SavedAdd your journal

Journals / DEPARCH Journal of Design Planning and Aesthetics Research / 2026 / Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1

The Digital Nature of Gothic - Lars Spuybroek & John Ruskin

Mustafa Dallı(ISTANBUL GELISIM UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF FINE ARTS, DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE AND ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN)0000-0002-9743-044X
Asena Soyluk(GAZI UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE, DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURE)0000-0002-6905-4774
Pages
55–64
Publication Date
2022-05-06
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, based on the work of Spuybroek, his work with Nox Architects, the debates on beauty and elegance he encountered in his journey to the nature of Gothic, and why he named gothic architecture digitally were examined and some discussions were made on this subject.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Gothic architecture is a movement that has influenced world architecture, including today’s architecture, since its active period.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although it is known for some of its features such as flying buttresses, pointed arches and vaults, John Ruskin examined the characteristics of Gothic architecture except from its physical features and examined it under 6 main headings.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, based on the work of Spuybroek, his work with Nox Architects, the debates on beauty and elegance he encountered in his journey to the nature of Gothic, and why he named gothic architecture digitally were examined and some discussions were made on this subject.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Aesthetics · Design Theory · Digital Design

Abstract

Gothic architecture is a movement that has influenced world architecture, including today’s architecture, since its active period. Although it is known for some of its features such as flying buttresses, pointed arches and vaults, John Ruskin examined the characteristics of Gothic architecture except from its physical features and examined it under 6 main headings. Lars Spuybroek, the founder of Nox Architects, one of the names that come to mind when talking about digital architecture today, described these characteristics of Ruskin as the “digital nature of Gothic”. He examined 3 of these 6 characteristics and analyzed them in the chapter titled with “The Digital Nature of Gothic” in his book “The Sympathy of Things: Ruskin and the Ecology of Design”. In this study, based on the work of Spuybroek, his work with Nox Architects, the debates on beauty and elegance he encountered in his journey to the nature of Gothic, and why he named gothic architecture digitally were examined and some discussions were made on this subject.

🔖

Cite This Article

Dallı, M., Soyluk, A. (2022). The Digital Nature of Gothic - Lars Spuybroek & John Ruskin. DEPARCH Journal of Design Planning and Aesthetics Research, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 55–64. https://doi.org/10.55755/DepArch.2022.5

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Ludovica Tramontin, M. (2006). Textile Tectonics: An Interview with Lars Spuybroek. Architectural Design, 76(6), 52-59.
  2. Ruskin, J. (1851). The stones of Venice. London: Smith, Elder, and Co.
  3. Spuybroek, L. (2004). NOX: Machining architecture. Thames & Hudson.
  4. Spuybroek, L. (2016). The sympathy of things: Ruskin and the ecology of design. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  5. Spuybroek, Lars (2014). Charis and radiance: The ontological dimensions of beauty. In S. Van Tuinen (Ed.), Giving and taking: antidotes to a culture of greed (pp. 119-49). Rotterdam: V2_Publishing.
  6. Spuybroek, Lars (2016). Sun and Lightning: The Visibility of Radiance. In L. Spuybroek & J. Brouwer (Eds.). The War of Appearances: Transparency, Opacity, Radiance (pp. 98-127). Rotterdam, Netherlands: V2_Publishing.
  7. Spuybroek, Lars (2017). Gothic ontology and sympathy: moving away from the fold. In S. V. Tuinen (Ed.). Speculative art histories. Edinburgh University Press.
  8. Swiatkowski, P. (2014). How to think constructivism? Ruskin, Spuybroek and Deleuze on Gothic architecture. Footprint, 41-52.
  9. URL 1-https://www.designboom.com/architecture/the-three-graces-by-nox-lars-spuybroek/
  10. URL 2- https://tr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dosya:Canova-Three_Graces_0_degree_view.jpg
  11. URL 3- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Turner_-_Fort_Vimieux.jpg
  12. URL 4- https://tr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dosya:Strasbourg_Cathedral_Exterior_-_Diliff.jpg
  13. URL 5– https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1a/Rouen_Cathedral_as_seen_from_Gros_Horloge_140215_4.jpg
  14. URL 6- https://youtu.be/CfAgl4dhuFs?t=1964
  15. URL 7- https://youtu.be/CfAgl4dhuFs?t=2720
  16. URL 8- https://www.michael-hansmeyer.com/projects