SavedAdd your journal

Journals / DEPARCH Journal of Design Planning and Aesthetics Research / 2024 / Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2

Preserving Cultural Heritage with Digital Design and NFT Technologies: Innovative Approaches in Architectural Education

Dijital Tasarım ve NFT Teknolojileriyle Kültürel Mirasın Korunması: Mimarlık Eğitiminde Yenilikçi Yaklaşımlar

Ömer Özeren(KONYA TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-7930-1740
Bahar Sultan Qurraie(KARABÜK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-5142-3367
Mustafa Haki Eraslan(Karabük Üniversitesi)0000-0003-1569-5733
Pages
161–175
Publication Date
2024-11-05
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This research contributes to the ongoing discourse on the role of technology in shaping the future of architecture and preserving cultural heritage.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study explores the integration of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) into architectural education to equip students with the knowledge and skills necessary to thrive in the digital age.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study demonstrated the role of NFTs in fostering networking opportunities, enabling students to connect with a wider audience and potential collaborators.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This research contributes to the ongoing discourse on the role of technology in shaping the future of architecture and preserving cultural heritage.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Mimarlık · Mimarlık Eğitimi · Dijital Tasarım Stüdyosu

Abstract

This study explores the integration of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) into architectural education to equip students with the knowledge and skills necessary to thrive in the digital age. By incorporating NFT technology into the curriculum, the study aimed to foster a comprehensive understanding of digital design, intellectual property protection, and the potential of NFTs in preserving and promoting architectural heritage. The research found integrating NFTs empowered students to explore the intersection of art, technology, and commerce within the architectural realm. By transforming their designs into unique digital assets, students developed a deeper appreciation for their work’s commercial potential and the importance of intellectual property protection. The study demonstrated the role of NFTs in fostering networking opportunities, enabling students to connect with a wider audience and potential collaborators. To fully harness the potential of NFTs in architectural education, the study emphasizes the need for a holistic approach that addresses ethical, legal, and environmental considerations. Educators must instil in students a strong sense of responsibility regarding the creation and utilization of digital assets, including copyright, licensing, and the environmental impact of blockchain technology. Fostering interdisciplinary collaboration is also crucial for equipping students with the diverse skill set required to navigate the complexities of the digital landscape. By addressing these critical dimensions, architectural education can effectively prepare students to become proficient digital designers and informed participants in the evolving NFT ecosystem. This research contributes to the ongoing discourse on the role of technology in shaping the future of architecture and preserving cultural heritage.

Özet

Bu çalışma, öğrencilere dijital çağda başarılı olmak için gerekli bilgi ve becerileri kazandırmak amacıyla, Değiştirilemez Jetonların (NFT’ler) mimarlık eğitimine entegrasyonunu araştırmaktadır. Çalışma, müfredata NFT teknolojisini dahil ederek, dijital tasarım, fikri mülkiyet koruması ve NFT’lerin mimari mirası koruma ve tanıtma potansiyeli hakkında kapsamlı bir anlayış geliştirmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma, NFT’lerin entegre edilmesinin öğrencilere mimarlık alanında sanat, teknoloji ve ticaretin kesişimini keşfetme gücü verdiğini bulmuştur. Öğrenciler, tasarımlarını benzersiz dijital varlıklara dönüştürerek, çalışmalarının ticari potansiyeli ve fikri mülkiyet korumasının önemi konusunda daha derin bir takdir geliştirdiler. Dahası, çalışma, NFT’lerin ağ kurma fırsatlarını teşvik etmedeki rolünü göstererek, öğrencilerin daha geniş bir kitleyle ve potansiyel işbirlikçilerle bağlantı kurmasını sağlamıştır. NFT’lerin mimarlık eğitimindeki potansiyelinden tam olarak yararlanmak için çalışma, etik, yasal ve çevresel hususları ele alan bütünsel bir yaklaşıma olan ihtiyacı vurgulamaktadır. Eğitimciler, öğrencilere telif hakkı, lisanslama ve blok zinciri teknolojisinin çevresel etkisi de dahil olmak üzere dijital varlıkların yaratılması ve kullanımı konusunda güçlü bir sorumluluk duygusu aşılamalıdır. Disiplinler arası iş birliğini teşvik etmek, öğrencilere dijital ortamın karmaşıklıklarında gezinmek için gereken çeşitli beceri setini kazandırmak için de önemlidir. Bu kritik boyutlara değinerek, mimarlık eğitimi öğrencileri yetenekli dijital tasarımcılar ve gelişen NFT ekosisteminde bilgili katılımcılar olmaya etkili bir şekilde hazırlayabilir. Bu araştırma, mimarlığın geleceğini şekillendirmede ve kültürel mirası korumada teknolojinin rolü hakkındaki devam eden söyleme katkıda bulunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özeren, Ö., Qurraie, B. S., Eraslan, M. H. (2024). Preserving Cultural Heritage with Digital Design and NFT Technologies: Innovative Approaches in Architectural Education. DEPARCH Journal of Design Planning and Aesthetics Research, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 161–175. https://doi.org/10.55755/DepArch.2024.32

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (32)

  1. Blokzincir Araştırma Laboratuvarı. (n.d.). Ulusal Blokzincir Çalıştayı. TÜBİTAK BİLGEM UEKAE. Retrieved May 1, 2022, from https://blokzincir.bilgem.tubitak.gov.tr/1-ulusal-blokzincir-calistayi/
  2. Dore, C., & Murphy, M. (2012, September 2-5). Integration of Historic Building Information Modeling (HBIM) and 3D GIS for recording and managing cultural heritage sites [Conference session]. 18th International conference on virtual systems and multimedia (IEEE), Milan, Italy.
  3. Doğan, B., Ersöz, S. Ş., & Şahin, C. (2022). Crypto Art and NFT. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 11(1), 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v10i4.3127
  4. Dursun, N. (2021). NFT/kripto sanat ve hareketli grafik ilişkisi. Sciences, 7(40), 1037-1055. http://dx.doi.org/10.31589/JOSHAS.649
  5. Duru, A. M., & Şenyiğit, Ö. (2023). A study on gathering the opinions of architecture students to enhance user interaction with historical urban fabric: a case study of Tepebağ neighborhood in Adana province. DEPARCH Journal of Design Planning and Aesthetics Research, 2(2), 155-171. https://doi.org/10.55755/DepArch.2023.21
  6. Erol, K. (2021). Venedik mimarlik bienali üzerinden deneysel mimaride bilgisayar destekli tasarim etkilerinin okumasi. Tasarım Enformatiği, 2(2), 65-74. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/te/issue/66501/869947
  7. Fairfield, J. A. T. (2021). Tokenized: The law of non-fungible tokens and unique digital property. Indiana Law Jour-nal, 97(4), 1-54. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol97/iss4/4
  8. Frew, S. (n.d.). NFTs in architecture: how non-fungible tokens are changing design practice. Architizer. Retrieved May 14, 2023, from https://architizer.com/blog/inspiration/industry/nfts-architecture/
  9. Garay, J.A., & Kiayias, A. (2021, May 17-20). A consensus taxonomy in the blockchain era [Conference session]. Cryptographers’ Track at the RSA Conference, San Francisco, USA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40186-3_13
  10. Grover, P., Kar, A. K., & Vigneswara Ilavarasan, P. (2018, October 30-01). Blockchain for businesses: a systematic literature review [Conference session]. 17th IFIP WG 6.11 Conference of Challenges and Opportunities in the Digital Era. Kuwait. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02131-3_29
  11. Milic, R. J., McPherson, P., McConchie, G., Reutlinger, T., & Singh, S. (2022). Architectural history and sustainable architectural heritage education: digitalisation of heritage in New Zealand. Sustainability, 14(24), 16432. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416432
  12. McKnight, K., O’Malley, K., Ruzic, R., Horsley, M. K., Franey, J. J., & Bassett, K. (2016). Teaching in a digital age: How educators use technology to improve student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(3), 194-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.1175856
  13. Murhpy, J. (2023, October 18). Daily digest: Yayoi Kusama and Kiki Smith will design installations for Grand Cen-tral Madison, Kharkiv Art Museum launches NFT collection, and more. The Architect’s Paper. https://www.archpaper.com/2022/10/daily-digest-yayoi-kusama-kiki-smith-grand-central-madison-kharkiv-art-museum-nft-collection-more/
  14. Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Tech. rep., Manubot Press. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3440802
  15. Onur, B. (2022). Concept as the activist of creativity in architectural design: exploring factors affecting concept formation using the structural equation model. Periodica Polytechnica Architecture, 46(1), 121-132. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPar.19143
  16. Onur, B. (2022). Modern trends in the digital age of architectural learning. In A. Çabuk & H.S. Aşıkkutlu (Eds.), New trends in architecture, planning and design (pp. 5-13). Duvar Publications.
  17. Owens, T. (2013). Digital cultural heritage and the crowd. Curator The Museum Journal, 56(1), 121-130. https://doi.org/10.1111/cura.12012
  18. Özeren, E., & Dinç Kalaycı, P. (2022). Mimari tasarım stüdyolarının bibliyometrik veri analizi üzerine bir okuma. In A. Çabuk & H.S. Aşıkkutlu (Eds.), New trends in architecture, planning and design (pp. 113-136). Duvar Publica-tions.
  19. Özeren, E. B., & Qurraıe, B. S. (2024). Sinematik ilhamın grafik, mimarlık ve moda tasarımı eğitimine etkisi: soyut kavramların somut çıktılara dönüşümünde disiplinlerarası yaklaşımlar. Online Journal of Art and Design, 12(4), 1-12. http://adjournal.net/articles/124/1241.pdf
  20. Özeren, Ö., & Sultan Qurraie, B. (2022). Evaluation 0f architectural students’thoughts on transformation and reuse projects using ahp method. In M.T. Kayılı (Ed.), Transformation in architecture (pp. 173-191). Generis Publi-cation.
  21. Saygın, E. P., & Fındıklı, S. (2021). Tuvalden tuşa: Sanat pazarındaki dijital dönüşümde NFT’lerin rolü. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 9(4), 1452-1466. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v9i4.1930
  22. Shirole, M., Darisi, M., & Bhirud, S. (2020). Cryptocurrency token: An overview. In D. Patel, S. Nandi, B. K. Mishra, D. Shah, C. N. Modi, K. Shah & R. S. Bansode (Eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Blockchain Technology (pp. 133–140). Springer.
  23. Sidani, A., Dinis, F. M., Sanhudo, L., Duarte, J., Santos Baptista, J., Pocas Martins, J., & Soeiro, A. (2021). Recent tools and techniques of BIM-based virtual reality: A systematic review. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 28(2), 449-462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-019-09386-0
  24. Stouhi, D. (2021, December 2). Zaha Hadid Architects presents virtual gallery exploring architecture, NFT’s, and the Metaverse, Archdaily. https://www.archdaily.com/972886/zaha-hadid-architects-presents-virtual-gallery-exploring-architecture-nfts-and-the-metaverse
  25. Wang, P., Wu, P., Wang, J., Chi, H. L., & Wang X. (2018). A critical review of the use of virtual reality in construction engineering education and training. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 15(6), 1204. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15061204
  26. Wang, Q., Li, R., Wang, Q., & Chen, S. (2021). Non-fungible token (NFT): Overview, evaluation, opportunities and challenges. ArXiv preprint arXiv:2105.07447. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2105.07447
  27. Wood, G. (2014). Ethereum: A secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger. Ethereum project yellow pa-per,151, 1–32.
  28. Yıldırım, T., Yavuz, A. Ö., & İnan, N. (2010). Mimari tasarım eğitiminde geleneksel ve dijital görselleştirme teknolojilerinin karşılaştırılması. Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 3(3),17-26. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/gazibtd/issue/6620/87945
  29. Yang, X., Grussenmeyer, P., Koehl, M., Macher, H., Murtiyoso, A., & Landes, T. (2020). Review of built heritage modelling: Integration of HBIM and other information techniques. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 46, 350-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2020.05.008
  30. Yetkin, E. G. & Coşkun, K. (2021). Endüstri 5.0 (Toplum 5.0) ve mimarlık. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 27, 347-353. https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.969631
  31. Zağra, H. Ç., Günaydin, D. H. & Özden, S. (2022). Arşiv belgelerindeki mimari çizimlerin dijitalleştirilmesi: Çatalca savunma yapıları örneği. KAPU Trakya Mimarlık ve Tasarım Dergisi, 2(2), 85-104. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kapu/issue/73706/1162894
  32. Xi, W., & Cong, W. (2022). Remote practice methods of survey education for HBIM in the post-pandemic era: case study of Kuiwen Pavilion in the temple of confucius (Qufu, China). Applied Sciences, 12(2), 708. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12020708