Journals / Journal of AI / 2026 / Issue: 10

A Google Earth Engine and Machine Learning Model for Near-Real Time Spatiotemporal Change Detection: Enhancing Vegetation Cover Assessment in Nech Sar National Park, Ethiopia

Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-06-22
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

RF emerged as the most accurate model, with an overall accuracy of 97.81% and a Kappa coefficient of 0.9715, surpassing SVM (79.56%), CART (96.35%), and GTB (94.16%).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Nech Sar National Park (NSNP), a vital biodiversity sanctuary in Ethiopia, is experiencing increasing pressure from human activities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This research employs Google Earth Engine (GEE) and machine learning (ML) techniques to examine vegetation patterns and land cover transformations from 2015 to 2024.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:RF emerged as the most accurate model, with an overall accuracy of 97.81% and a Kappa coefficient of 0.9715, surpassing SVM (79.56%), CART (96.35%), and GTB (94.16%).
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Random Forest · vegetation cover · Nech Sar National Park

Abstract

Nech Sar National Park (NSNP), a vital biodiversity sanctuary in Ethiopia, is experiencing increasing pressure from human activities. This research employs Google Earth Engine (GEE) and machine learning (ML) techniques to examine vegetation patterns and land cover transformations from 2015 to 2024. The study utilized high-resolution Planet NICFI (4.77 m) imagery and evaluated four ML algorithms for land cover classification: Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Classification and Regression Tree (CART), and Gradient Tree Boost (GTB). RF emerged as the most accurate model, with an overall accuracy of 97.81% and a Kappa coefficient of 0.9715, surpassing SVM (79.56%), CART (96.35%), and GTB (94.16%). The findings revealed substantial ecological changes: dense vegetation decreased from 34.2% (2015) to 22.9% (2024), while savanna coverage expanded from 27.9% to 61.1%, primarily due to agricultural expansion and deforestation. Bushland saw a dramatic reduction (19.4% to 0.8%), and grassland fluctuated, reaching a peak of 21.5% in 2019. Bare land remained relatively constant (2–8%). Hotspot analysis identified the eastern part of NSNP as susceptible to land-use alterations. The study introduced an innovative integrated model, combining GEE's cloud computing capabilities with RF, enabling real-time monitoring of land cover dynamics. This framework allows for scalable, high-resolution analysis, providing policymakers with valuable insights for developing adaptive conservation strategies. The research highlights the transformative potential of ML and cloud-based platforms in addressing ecological degradation, offering a replicable approach for protected areas worldwide facing similar challenges.

🔖

Cite This Article

Tessema, G., Asfaw, M. A. (2026). A Google Earth Engine and Machine Learning Model for Near-Real Time Spatiotemporal Change Detection: Enhancing Vegetation Cover Assessment in Nech Sar National Park, Ethiopia. Journal of AI, Issue: 10. https://doi.org/10.61969/jai.1922074

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Alippi, C., Giussani, A., Micheletti, C., Roncoroni, F., Stefini, G., & Vassena, G. (2004). Global positioning and geographical information systems. IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine, 7(4), 36-43. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIM.2004.1383463
  2. Amani, M., Ghorbanian, A., Ahmadi, S. A., Kakooei, M., Moghimi, A., Mirmazloumi, S. M.,. & Brisco, B. (2020). Google earth engine cloud computing platform for remote sensing big data applications: A comprehensive review. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 13, 5326-5350. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2020.3021052
  3. Biau, G., & Scornet, E. (2016). A random forest guided tour. Test, 25(2), 197-227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-016-0481-7
  4. Evans, J. S., Murphy, M. A., Holden, Z. A., & Cushman, S. A. (2010). Modeling species distribution and change using random forest. In Predictive species and habitat modeling in landscape ecology: Concepts and applications (pp. 139-159). New York, NY: Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7390-0_8
  5. Fetene, A., Hilker, T., Yeshitela, K., Prasse, R., Cohen, W., & Yang, Z. (2016). Detecting trends in landuse and landcover change of Nech Sar National Park, Ethiopia. Environmental management, 57(1), 137-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0603-0
  6. Feizizadeh, B., Omarzadeh, D., Kazemi Garajeh, M., Lakes, T., & Blaschke, T. (2023). Machine learning data-driven approaches for land use/cover mapping and trend analysis using Google Earth Engine. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 66(3), 665-697. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2021.2001317
  7. Gaikwad, S. V., Vibhute, A. D., Kale, K. V., Nalawade, D. B., & Jadhav, M. B. (2018, December). Design and development of ground truth collection platform using android and leaflet library. In International Conference on Recent Trends in Image Processing and Pattern Recognition (pp. 520-528). Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9187-3_46
  8. Gonzalez-Pastor, R., Carrera-Pacheco, S. E., Zúñiga-Miranda, J., Rodríguez-Pólit, C., Mayorga-Ramos, A., Guamán, L. P., & Barba-Ostria, C. (2023). Current landscape of methods to evaluate antimicrobial activity of natural extracts. Molecules, 28(3), 1068. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28031068
  9. Habibie, M. I. (2022). The application of machine learning using Google Earth Engine for remote sensing analysis. J. Teknoinfo, 16(2), 233. https://doi.org/10.33365/jti.v16i2.1872
  10. Michel, U. (2004, October). Advanced GPS-based field mapping for collecting training data within a remote sensing classification approach. In Remote Sensing for Environmental Monitoring, GIS Applications, and Geology IV (Vol. 5574, pp. 23-31). SPIE. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.565495
  11. Munjal, R., Arif, S., Wendler, F., & Kanoun, O. (2022). Comparative study of machine-learning frameworks for the elaboration of feed-forward neural networks by varying the complexity of impedimetric datasets synthesized using Eddy current sensors for the characterization of bi-metallic coins. Sensors, 22(4), 1312. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22041312
  12. Pham-Duc, B., Nguyen, H., Phan, H., & Tran-Anh, Q. (2023). Trends and applications of google earth engine in remote sensing and earth science research: a bibliometric analysis using scopus database. Earth Science Informatics, 16(3), 2355-2371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-023-01035-2
  13. Tamiminia, H., Salehi, B., Mahdianpari, M., Quackenbush, L., Adeli, S., & Brisco, B. (2020). Google Earth Engine for geo-big data applications: A meta-analysis and systematic review. ISPRS journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing, 164, 152-170.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.04.001
  14. Team, P. (2017). Planet application program interface: In space for life on Earth. Planet. https://api.planet.com
  15. Velastegui-Montoya, A., Montalván-Burbano, N., Carrión-Mero, P., Rivera-Torres, H., Sadeck, L., & Adami, M. (2023). Google Earth Engine: a global analysis and future trends. Remote Sensing, 15(14), 3675. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15143675
  16. Yang, L., Driscol, J., Sarigai, S., Wu, Q., Chen, H., & Lippitt, C. D. (2022). Google Earth Engine and artificial intelligence (AI): a comprehensive review. Remote Sensing, 14(14), 3253. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14143253
  17. Zhao, Z., Islam, F., Waseem, L. A., Tariq, A., Nawaz, M., Islam, I. U.,. & Hatamleh, W. A. (2024). Comparison of three machine learning algorithms using google earth engine for land use land cover classification. Rangeland ecology & management, 92, 129-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2023.10.007
  18. Amani, M., Ghorbanian, A., Ahmadi, S. A., Kakooei, M., Moghimi, A., Mirmazloumi, S. M.,. & Brisco, B. (2020). Google earth engine cloud computing platform for remote sensing big data applications: A comprehensive review. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 13, 5326-5350. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2020.3021052
  19. Zhao, Z., Islam, F., Waseem, L. A., Tariq, A., Nawaz, M., Islam, I. U.,. & Hatamleh, W. A. (2024). Comparison of three machine learning algorithms using google earth engine for land use land cover classification. Rangeland ecology & management, 92, 129-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2023.10.007