SavedAdd your journal

Journals / European Journal of Technique (EJT) / 2026 / Cilt: 16 Sayı: 1

Federated Deep Learning for Brain Tumor Segmentation: Comparative Analysis of U-Net Architectures

Beyin Tümörü Segmentasyonu için Federatif Derin Öğrenme: U-Net Mimarilerinin Karşılaştırmalı Analizi

Ataberk Urfalı(KONYA TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-5709-6718
Sait Ali Uymaz(KONYA TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-2748-8483
Özgü Can(EGE UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-8064-2905
Pages
51–59
Publication Date
2026-07-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our federated approach preserves data privacy while achieving comparable accuracy to centralized methods, demonstrating comprehensive evaluation of attention-based federated learning for multi-institutional brain tumor segmentation with statistical significance validation across three consecutive challenge datasets.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Medical image segmentation is essential for precise diagnosis and treatment planning, particularly in brain tumor analysis where accurate boundary delineation directly impacts surgical outcomes and therapeutic decisions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We propose a federated deep learning framework that enables collaborative brain tumor segmentation model training without compromising patient data privacy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our federated approach preserves data privacy while achieving comparable accuracy to centralized methods, demonstrating comprehensive evaluation of attention-based federated learning for multi-institutional brain tumor segmentation with statistical significance validation across three consecutive challenge datasets.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2019-2021 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Beyin tümörü segmentasyonu · Federatif öğrenme · U-Net

Abstract

Medical image segmentation is essential for precise diagnosis and treatment planning, particularly in brain tumor analysis where accurate boundary delineation directly impacts surgical outcomes and therapeutic decisions. However, privacy concerns and regulatory constraints limit data sharing across healthcare institutions, restricting the development of robust deep learning models that require large, diverse training datasets. We propose a federated deep learning framework that enables collaborative brain tumor segmentation model training without compromising patient data privacy. Our approach implements three U-Net architectural variants (standard U-Net, Residual U-Net, and Attention U-Net) across multi-institutional BraTS datasets (2019-2021) using the Federated Averaging algorithm. Performance evaluation on three tumor sub-regions (whole tumor, tumor core, enhancing tumor) demonstrates that federated Attention U-Net achieves Dice scores of 0.905, 0.859, and 0.811 respectively on BraTS 2021, representing only 0.8% degradation compared to centralized training while enabling privacy-preserving collaboration. Our federated approach preserves data privacy while achieving comparable accuracy to centralized methods, demonstrating comprehensive evaluation of attention-based federated learning for multi-institutional brain tumor segmentation with statistical significance validation across three consecutive challenge datasets.

🔖

Cite This Article

Urfalı, A., Uymaz, S. A., Can, Ö. (2026). Federated Deep Learning for Brain Tumor Segmentation: Comparative Analysis of U-Net Architectures. European Journal of Technique (EJT), Cilt: 16 Sayı: 1, 51–59. https://doi.org/10.36222/ejt.1828083

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (42)

  1. S. Bauer, R. Wiest, L. P. Nolte, and M. Reyes, "A survey of MRI-based medical image analysis for brain tumor studies," Phys. Med. Biol., vol. 58, no. 13, pp. R97–R129, 2013.W.-K. Chen, Linear Networks and Systems. Belmont, CA, USA: Wadsworth, 1993, pp. 123–135.
  2. B. H. Menze et al., "The Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS)," IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1993–2024, 2015.
  3. O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, and T. Brox, "U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation," in Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2015, 2015, pp. 234–241.
  4. Z. Zhang, Q. Liu, and Y. Wang, "Road extraction by deep residual U-Net," IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 749–753, 2018.
  5. O. Oktay et al., "Attention U-Net: Learning where to look for the pancreas," arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.03999, 2018.
  6. S. Bakas et al., "Advancing the cancer genome atlas glioma MRI collections with expert segmentation labels and radiomic features," Sci. Data, vol. 4, pp. 170117, 2017.
  7. N. J. Tustison et al., "Optimal symmetric multimodal templates and concatenated random forests for supervised brain tumor segmentation (simplified) with ANTsR," Neuroinformatics, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 209–225, 2015.
  8. F. Isensee et al., "nnU-Net: a self-adapting framework for U-Net-based medical image segmentation," Nat. Methods, vol. 18, pp. 203–211, 2021.
  9. A. Myronenko, "3D MRI brain tumor segmentation using autoencoder regularization," in Brainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries, vol. 11383, 2019, pp. 311–320.
  10. European Union, "General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)," Regulation (EU) 2016/679, 2016.
  11. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, "Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)," 1996.
  12. S. Pereira, A. Pinto, V. Alves, and C. A. Silva, "Brain tumor segmentation using convolutional neural networks in MRI images," IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1240–1251, 2016.
  13. B. McMahan, E. Moore, D. Ramage, S. Hampson, and B. A. y. Arcas, "Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data," in Proc. 20th Int. Conf. Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS), 2017, pp. 1273–1282.
  14. R. C. Geyer, T. Klein, and M. Nabi, "Differentially private federated learning: A client level perspective," arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.07557, 2017.
  15. P. Kairouz et al., "Advances and open problems in federated learning," Found. Trends Mach. Learn., vol. 14, no. 1–2, pp. 1–210, 2021.
  16. M. J. Sheller et al., "Federated learning in medicine: facilitating multi-institutional collaborations without sharing patient data," Sci. Rep., vol. 10, pp. 12598, 2020.
  17. S. Silva et al., "Federated learning in breast density classification," arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.02135, 2019.
  18. I. Dayan et al., "Federated learning for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19," Nat. Med., vol. 27, pp. 1735–1743, 2021.
  19. J. Xu et al., "Federated learning for ophthalmology: a new collaborative paradigm," Ophthalmol. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 100017, 2021.
  20. M. J. Sheller, G. A. Reina, B. Edwards, J. Martin, and S. Bakas, "Multi-institutional deep learning modeling without sharing patient data: A feasibility study on brain tumor segmentation," in Brainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries, Springer, Cham, 2019, pp. 92–104.
  21. W. Li et al., "Privacy-preserving federated brain tumour segmentation," in Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, Springer, Cham, 2019, pp. 133–141.
  22. P. Guo, P. Wang, J. Zhou, S. Jiang, and V. M. Patel, "Multi-institutional collaborations for improving deep learning-based magnetic resonance image reconstruction using federated learning," in Proc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2021, pp. 2423–2432.
  23. R. Kumar, S. Maity, S. Saha, and S. K. Bandyopadhyay, "Brain tumor segmentation using blockchain-federated learning and 3D U-Net," in Brainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries, Springer, Cham, 2020, pp. 450–462.
  24. L. Yi, J. Zhang, R. Zhang, J. Shi, G. Wang, and X. Liu, "SU-Net: An efficient encoder-decoder model of federated learning for brain tumor segmentation," in Artificial Neural Networks and Machine Learning – ICANN 2020, Springer, Cham, 2020, pp. 761–773.
  25. C. Liu et al., "FedMEPD: Federated multi-modal encoders with partially personalized decoders for brain tumor segmentation," Med. Image Anal., vol. 97, pp. 103274, 2025.
  26. M. Manthe, S. Duffner, and C. Lartizien, "Federated brain tumor segmentation: An extensive benchmark," Med. Image Anal., vol. 97, pp. 10 A. Asmita and P. Mittal, "Enhancing traditional learning mechanism of brain tumor segmentation for BraTS 23 employing contrastive learning," Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 112, pp. 108460, 2025.3270, 2024.
  27. A. Asmita and P. Mittal, "Enhancing traditional learning mechanism of brain tumor segmentation for BraTS 23 employing contrastive learning," Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 112, pp. 108460, 2025.
  28. Z. Zhou et al., "Comprehensive exploiting local and global features for brain tumor segmentation: A gated dual-branch hybrid attention mechanism," Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 110, pp. 108285, 2025.
  29. W. Liu, J. Hou, X. Zhong, H. Zhan, J. Cheng, and G. Yue, "Improving multi-modal brain tumor segmentation via pre-training and knowledge distillation based post-training," Neurocomputing, vol. 640, pp. 130318, 2025.
  30. J. Su, Z. Luo, C. Wang, S. Lian, X. Lin, and S. Li, "Reconstruct incomplete relation for incomplete modality brain tumor segmentation," Neural Networks, vol. 180, pp. 106657, 2024.
  31. R. Lei, Y. Zhu, H. Liu, Y. Xu, and Q. Cai, "FE-Unet: A lightweight brain tumor segmentation network combining frequency domain processing and edge preservation," Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 110, pp. 108274, 2025.
  32. M. F. Ahamed et al., "Classification and segmentation on multi-regional brain tumors using volumetric images of MRI with customized 3D U-Net framework," Comput. Med. Imaging Graph., vol. 110, pp. 102313, 2023.
  33. J. Nalepa, M. Marcinkiewicz, and M. Kawulok, "Data augmentation for brain-tumor segmentation: a review," Front. Comput. Neurosci., vol. 13, pp. 83, 2019.
  34. A. Chowdhury, H. Kassem, N. Padoy, and A. Karargyris, "A review of medical federated learning: Applications in oncology and cancer research," in Brainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries, Springer, Cham, 2022, pp. 3–24.
  35. R. Ranjbarzadeh, A. Caputo, E. B. Tirkolaee, and S. Jafarzadeh Ghoushchi, "Brain tumor segmentation of MRI images: A comprehensive review on the application of artificial intelligence tools," Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., vol. 152, pp. 106405, 2023.
  36. A. Wadhwa, A. Bhardwaj, and V. S. Verma, "A review on brain tumor segmentation of MRI images," Magn. Reson. Imaging, vol. 61, pp. 247–259, 2019.
  37. S. Nalawade et al., "Federated learning for brain tumor segmentation using MRI and transformers," in Brainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries, 2021, pp. 444–456.
  38. A. Tuladhar et al., "Federated learning using variable local training for brain tumor segmentation," in Brainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries, 2022, pp. 298–309.
  39. M. I. Khan et al., "Adaptive weight aggregation in federated learning for brain tumor segmentation," in Brainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries, 2022, pp. 156–167.
  40. X. Xu et al., "Federated cross learning for medical image segmentation," IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1572–1583, 2022.
  41. D. H. Mahlool and M. H. Abed, "Survey on federated learning: Concept and applications," in Mobile Computing and Sustainable Informatics, 2022, pp. 337–351.
  42. W. Dai et al., "LACCA: A lightweight adaptive clustered client aggregation for federated learning," IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1945–1958, 2024.