Journals / Scientific Mining Journal / 2026 / Cilt: 57 Sayı: 2

OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE OF A CONVENTIONAL TWO-COMPARTMENT BALL MILL GRINDING CIRCUIT AT DIFFERENT CEMENT PRODUCTIONS

KONVANSİYONEL İKİ KAMARALI BİLYALI DEĞİRMEN ÖĞÜTME DEVRESİNİN FARKLI ÇİMENTO ÜRETİMLERİNDE İŞLETME PERFORMANSI

Pages
125–133
Publication Date
2018-06-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This figure corresponded to overall energy savings of 7% in ball mill grinding.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of the study is to assess the grinding and classification performance of a conventional Polysius® two-compartment ball mill and a Sepol® dynamic air classifier closed circuit process at Portland CEMI/42.5R and Portland composite CEMII/32.5R cement production types.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Size reduction performance of the ball mill was determined for the sampling cases.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This figure corresponded to overall energy savings of 7% in ball mill grinding.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Öğütme · Bilyalı değirmen · Havalı sınıflandırıcı

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to assess the grinding and classification performance of a conventional Polysius® two-compartment ball mill and a Sepol® dynamic air classifier closed circuit process at Portland CEMI/42.5R and Portland composite CEMII/32.5R cement production types. For this purpose, industrial scale sampling surveys were performed around the circuit. JKSimMet Steady State Mineral Processing Software was used to perform mass balance around the circuits. Size reduction performance of the ball mill was determined for the sampling cases. Classification performance of the dynamic air classifier was evaluated based on the efficiency curve approach. It was determined that, approximately 12% circuit capacity increase could be achieved in composite cement production when ball mill, ball mill filter and air classifier power consumptions were considered. This figure corresponded to overall energy savings of 7% in ball mill grinding.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, konvansiyonel Polysius® iki kamaralı bilyalı değirmen ve Sepol® dinamik

🔖

Cite This Article

Genç, Ö., Benzer, A. (2018). OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE OF A CONVENTIONAL TWO-COMPARTMENT BALL MILL GRINDING CIRCUIT AT DIFFERENT CEMENT PRODUCTIONS. Scientific Mining Journal, Cilt: 57 Sayı: 2, 125–133. https://doi.org/10.30797/madencilik.433928

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Aydoğan N.A., Benzer, A.H., 2011. Comparison of the Overall Circuit Performance in the Cement Industry: High Compression Milling vs. Ball Milling Technology. Minerals Engineering, 24, pp211-215
  2. Benzer, A.H., Ergun, Ş.L., Öner, M., Lynch, A.J., 2001. Simulation of Open Circuit Clinker Grinding. Minerals Engineering, 14 (7), pp701-710.
  3. Dundar, H., Benzer, H, Aydogan, N.A., Altun O., Toprak N.A., Ozcan, O., Eksi, D., Sargın A., 2011. Simulation Assisted Capacity Improvement of Cement Grinding Circuit: Case Study Cement Plant. Minerals Engineering, 24, pp205-210.
  4. Genç, Ö., Benzer, A.H., 2012. Size Reduction Performance Evaluation of Open Circuit Three- Compartment Industrial Scale Cement Grinding Tube Mill. XIIIth International Mineral Processing Symposium, Bodrum, Turkey, pp67-73.
  5. Genç, Ö., Benzer, A.H., 2016. Performance Evaluation of an Industrial Scale Twocompartment Cement Ball Mill and Dynamic Air Classifier Closed Circuit Process at Different Feed Conditions. 15th International Mineral Processing Symposium. Ekim, 19-21, İstanbul, pp187-201.
  6. Genç, Ö., Benzer, A.H., Ergün, Ş.L., 2006. Grinding Performance Evaluation of Two- Compartment Cement Grinding Ball Mills. 11th European Symposium on Comminution. Budapest, Hungary.
  7. Genç, Ö., Benzer, A.H., Ergün, Ş.L., 2008. Effect of High Pressure Grinding Rolls (HPGR®) on Grinding Performance of Two-Compartment Cement Ball Mill. 11th International Mineral Processing Symposium, Antalya, Turkey, pp69-74.
  8. Genç, Ö., Benzer. A.H., 2017. Performance Evaluation of a Conventional Closed Circuit Process at Different Cement Productions. New Trends in Mining, Proceedings of 25th International Mining Congress of Turkey, Antalya, Turkey, pp423.
  9. Hewlett, P.C., 2010. Lea’s Chemistry of Cement and Concrete, Fourth ed. Elsevier Butterworth- Heinemann, ISBN: 978-0-7506-6256-7.
  10. Madlool, N.A., Saidur, R., Hossain, M.S., Rahim, N.A., 2011. A Critical Review on Energy Use and Savings in the Cement Industries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, pp2042- 2060.
  11. Munn, N., Morrell, S., Morrison, R.D., Kojovic T., 2005. Mineral Comminution Circuits Their Operation and Optimization, JKMRC, Brisbane. Norholm, A.,1995. Notes on Energy Conservation, FL Smidth and Co. a/s, Seminar, İstanbul, Turkey.
  12. Polysius Co., 2018, Sepol® High Efficiency Separator. https://www.scribd.com/ d o c u m e n t / 1 0 5 6 7 8 1 6 9 / 1 5 9 2 - S E P O L - g b (accessed 29 May 2018) (Note:digital brochure)
  13. Svarovsky, L., 1984. Hydrocyclones. Holt, Rinehart & Winson Ltd., Eastbourne. Thomas, M., 2007. Optimizing the Use of Fly Ash in Concrete, Portland Cement Association Publication, USA.
  14. United States Geological Survey, 2016. Mineral Commodity Summaries. https://minerals.usgs. gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/gold/mcs-2016- gold.pdf (accessed 2 Sept 2016) (Note: digital report)