SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Research in Educational Administration and Leadership / 2022 / Volume: 7 Issue: 4

The Impact of the Swedish National Principal Training Programme on Principals’ Leadership and the Structuration Process of School Organisations

Anette Forssten Seiser(Karlstad University)
åsa Söderström(Karlstad University)
Pages
—
Publication Date
2022-12-22
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that leadership needs to be foregrounded throughout the training and that awareness of the function of principals in leading schools’ structuration processes (i.e., their creation of meaning making) should be clarified.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Principals have an important function in schools’ ability to create high-quality learning and teaching.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As the expectations placed on principals are high, large resources are invested in school leadership training, thus necessitating research on the impact of such initiatives.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that leadership needs to be foregrounded throughout the training and that awareness of the function of principals in leading schools’ structuration processes (i.e., their creation of meaning making) should be clarified.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:School leadership training · Principal education · Giddens’s structuration theory

Abstract

Principals have an important function in schools’ ability to create high-quality learning and teaching. As the expectations placed on principals are high, large resources are invested in school leadership training, thus necessitating research on the impact of such initiatives. In this article, we report on a longitudinal research study on the training programme for principals in Sweden. The aim was to examine the programme’s impacts on the principals’ leadership and school organisations. We did this by interviewing principals, teachers and students at four schools during the principals’ participation in the programme. Giddens’s theory of structuration was used to analyse the study. The results showed that leadership needs to be foregrounded throughout the training and that awareness of the function of principals in leading schools’ structuration processes (i.e., their creation of meaning making) should be clarified.

🔖

Cite This Article

Seiser, A. F., Söderström, Å. (2022). The Impact of the Swedish National Principal Training Programme on Principals’ Leadership and the Structuration Process of School Organisations. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, Volume: 7 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.30828/real.1120909

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (30)

  1. Blossing, U. (Ed.). (2011). Skolledarens i fokus – kunskap, värden och verktyg [Principal in focus: Knowledge, values and tools]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  2. Clarke, S. & Dempster, N. (2020). Leadership learning: The pessimism of context and the optimism of personal agency. Professional Development in Education, 46(4), 711–727. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1787196
  3. Darling-Hammond, L., LaPoint, M., & Meyerson, D. (2007). Preparing school leaders for a changing world: Lessons from exemplary leadership development programs. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
  4. Dempster, N., Lovette, S., & Fluckinger, B. (2011). Strategies to develop school leaders: A select literature review. The Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). Melbourne.
  5. Ekholm, M. (1981). Deltagarbedömningar av skolledarutbildningens utfall. En jämförelse mellan två enkätundersökningar [Participant assessments of the outcomes of school leadership training: A comparison between two surveys]. Skolledarutbildningen. Linköping.
  6. Forssten Seiser, A., & Söderström, Å. (2021). Rektorer i utbildning – drivkrafter för ett lärande i samspel [Principals in education: Driving forces for interactive in learning]. Högre Utbildning, 11(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.23865/hu.v11.2947
  7. Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. Red Globe Press. London.
  8. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Polity Press, Cambridge
  9. Giddens, A., & Pierson, C. (1998). Conversations with Anthony Giddens: Making sense of modernity. Polity Press, Cambridge
  10. Grissom, J., Egalite, A., & Lindsay, C. (2021). How principals affect students and schools: A systematic synthesis of two decades of research. The Wallace Foundation. https://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/Documents/How-Principals-Affect-Students-and-Schools.pdf
  11. Grootenboer, P., & Hardy I. (2015). Contextualizing, orchestrating and learning for leading: The praxis and particularity of educational leadership practices. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(3) 402–418. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1741143215595418
  12. Hallinger, P. (2018). Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1741143216670652
  13. Henry, G., & Harbatkin, E. (2019). Turnover at the top: Estimating the effects of principal turnover on student, teacher and school outcomes. Annenberg Institute at Brown University. EdWorking Paper No. 19–95. https://www.edworkingpapers.com/sites/default/files/ai19-95.pdf
  14. Huber, S. G. (2013). Multiple learning approaches in the professional development of school leaders: Theoretical perspectives and empirical findings on self-assessment and feedback. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(4): 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1741143213485469
  15. Hultman, G. (1981). Organisationsutveckling genom ledarutbildning. En utvärdering av skolledarutbildningens första utbildningsomgång [Organisational development through leadership training: An evaluation of the school leader’s first round of education]. Linköpings university Department of Education. Linköping.
  16. Jensen, R. (2016). School leadership development: What we know and how we know it. Acta Didactica Norge, 10(4), 48–68. https://doi.org/10.5617/adno.3898
  17. Jerdborg, S. (2021). Participation in the Swedish national principal training programme: How does it intertwine with principals’ practice? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143221998711
  18. Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(5), 671–706. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430701800060
  19. Leithwood, K., & Louise, K. S. (2012). Linking leadership to learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  20. Leithwood, K., & Steinbach, R. (1992). Improving the problem-solving expertise of school administrators: Theory and practice. Education and Urban Society, 24(3): 317–345. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0013124592024003003
  21. McCulla, N., & Degenhardt, L. (2016). Journeys to school leadership: How action learning identified what participants valued in a year-long Australian leadership development program centred on principals of good practice. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(4): 558–577. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1741143214558574
  22. Pettigrew, A., Schmuck, R., & Vormeland, O. (1982). International views on the Swedish school leader education. Skolledarutbildningens utvärderingsserie. Linköping.
  23. Pont, B., Nusche, D., & Moorman, H. (2008). Improving school leadership. Volume 1: Policy and Practice. OECD. Paris.
  24. Robinson, V. (2011). Student-centred leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  25. Robinson, V., Hohepa, M., & Lloyd, C. (2009). School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why. Best evidence synthesis iteration. New Zealand Ministry of Education. Wellington.
  26. Robinson, V., Lloyd, C., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of educational leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0013161X08321509
  27. Skolverket. (2015). The national school leadership training programme: Goal document 2015–2021. Skolverket. Stockholm.
  28. Thelin, K. (2020). Principal turnover: When is it a problem and for whom? Mapping out variations within the Swedish case.
  29. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, 5(2), 417–452. https://doi.org/10.30828/real/2020.2.4
  30. Yin, R. K. (2013). Kvalitativ forskning från start till mål [Qualitative research from start to finish]. Studentlitteratur. Lund.