,” in Proc. IUTAM-IASS Symp. Deployable Struct., vol. 80, 2000, pp. 163–172, doi: 10.1007/978-94-015-9514-8_18.
  6. H. K. Kim and C. Y. Han, “Analytical and numerical approaches of a solar array thermal analysis in a low-earth orbit satellite,” Adv. Space Res., vol. 46, pp. 1427–1439, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2010.08.023.
  7. P. Li, H. E. Cheng, and W. B. Qin, “Numerical simulation of temperature field in solar arrays of spacecraft in low earth orbit,” Numer. Heat Transf. A, vol. 49, pp. 803–820, 2006, doi: 10.1080/10407780500503904.
  8. W. Li, Z. Xiang, L. Chen, and M. Xue, “Thermal flutter analysis of large-scale space structures based on finite element method,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 69, pp. 887–907, 2007, doi: 10.1002/nme.1793.
  9. M. Murozono and E. A. Thornton, “Buckling and quasistatic thermal-structural response of asymmetric rolled-up solar array,” J. Spacecr. Rockets, vol. 35, pp. 147–155, 1998, doi: 10.2514/2.3322.
  10. O. Song, I. Yoon, and L. Librescu, “Thermally induced bending vibration of composite spacecraft booms subjected to solar heating,” J. Therm. Stresses, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 829–843, 2003, doi: 10.1080/01495730306307.
  11. N. J. Stevens and M. R. Jones, “Environmentally induced discharges on solar arrays in geosynchronous orbit,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 40, pp. 1525–1531, 1993, doi: 10.1109/23.273509.
  12. M. R. Patel, Spacecraft Power Systems. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 2005.
  13. C. W. Chan, C. P. Tso, and F. L. Tan, “Transient heat transfer analysis on a satellite in an orbit,” J. Inst. Eng. Malaysia, vol. 65, no. 3/4, 2004.
  14. M. Bulut and N. Sözbir, “Optimized analytical solution of platform panel radiative area dimensioning of geostationary communications satellites: A practical approach,” Sakarya Univ. J. Sci., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 986–992, 2019, doi: 10.16984/saufenbilder.546894.
  15. M. Bulut and N. Sözbir, “Prediction of the solar array temperatures of geostationary earth orbit satellite by using analytical methods,” in Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Recent Adv. Space Technol. (RAST), 2019.
  16. E. A. Thornton, Thermal Structures for Aerospace Applications. Reston, VA, USA: AIAA, 1996.
  17. H. S. Rauschenbach, Solar Cell Array Design Handbook: The Principles and Technology of Photovoltaic Energy Conversion. New York, NY, USA: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1980.
  18. J. J. Yuan, Design and Analysis of Satellite Structures. Beijing, China: China Astronautic Publishing House, 2004.
  19. J. Li, S. Yan, and R. Chai, “Thermal analysis of composite solar array subjected to space heat flux,” Aerosp. Sci. Technol., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 84–94, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2012.06.010.
  20. A. Okan, N. Sözbir, and M. Bulut, “Reduced thermal mathematical model generation of a Li-ion battery block,” Energies, vol. 18, no. 24, Art. no. 6374, 2025, doi: 10.3390/en18246374.
  21. M. Bulut and N. Sözbir, “A novel approach to estimating dimensions of three-axis stabilized communication satellites with optimal heat transfer,” J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., vol. 148, no. 15, pp. 3575–3584, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10973-023-12174-5.
  22. M. Bulut and N. Sözbir, “Modeling and analysis of battery thermal control in a geostationary satellite,” Sakarya Univ. J. Sci., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 666–676, 2022, doi: 10.16984/saufenbilder.1069404.
  23. C. Atar, M. Aktaş, N. Sözbir, and M. Bulut, “Analytical investigation of surface temperatures for different sized CubeSats at varying low earth orbits,” J. Therm. Sci. Eng. Appl., vol. 15, no. 8, Art. no. 081002, 2023, doi: 10.1115/1.4062401.
  24. M. Bulut and N. Sözbir, “Thermal design, analysis, and test validation of Turksat-3USAT satellite,” J. Therm. Eng., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 468–482, 2021, doi: 10.18186/thermal.887316.
  25. M. Bulut and N. Sözbir, “Analytical investigation of a nanosatellite panel surface temperatures for different altitudes and panel combinations,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 75, pp. 1076–1083, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.10.059.
  26. D. G. Gilmore and R. L. Collins, “Thermal design analysis,” in Satellite Thermal Control Handbook, D. G. Gilmore, Ed. El Segundo, CA, USA: Aerospace Corp., 1994, pp. 5/21–5/39.
  27. I. Muraoka, L. G. Galski, F. L. De Sousa, and F. M. Ramos, “Stochastic spacecraft thermal design optimization with low computational cost,” J. Spacecr. Rockets, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1248–1257, 2006, doi: 10.2514/1.20066.
  28. A. Megahed and A. El-Dib, “Thermal design and analysis for battery module for a remote sensing satellite,” J. Spacecr. Rockets, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 920–926, 2007, doi: 10.2514/1.19355.
  29. ThermXL 4.8 User Guide. ITP Engines UK Ltd., 2009.
  30. R. D. Karam, Satellite Thermal Control for Systems Engineers, vol. 181. Reston, VA, USA: AIAA, 1998.