Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2

Dönüşlü adıllar ve eylem etkileşimi: deneysel bir inceleme

Pages
0–0
Publication Date
2007-12-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
🔖

Cite This Article

YARAR, E. (2007). Dönüşlü adıllar ve eylem etkileşimi: deneysel bir inceleme. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2, 0–0. https://ajindex.com/articles/16336

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Almor, A. (2000). Constraints and mechanisms in theories of anaphor processing. Architecturesand mechanisms for language processing. M. Pickering, C. Clifton, ve M. Crocker (Haz.).Cambridge University Press.
  2. Alsina, A. (2002). The Chimwi:ni reflexive puzzle: filling a gap in the typology of complexpredicates. Mismatch: Form-Junction incongruity and the architecture of grammar. E.Francis ve L. Michaelis (Haz.), CSLI Publications. Asudeh, Â. ve F. Keller. (2001). Experimental evidence for a predication-based binding theory.Papers from the 37th meeting of the Chicago linguistic society, Cilt 1: The main session,1-14,
  3. Chicago. Azzam, S. (1996). Resolving anaphors in embedded sentences, www.portal.acm.org [2/12/2005]
  4. Cole, P. G. Hermon,, Y. Tjung, C. Y. Sim ve C. Kim. (2004). Are all anaphors subject to the binding theory? SWL (Syntax of the World's Languages) 1 'de sunulan bildiri. Cançado, M. ve C. Franchi. (1999). Exceptional binding with psych verbs? Linguistic Inquiry 30 (1), 133-143.
  5. Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris Publication. Frank, R. Y.-S. Lee ve O. Rambow. (1995). Scrambling, reconstruction and subject binding.www.cog.jhu.edu/faculty/frank/papers/rivista.scrambling.pdf [22/4/2006]
  6. Henadeerage, K. (1998). Anaphoric binding in colloquial sinhala. Proceedings of the LFG 98 conference. M. Butt ve T. Halloway King (Haz.), CSLI Publications. Joo, Y. S. (1995). Argument structure, prominence relations, and reflexivity in Korean and English. Studies in generative grammar 5, Sayı: 2, 507-530. The Korean Generative Grammar Circle. Kornfilt, J. (2001). Local and long-distance reflexives in Turkish. Syntax and semantics, 33, 197-226,
  7. Academic Press.
  8. Kornfilt, J. ve E. Yarar. (2006). Kendi ve Kendisi dönüşlü adıllarının deneysel bir incelemesi. XX. Dilbilim Kurultayı'nda (Maltepe Üniversitesi) sunulan olan bildiri. Mackey, A. ve S. M. Gass. (2005). Second language research, methodology and design. Lawrence Erlbaum Association, Publishers.
  9. Oshima, D. Y. (2006). On Exceptional zibun binding: An experimental approach. www.standford.edu/~davidyo/docs/ezb.pdf [29/1/2006]
  10. Smith, M. (2004). Light and heavy reflexives. Linguistics 42 (3), 573-615.
  11. Song, H. (2006). Antecedents and anaphors in Korean, http://ling.wisc.edu/lso/wigl2006/song. html [4/5/2006]
  12. Sturt, P. (2003). A new look at the syntax-discourse interface: The use of binding principles in sentence processing. Journal of psycholinguistic research 32 (2), 125-139.