SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Research in Educational Administration and Leadership / 2024 / Volume: 9 Issue: 4

The Adaptation and Psychometric Analysis of the Global Transformational Leadership (GTL) Scale for Turkish Educational Institutions

Cihat Turan(FIRAT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)
Zülfü Demirtaş(FIRAT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-1072-5772
Müslim Alanoğlu(FIRAT ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0003-1828-4593
Pages
—
Publication Date
2024-12-23
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicated that the adapted GTL scale is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring transformational leadership in Turkish educational institutions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Effective leadership is essential in transforming schools into vibrant learning environments that foster teachers' professional growth and boost student achievement.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Among various leadership styles, transformational leadership, with its emphasis on vision, support, and innovation, stands out due to its potential to maximize performance and foster school success.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicated that the adapted GTL scale is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring transformational leadership in Turkish educational institutions.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Transformational Leadership · Scale Adaptation · Educational Institutions

Abstract

Effective leadership is essential in transforming schools into vibrant learning environments that foster teachers' professional growth and boost student achievement. Among various leadership styles, transformational leadership, with its emphasis on vision, support, and innovation, stands out due to its potential to maximize performance and foster school success. The objective of this research is to translate and culturally adapt the Global Transformational Leadership Scale (GTL) by Carless et al. (2000) into Turkish, with a focus on its application in educational institutions. The adaptation process followed a rigorous methodology to ensure the scale's semantic and conceptual equivalence in Turkish culture. This process involved translation, back-translation, and revisions based on expert feedback. The research was conducted with a sample of 322 teachers from a mid-sized city in eastern Türkiye, and data collection took place in three phases: linguistic equivalence testing with English teachers, parallel testing with the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire and other relevant scales, and test-retest reliability analysis. CFA was performed to verify the scale's factor structure, and various validity and reliability measures were assessed, including convergent validity, nomological validity, and measurement invariance across gender, education level, and tenure. The results indicated that the adapted GTL scale is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring transformational leadership in Turkish educational institutions.

🔖

Cite This Article

Turan, C., Demirtaş, Z., Alanoğlu, M. (2024). The Adaptation and Psychometric Analysis of the Global Transformational Leadership (GTL) Scale for Turkish Educational Institutions. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, Volume: 9 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.30828/real.1518967

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (83)

  1. Abuhassira, H. Y., Razak, A. Z. A., & Hoque, K. E. (2024). The impact of transformational leadership on classroom interaction in UAE secondary schools. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12701-3
  2. Al-Aamri, M. S. H., Soliman, M., & Ponniah, L. S. (2024). Influencers of academic staff performance in higher education: The role of motivation, transformational leadership, and involvement in strategic planning. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-08-2023-0339
  3. Alanoglu, M. (2023). Creating learning schools through learning-centered leadership: Understanding the moderating role of teacher performance. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 0(0), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432231188641
  4. Alzoraiki, M., Ahmad, A., Ateeq, A., Naji, G., AlMaamari, Q., & Beshr, B. (2023). Impact of Teachers’ Commitment to the Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Sustainable Teaching Performance. Sustainability, 15(5), 4620. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054620
  5. Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (1995). Individual consideration viewed at multiple levels of analysis: A multi-level framework for examining the diffusion of transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 199-218.
  6. Aydın, A., Sarıer, Y., & Uysal, Ş. (2013). The effect of school principals' leadership styles on teachers' organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 13(2), 806–811.
  7. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press.
  8. Bass, B. M. (1997). Does the transactional–transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries? American Psychologist, 52(2), 130-139.
  9. Berger, R., Romeo, M., Guardia, J., Yepes, M. & Soria, M. A. (2012). Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Human System Audit Short-Scale of Transformational Leadership, The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15(1), 367-376.
  10. Berkovich, I., & Hassan, T. (2023). Principals’ digital transformational leadership, teachers’ commitment, and school effectiveness. Education Inquiry, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2023.2173705
  11. Boberg, J., & Bourgeois, S. (2016). The effects of integrated transformational leadership on achievement. Journal of Educational Administration, 54, 357-374. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-07-2014-0086
  12. Brannan, J. D., White, A., & Long, J. (2016). Learning styles: Impact on knowledge and confidence in nursing students in simulation and classroom. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 13, 63-73.
  13. Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216.
  14. Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595-616.
  15. Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthén, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 456–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.456
  16. Carless, S. A., Wearing, A. J., & Mann, L. (2000). A short measure of transformational leadership. Journal of Business and Psychology, 14, 389-405.
  17. Charoensukmongkol, P., & Puyod, J. V. (2021). Influence of transformational leadership on role ambiguity and work–life balance of Filipino University employees during COVID-19: Does employee involvement matter?. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 27(2), 429–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.1882701
  18. Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
  19. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
  20. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Choi, S., Yusof, W. M. W., Tan, O., & Low, H. H. (2014). The impact of transformational leadership style on job satisfaction. World Applied Sciences Journal, 29(1), 117-124.
  21. Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). Charismatic leadership in organizations. Sage Publications.
  22. Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1994). Charismatic leadership in organizations: Perceived behavioral attributes and their measurement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 439-452.
  23. Dahlgaard-Park, S. (2015). Transformational leadership. In The SAGE encyclopedia of quality and the service economy (Vol. 2, pp. 820-823). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483346366
  24. Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52, 221-258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15616863
  25. Demirbilek, M., & Çetin, M. (2021). School principals' sustainable management behaviors. International Journal of Management and Administration, 5(10), 1-36.
  26. Demirtaş, Z. (2010). Teachers’ job satisfaction levels. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1069-1073.
  27. Demirtaş, Z., & Alanoglu, M. (2015). The relationship between teachers' participation in decision-making and job satisfaction. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(2), 83-100.
  28. Eyal, O., & Roth, G. (2011). Principals' leadership and teachers' motivation: Self-determination theory analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(3), 256-275.
  29. Fernet, C., Trépanier, S. G., Austin, S., Gagné, M., & Forest, J. (2015). Transformational leadership and optimal functioning at work: On the mediating role of employees’ perceived job characteristics and motivation. Work & Stress, 29(1), 11–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2014.1003998
  30. Fleming, C. M., Calvert, H. G., & Turner, L. (2023). Burnout among school staff: A longitudinal analysis of leadership, connectedness, and psychological safety. School Mental Health, 15(3), 900-912.
  31. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  32. Gadbow, N. F. (2001). Teaching strategies that help learners with different needs. Adult Learning, 12(2), 19-21.
  33. García-Martínez, I., Arrifano Tadeu, P. J., Pérez-Ferra, M., & Ubago-Jiménez, J. L. (2020). Building a common project by promoting pedagogical coordination and educational leadership for school improvement: A structural equation model. Social Sciences, 9(4), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9040052
  34. Geisinger, K. F. (1994). Cross-cultural normative assessment: Translation and adaptation issues influencing the normative interpretation of assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 304-312.
  35. Gravesande, J., Richardson, J., Griffith, L., & Scott, F. (2019). Test-retest reliability, internal consistency, construct validity and factor structure of a falls risk perception questionnaire in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A prospective cohort study. Archives of Physiotherapy, 9, 1-11.
  36. Gumus, S., Bellibas, M. S., Esen, M., & Gumus, E. (2018). A systematic review of studies on leadership models in educational research from 1980 to 2014. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(1), 25-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216659296
  37. Hallinger, P., & Hosseingholizadeh, R. (2020). Exploring instructional leadership in Iran: A mixed methods study of high- and low-performing principals. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(4), 595-616. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143219836684
  38. Hambleton, R. K. & Patsula, L. (1999). Increasing the validity of adapted tests: Myths to be avoided and guidelines for improving test adaptation practices. Journal of Applied Testing Technology. 1(1), 1-30.
  39. Hanaysha, J., Khalid, K., Mat, N., Sarassina, F., Yahya Bin Ab Rahman, M., & Zakaria, A. (2012). Transformational Leadership and Job Satisfaction. American Journal of Economics, 2(6), 145-148.
  40. Hayes, A. F., & Coutts, J. J. (2020). Use omega rather than Cronbach’s alpha for estimating reliability. But…. Communication Methods and Measures, 14(1), 1-24.
  41. Ho, C.L. ve Au, W.T. (2006). Teaching satisfaction scale: Measuring job satisfaction of teachers. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 172-185.
  42. Hu, L.-t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  43. International Test Commission. (2017). The ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (Second edition). [www.InTestCom.org].
  44. Iqbal, S., Taib, C. A. B., & Razalli, M. R. (2023). The nexus between leadership styles and organizational performance: the mediating role of quality culture. Quality Assurance in Education, 31(4), 600-615.
  45. Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
  46. Korkmaz, M. (2005). Duyguların ve liderlik stillerinin öğretmenlerin performansı üzerinde etkisi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 43(43), 401-422.
  47. Kouzes, J., & Posner, B. (1990). Leadership Practices Inventory (LPI): A self-assessment and analysis. San Diego Pfeiffer & Co.
  48. Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2002). The leadership challenge (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
  49. Kumar, P., Kumar, A., & Smart, K. (2004). Assessing the impact of instructional methods and information technology on student learning styles. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 1, 533-544.
  50. Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership & Management, 28(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430701800060
  51. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2000). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational conditions and student engagement with school. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 112-129.
  52. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: Effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 201-227.
  53. Leithwood, K., & Sun, J. (2012). The nature and effects of transformational school leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48, 387-423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11436268
  54. Male, T., & Palaiologou, I. (2012). Learning-centred leadership or pedagogical leadership? An alternative approach to leadership in education contexts. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 15, 107-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2011.617839
  55. Marks, H. M., & Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370-397.
  56. McDonald, R. P. (2013). Test theory: A unified treatment. Psychology Press.
  57. Meade, A. W., Johnson, E. C., & Braddy, P. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 568.
  58. Millsap, R. E. (2011). Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. Routledge.
  59. Millsap, R. E., & Cham, H. (2013). Investigating factorial invariance in longitudinal data. In B. Laursen, T. D. Little, & N. A. Card (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 109-148). Guilford Press.
  60. Moolenaar, N. M., Daly, A. J., & Sleegers, P. J. C. (2010). Occupying the principal position: Examining relationships between transformational leadership, social network position, and schools' innovative climate. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(5), 623-670.
  61. Munir, R. I. S., Rahman, R., Malik, A., & Ma’amor, H. (2012). Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Employees’ Job Satisfaction among the Academic Staff. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65, 885-890.
  62. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. Nedelcu, A. (2013). Transformational approach to school leadership: Contribution to continued improvement of education. Manager Journal, 17, 237-244.
  63. Nuckles, C. R. (2000). Student-centered teaching: Making it work. Adult Learning, 11(4), 5-6.
  64. Okan, N., & Okan, Y. T. (2021). Adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the short transformational leadership scale in Turkish. Turkish Studies - Social, 16(2), 687-700. https://dx.doi.org/10.47356/TurkishStudies.48329
  65. Özdemir, S., Sezgin, F., Kılınç, A. Ç., Erdoğan, O., & Turan Bora, H. (2024). Unveiling the associations between principal self-efficacy, openness to change and transformational leadership: the mediating role of well-being. Journal of Educational Administration. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-11-2023-0284
  66. Piccolo, R., & Colquitt, J. (2006). Transformational leadership and job behaviors: The mediating role of core job characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 327-340. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2006.20786079
  67. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 1, 107-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7
  68. Ratna, R., Ligori, A. A. L., Rasaily, B. B., Lhamo, U., Zangmo, S., Tshering, T., & Gyeltshen, S. (2022). Impact of teacher’s leadership style on student’s academic performance: A case of business school. Bhutan Journal of Research and Development, 11(1), 71-91. https://doi.org/10.17102/bjrd.rub.11.1.027
  69. Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635-674.
  70. Schmitt, N., & Kuljanin, G. (2008). Measurement invariance: Review of practice and implications. Human Resource Management Review, 18(4), 210–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.03.003
  71. Schmitz, M. L., Antonietti, C., Consoli, T., Cattaneo, A., Gonon, P., & Petko, D. (2023). Transformational leadership for technology integration in schools: Empowering teachers to use technology in a more demanding way. Computers & Education, 204, 104880.
  72. Seçer, G. (2015). The process of developing and adapting psychological tests. Ankara: Anı Publishing. Somech, A. (2005). Directive versus participative leadership: Two complementary approaches to managing school effectiveness. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41, 777-800. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X05279448
  73. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.
  74. Taş, A., & Çetiner, A. (2011). Teachers' opinions on the extent to which secondary school principals exhibit transformational leadership behaviors. Turkish Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(2), 369–392.
  75. Tesfaw, T. (2014). The relationship between transformational leadership and job satisfaction. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(6), 903-918.
  76. Thomas, L., Tuytens, M., Devos, G., Kelchtermans, G., & Vanderlinde, R. (2020). Transformational school leadership as a key factor for teachers’ job attitudes during their first year in the profession. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(1), 106-132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143218781064
  77. Tran, H., Dou, J., Ylimaki, R., & Brunderman, L. (2022). How do distributed and transformational leadership teams improve working conditions and student learning in underperforming high-needs schools?. European Journal of Educational Management, 5(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.12973/eujem.5.1.1
  78. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Gareis, C. R. (2015). Principals, trust, and cultivating vibrant schools. Societies, 5(2), 256-276.
  79. Xu, H., & Tracey, T. J. (2017). Use of multi-group confirmatory factor analysis in examining measurement invariance in counseling psychology research. The European Journal of Counselling Psychology, 6(1), 75-82.
  80. Van Beveren, P., Dimas, I. D., Lourenço, P. R., & Rebelo, T. (2017). Psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the Global Transformational Leadership (GTL) scale. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 33(2), 109-114.
  81. Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Sage Publications, Inc.
  82. Yıldız, I., & Şimşek, Ö. F. (2016). Different Pathways from Transformational Leadership to Job Satisfaction: The Competing Mediator Roles of Trust and Self-Efficacy. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 27(1), 59-77.
  83. Zhang, J., Huang, Q., & Xu, J. (2022). The relationships among transformational leadership, professional learning communities and teachers’ job satisfaction in China: What do the principals think? Sustainability, 14(4), 2362. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042362