SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Research in Educational Administration and Leadership / 2026 / Volume: 10 Issue: 1

The Influence of the National Culture on the Association Between School Leadership and Teacher Commitment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abdullah Selvitopu(Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi)0000-0001-7045-468X
Metin Kaya(İSTANBUL MEDİPOL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-8287-4929
A. Taylan Aydın(ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0009-0008-9681-0791
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-03-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We discussed the research findings and proposed recommendations for future research.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study was an attempt to examine the influence of national culture on the association between school leadership and teacher commitment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We systematically reviewed the literature on school leadership and teacher commitment, then followed a meta-analytic process by combining the data from the included studies and finally conducted meta-regression procedures to identify the main cultural predictors of the association between the two variables using Hofstede's (2011) theoretical model of cultural dimensions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We discussed the research findings and proposed recommendations for future research.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:National culture · school leadership · teacher commitment

Abstract

The present study was an attempt to examine the influence of national culture on the association between school leadership and teacher commitment. We systematically reviewed the literature on school leadership and teacher commitment, then followed a meta-analytic process by combining the data from the included studies and finally conducted meta-regression procedures to identify the main cultural predictors of the association between the two variables using Hofstede's (2011) theoretical model of cultural dimensions. Our findings suggest that there is a moderate positive relationship between school leadership and teacher commitment, that certain leadership styles are important in this relationship, and that power distance and individualism have negative influences on this association. Masculinity, uncertainty avoidance, long-term orientation and indulgence dimensions do not influence the association between school leadership and teacher commitment. We discussed the research findings and proposed recommendations for future research.

🔖

Cite This Article

Selvitopu, A., Kaya, M., Aydın, A. T. (2025). The Influence of the National Culture on the Association Between School Leadership and Teacher Commitment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, Volume: 10 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.30828/real.1586079

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (63)

  1. Abd Razak, N., Darmawan, I. G. N., & Keeves, J. P. (2010). The influence of culture on teacher commitment. Social Psychology of Education, 13, 185-205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-009-9109-z
  2. Afonso, J., Ramirez-Campillo, R., Clemente, F. M., Büttner, F. C., & Andrade, R. (2024). The perils of misinterpreting and misusing “publication Bias” in meta-analyses: An education review on funnel plot-based methods. Sports Medicine, 54(2), 257-269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-023-01927-9
  3. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). Organizational socialization tactics: A longitudinal analysis of links to newcomers' commitment and role orientation. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 847-858. https://doi.org/10.5465/256294
  4. Avolio, B. J. (1999). Full leadership development: Building the vital forces in organizations. Sage.
  5. Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001
  6. Avolio, B. J., Zhu, W., Koh, W., & Bhatia, P. (2004). Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: Mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 25(8), 951-968.
  7. Aydın, A., Sarıer, Y., & Uysal, Ş. (2013). The effect of school principals’ leadership styles on teachers’ organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice,13(2), 795-811. Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership. Psychology press.
  8. Beatriz, P., Deborah, N., & Hunter, M. (2008). Improving school leadership, Policy and practice (Vol. 1). OECD publishing.
  9. Bellibaş, M. Ş., Gümüş, S., & Chen, J. (2023). The impact of distributed leadership on teacher commitment: The mediation role of teacher workload stress and teacher well‐being. British Educational Research Journal, 50(2), 814-836. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3944
  10. Bellibaş, M. Ş., Polatcan, M., & Akyürek, M. İ. (2022). Principal leadership typologies and their relationship with teacher self-efficacy and commitment: A latent profile mediation analysis. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221139932
  11. Beugelsdijk, S., & Welzel, C. (2018). Dimensions and dynamics of national culture: Synthesizing Hofstede with Inglehart. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49(10), 1469-1505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022118798505 Berkovich, I., & Bogler, R. (2021). Conceptualising the mediating paths linking effective school leadership to teachers’ organisational commitment. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(3), 410-429. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220907321
  12. Biamba, C., & Odero, J. (2016). A policy review of school leadership in Sub-Saharan Africa. In Symposium on Education Policies “Leading better learning: School leadership and quality in the Education 2030 Agenda”–Regional reviews of policies and practices on school leadership, UNESCO, Paris.
  13. Bissessar, C. (2018). An application of Hofstede’s cultural dimension among female educational leaders. Education sciences, 8(2), 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8020077
  14. Blair, M. (2002). Effective school leadership: The multi-ethnic context. British journal of sociology of education, 23(2), 179-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690220137701
  15. Borenstein, M. & Hedges, L. V. (2019). Effect sizes for meta-analysis in Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (Ed). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis, (pp.207-242). Russell Sage Foundation.
  16. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2021). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
  17. Burns, J. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row Publishers Inc.
  18. Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2014). School leadership models: What do we know?. School Leadership & Management, 34(5), 553-571. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2014.928680
  19. Cicolini, G., Comparcini, D., & Simonetti, V. (2013). Workplace empowerment and nurses' job satisfaction: a systematic literature review. Journal of nursing management, 22(7), 855-871. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12028
  20. Chen, L. T., Chen, C. W., & Chen, C. Y. (2010). Are educational background and gender moderator variables for leadership, satisfaction and organizational commitment? African Journal of Business Management, 4(2), 248.
  21. Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56(2), 455-463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
  22. Firestone, W. A., & Rosenblum, S. (1988). Building commitment in urban high schools. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 10(4), 285-299. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737010004285
  23. Firestone, W. A., & Pennell, J. R. (1993). Teacher commitment, working conditions, and differential incentive policies. Review of educational research, 63(4), 489-525. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543063004489
  24. Gough, D., Stewart, R., & Tripney, J. (2017). Using research findings. An introduction to systematic reviews, 2nd ed., London: Sage Publications Ltd, 279-296.
  25. Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764032000122005
  26. Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
  27. Hofstede, G. (2010). The GLOBE debate: Back to relevance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 1339-1346.
  28. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage Publications.
  29. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture and organizations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 10(4), 15-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.1980.11656300
  30. Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Van Keer, H. (2011). The relation between school leadership from a distributed perspective and teachers’ organizational commitment: Examining the source of the leadership function. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(5), 728-771. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11402065
  31. Jackson, T. A., Meyer, J. P., & Wang, X. H. (2013). Leadership, commitment, and culture: A meta-analysis. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 20(1), 84-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051812466919 Jiang, Z. (2015). Cultural values, organizational trust, and organizational commitment. In Academy of Management Proceedings, (1), 16089. Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.
  32. Jin, Z. C., Zhou, X. H., & He, J. (2015). Statistical methods for dealing with publication bias in meta‐analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 34(2), 343-360. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6342
  33. Kirkman, B. L., Lowe, K. B., & Gibson, C. B. (2006). A quarter century of culture's consequences: A review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede's cultural values framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 285-320. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400202 Lee, J. C. K., Zhang, Z., & Yin, H. (2011). A multilevel analysis of the impact of a professional learning community, faculty trust in colleagues and collective efficacy on teacher commitment to students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 820-830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.01.006
  34. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: Effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 201-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450600565829
  35. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2005). A review of transformational school leadership research 1996–2005. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 177-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760500244769
  36. Leithwood, K., Sun, J., & Schumacker, R. (2020). How school leadership influences student learning: A test of “The four paths model”. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(4), 570-599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X19878772
  37. Leithwood, K., & Sun, J. (2012). The nature and effects of transformational school leadership: A meta-analytic review of unpublished research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(3), 387-423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11436268
  38. Li, Y., & Karanxha, Z. (2024). Literature review of transformational school leadership: models and effects on student achievement (2006–2019). Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 52(1), 52-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221077157
  39. Li, L., Zhu, H., & Li, H. (2022). School leadership enhances secondary students’ achievement in rural China through teacher commitment and collaborative culture. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 894688. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.894688
  40. Liu, Y., & Watson, S. (2023). Whose leadership role is more substantial for teacher professional collaboration, job satisfaction and organizational commitment: a lens of distributed leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 26(6), 1082-1110. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2020.1820580
  41. Liu, Y., & Werblow, J. (2019). The operation of distributed leadership and the relationship with organizational commitment and job satisfaction of principals and teachers: A multi-level model and meta-analysis using the 2013 TALIS data. International Journal of Educational Research, 96, 41-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.05.005 Masry-Herzallah, A., & Da'as, R. A. (2021). Cultural values, school innovative climate and organizational affective commitment: a study of Israeli teachers. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(2), 496-512. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-06-2020-0302
  42. McShane, B. B., Böckenholt, U., & Hansen, K. T. (2016). Adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis: An evaluation of selection methods and some cautionary notes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(5), 730-749. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616662243
  43. Mendonca, M., & Kanungo, R. (2006). Ethical leadership. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
  44. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Sage Publications.
  45. Miller, P. (2018). ‘Culture’ ‘context’, school leadership and entrepreneurialism: Evidence from sixteen countries. Education Sciences, 8(2),76. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8020076
  46. Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14(2), 224-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(79)90072-1
  47. Nguni, S., Sleegers, P., & Denessen, E. (2006). Transformational and transactional leadership effects on teachers' job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and organizational citizenship behavior in primary schools: The Tanzanian case. School Effectiveness And School Improvement, 17(2), 145-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450600565746
  48. OECD (2013), Leadership for 21st century learning, Educational Research and Innovation. OECD Publishing. O’Brien, J., & D. Murphy. 2016. “Leadership, School Leadership and Headship.” In School Leadership, edited by J. O’Brien, 1–29. Edinburgh: Dunedin Academic Press.
  49. O'Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 492. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.492
  50. Özdemir, N., Gümüş, S., Kılınç, A. Ç., & Bellibaş, M. Ş. (2024). A systematic review of research on the relationship between school leadership and student achievement: An updated framework and future direction. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 52(5), 1020-1046. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221118662
  51. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. International Journal of Surgery, 88, 105906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906
  52. Pashiardis, P., & Johansson, O. (2021). Successful and effective schools: Bridging the gap. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(5), 690-707. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220932585 Patterson, K. A. (2003). Servant leadership: A theoretical model. Regent University.
  53. Paul, J., & Barari, M. (2022). Meta‐analysis and traditional systematic literature reviews—What, why, when, where, and how?. Psychology & Marketing, 39(6), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21657
  54. Pont, B., Moorman, H., & Nusche, D. (2008). Improving school leadership (1), 578. Paris: OECD.
  55. Qadach, M., Schechter, C., & Da’as, R. A. (2020). Instructional leadership and teachers' intent to leave: The mediating role of collective teacher efficacy and shared vision. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(4), 617-634. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143219836683
  56. Rusliza, Y., & Fawzy, E. (2016). Leadership styles and organizational commitment: literature review. Journal of Management Development, 35(2), 190-216. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-01-2015-0004
  57. Selvitopu, A., & Kaya, M. (2017). Leadership and organizational commitment in educational institutions context: A meta-analytic review. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (31), 719-728. https://doi.org/10.14582/DUZGEF.1822
  58. Şen, S. & Yıldırım, İ. (2020). Meta-analysis applications with CMA. Anı Publishing.
  59. Waters, T. J., & Marzano, R. J. (2006). School district leadership that works: The effect of superintendent leadership on student achievement. A working paper. Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning (McREL).
  60. Wiener, Y. (1982). Commitment in organizations: A normative view. Academy of Management Review, 7(3), 418-428. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1982.4285349
  61. Wu, M. (2006). Hofstede's cultural dimensions 30 years later: A study of Taiwan and the United States. Intercultural Communication Studies, 15(1), 33.
  62. Zadok, A., & Benoliel, P. (2023). Middle-leaders' transformational leadership: big five traits and teacher commitment. International Journal of Educational Management, 37(4), 810-829. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-12-2022-0541
  63. Zhang, Y. (2015). Sustaining Lesson Study in schools with positive peer leadership: A case study in Hong Kong. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 4(2), 140-154. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-07-2014-0018