Journals / Scientific Mining Journal / 2026 / Cilt: 57 Sayı: 3

ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO PRE-CONCENTRATION OF MURGUL COPPER ORE

MURGUL BAKIR CEVHERİNİN ÖN ZENGİNLEŞTİRMESİNDE ALTERNATİF YAKLAŞIMLAR

Pages
149–162
Publication Date
2018-09-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results indicated that silica removal achieved in high mass and recovery before flotation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, pre-concentration possibilities of Murgul copper ore was investigated by using a laboratory scale teetered bed separator (TBS).
📊
Key Findings & Data:An increase in pressure set point increases gold and sulfur recovery of TBS underflow.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results indicated that silica removal achieved in high mass and recovery before flotation.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kabaran yataklı ayırıcı (KYA) · Altın · Bakır

Abstract

In this study, pre-concentration possibilities of Murgul copper ore was investigated by using a laboratory scale teetered bed separator (TBS). Also effect of operational parameters on different minerals in the ore was evaluated. Results indicated that silica removal achieved in high mass and recovery before flotation. Gold and sulfur recoveries of TBS underflow was similar. An increase in pressure set point increases gold and sulfur recovery of TBS underflow. But an increase in teeter water rate decreases gold and sulfur recovery of TBS underflow. TBS tests were presented significant results about behavior of different density minerals under hindered settling conditions. The TBS underflow product which has highest gold and sulfur recovery was subjected to shaking table test as a pre concentrate. According to test results 11.63% of the shaking table feed can be concentrated with 4.39 ppm gold grade and 64.42% recovery as a final concentrate. The concentrate has also a higher sulfur grade as 48.46%.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Murgul bakır cevherinden laboratuvar ölçekli bir kabaran yataklı ayırıcı (KYA)

🔖

Cite This Article

Özcan, Ö. (2018). ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO PRE-CONCENTRATION OF MURGUL COPPER ORE. Scientific Mining Journal, Cilt: 57 Sayı: 3, 149–162. https://doi.org/10.30797/madencilik.457361

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Erler, A., 1993. Altın ve Türkiye. Metalurji Dergisi 87/27.
  2. Galvin, K. P., Pratten, S. J. Nicol, S. K., 1999. Dense Medium Separation Using A Teetered Bed Separator. Miner. Eng., Vol. 12, no. 9, 1059-1081.
  3. Gül, A., Önal, G., 2000. Pre-Concentration of A Low-Grade Sulfidic Copper Ore From Murgul Çakmakkaya Region of Turkey, Proceedings of the XXI International Mineral Processing Congress, eBook ISBN: 9780080543895, C10-1-C10-4.
  4. Karabalık, N., 1994. Altının Türkiye’deki Yakın Geleceği. JMO Bülteni, Sayı 94/1, Ankara
  5. Kawatra, S. K., Eisele, T. C., 2005. Optimization of Comminution Circuit Throughput and Product Size Distribution by Simulation and Control. Final Technical Report, Department of Chemical Engineering Michigan Technological University, p. 64.
  6. Kumar, C. R., Bhoja, S. K., Tripathy, S. K., Mohanan, S., Venugopalan, T., Suresh N., 2013. Classification Performance Evaluation of Floatex Density Separator For Coal Fines. Fuel, no. 108, 303-310.
  7. Kumar, C. R., Tripathy, S. K., Rao, D. S., 2009. Characterisation and Pre-concentration of Chromite Values from Plant Tailings Using Floatex Density Separator. Journal of Minerals & Materials Characterization & Engineering, Vol. 8, no. 5, 367-378.
  8. Ozcan, O., Ergun, S. L., 2017a. Performance of Teetered Bed Separator For Non-Coal Applications, Separation Science and Technology. Vol. 52:8, 1486-1495.
  9. Ozcan, O., Celik, I.B., 2016. Beneficiation Routes For Upgrading Iron Ore Tailings With A Teetered Bed Separator. Separation Science and Technology, Vol. 51:17, 2844-2855.
  10. Özcan, Ö., 2017. Kabaran Yataklı Ayırıcı ile Farklı Minerallerin Zenginleştirilmesi. Yerbilimleri, Cilt 38 (2), 179-192.
  11. Özcan, Ö., Ergün, Ş. L., 2017b. Yıkama Suyu Miktarının Kabaran Yataklı Ayırıcı Performansı Üzerine Etkisi. IMCET 2017 Bildiri Kitabı, ISBN: 978-605-01-1008-1611-619, Antalya.
  12. Özcan, 2015. Kömür Dışı uygulamalarda Kabaran Yataklı Sınıflandırıcıların Performansının İncelenmesi. Doktora Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara, 168 s.
  13. Richardson, J. F., Zaki, W. N., 1954. Sedimentation and Fluidization: Part I. Transact of Institution of Chemical Engineers, Vol. 32, 35-53.
  14. Sarkar, B., Das, A., Roy S., Kai, K., 2008a. In Depth Analysis of Alumina Removal From Iron Ore Fines Using Teetered Bed Gravity Separator. Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy, 117, no. 1, 48-55.
  15. Sarkar, B., Das, A., Mehrotra, S. P., 2008b. Study of Separation Features in Floatex Density Separator For Cleaning Fine Coal. Int. J. Miner. Process., no. 86, 40-49.
  16. Triphaty, S. K., Mallick M. K., Singh V., Murthy R. M., 2013. Preliminary Studies on Teeter Bed Separator For Separation of Manganese Fines. Powder Technology, no. 239, 284-289.
  17. Ünal, İ.H., Tuncel, S., Yoleri, B., Arslan, M., 2016. Türkiye ve Dünyada Altın. MTA Genel Müdürlüğü, Fizibilite Etütleri Dairesi Başkanlığı, Ankara, s. 35.
  18. Wills, B. A., Napier-Munn, T., 2006. Mineral Processing Technology, An Introduction to the Practical Aspects of Ore Treatment and Mineral, Publisher: Elsevier Science & Technology Books, ISBN: 0750644508.