Journals / Interdisciplinary Medical Journal / 2025 / Volume: 16 Issue: 56

The relationship between anxiety levels, coping styles and behavioral patterns of medical students

Hülya Güç(Hatay Mustafa Kemal University Tayfur Ata Sökmen Faculty of Medicine, Department Medical Education, Hatay, Türkiye)0000-0001-6998-7497
Asena Ayça Özdemir(Mersin University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Education, Mersin, Türkiye)0000-0002-0108-1880
İbrahim Başhan(Mersin University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Education, Mersin, Türkiye)0000-0002-0034-2727
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-12-16
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Structured and directive behaviors may help reduce anxiety, while positive learning environments that consider individual differences can enhance academic and professional outcomes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the association between anxiety levels and stress-coping strategies of preclinical medical students, based on their behavioral patterns.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: This cross-sectional study involved 180 volunteer preclinical medical students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Structured and directive behaviors may help reduce anxiety, while positive learning environments that consider individual differences can enhance academic and professional outcomes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Behavioral patterns · coping styles · medical students

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the association between anxiety levels and stress-coping strategies of preclinical medical students, based on their behavioral patterns. Method: This cross-sectional study involved 180 volunteer preclinical medical students. Data were obtained through the Demographic Form, Stress Coping Styles, Anxiety, and Behavioral Patterns Inventory. As the data were not normally distributed (the Shapiro–Wilk test), non-parametric analyses were used: Mann–Whitney U for two groups, Kruskal–Wallis for multiple groups, and Spearman’s correlation for associations. Reliability was tested with Cronbach’s alpha, and significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: The mean age of 180 participants in this study was 20.34 ± 1.84 years. Pressures coping styles scale (SCSS) scores showed a weak positive correlation with the “Director” behavior pattern (r = 0.27; p = 0.047) and a weak negative (but statistically non-significant) correlation with the “Relater” pattern(r = -0.26; p = 0.055) in second-year medical students. A significant difference was found between the groups in terms of Submissive Approach (SA) scores (p = 0.040), with second-year students scoring higher than those of first-year students (p < 0.05). Similarly, the mean SCSS scores of second-year students were significantly higher than those of first-year students (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Examining the relationship between medical students’ anxiety levels and behavioral patterns is essential for improving medical education practices and strengthening students’ psychological resilience. Structured and directive behaviors may help reduce anxiety, while positive learning environments that consider individual differences can enhance academic and professional outcomes.

🔖

Cite This Article

Güç, H., Özdemir, A. A., Başhan, İ. (2025). The relationship between anxiety levels, coping styles and behavioral patterns of medical students. Interdisciplinary Medical Journal, Volume: 16 Issue: 56. https://doi.org/10.17944/interdiscip.1739456

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (25)

  1. Gross JJ, John OP. Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;85(2):348–62.
  2. Fleishman EA. The leadership opinion questionnaire. In: Stogdill RM, Coons AE, editors. Leader behavior and its description and measurement. Columbus (OH): Bureau of Business Research, Ohio State University; 1957.
  3. Marynissen HM. The relationship between organisational communication and perception. Acta Chir Belg. 2011;111(4):193–9.
  4. Merrill D, Reid R. Personal styles and effective performance: Make your style work for you. Radnor (PA): Chilton Book Company; 1981.
  5. Doğan B, Eser M. Üniversite öğrencilerinin stresle başa çıkma yöntemleri: Nazilli MYO örneği. Electron J Vocational Colleges. 2013;UMYOS Özel Sayı:29–39.
  6. Alharbi ES, Smith AP. Review of the literature on stress and wellbeing of international students in English speaking countries. Int Educ Stud. 2018;11(6):22. doi:10.5539/ies.v11n6p22.
  7. Mussi FC, Pires CGDS, Carneiro LS, Costa ALS, Ribeiro FMS, Santos AFD. Comparison of stress in freshman and senior nursing students. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2019;53(3):e03431. doi:10.1590/S1980-220X2017023503431.
  8. Pehlivan NN. Üniversite öğrencilerinin stresle başa çıkma tarzlarına göre üniversite yaşamına uyum düzeyinin incelenmesi. Ekev Akad Derg. 2023;(100):175–85.
  9. Özkubat S, Çakmak A. Üniversite öğrencilerinin stresle başa çıkma yöntemlerinin incelenmesi. Akademik Bakış Derg. 2017;(64):286–94.
  10. Çuhadaroğlu F. Ergenlik döneminde psikolojik gelişim özellikleri. Katkı Pediatri Dergisi. 2000;21(6):863–8.
  11. Kaya M, Genç M, Kaya B, Pehlivan E. Tıp fakültesi ve sağlık yüksekokulu öğrencilerinde depresif belirti yaygınlığı, stresle başa çıkma tarzları ve etkileyen faktörler. Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2007;18:137–46.
  12. Ergin A, Uzun SU, Bozkurt Aİ. Tıp fakültesi öğrencilerinde stresle başa çıkma yöntemleri ve bu yöntemlerin sosyodemografik özelliklerle ilişkisi. Fırat Tıp Derg. 2014;19(1):31–7.
  13. Malakcioglu C. Validity and reliability of the Anxiety Assessment Scale: A new three-dimensional perspective. Medeni Med J. 2022;37:165–72.
  14. Şahin NH, Durak A. Stresle başa çıkma tarzları ölçeği: Üniversite öğrencileri için uyarlanması. Turk Psikoloji Derg. 1995;10(34):56–73.
  15. Folkman S, Lazarus RS. Ways of Coping Questionnaire (WAYS) [database record]. APA PsycTests; 1988. https://doi.org/10.1037/t06501-000
  16. Başhan İ, Selvi H, Özdemir AA. Behavioral Patterns Inventory: A reliability and validity study. J Human Sci. 2022;19(1):56–68. doi:10.14687/jhs.v19i1.6274.
  17. Gömleksiz M, Yakar B, Pirinçci E. Tıp Fakültesi öğrencilerinin sağlıklı yaşam biçimi davranışları ve ilişkili faktörler. Dicle Med J. 2020;47(2):347–58.
  18. Li W, Zhao Z, Chen D, Peng Y, Lu Z. Prevalence and associated factors of depression and anxiety symptoms among college students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2022;63(11):1222–30.
  19. Sattar K, Yusoff MSB, Arifin WN, Yasin MAM, Nor MZM. Effective coping strategies utilised by medical students for mental health disorders during undergraduate medical education: a scoping review. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):121.
  20. Van der Merwe LJ, Botha A, Joubert G. Resilience and coping strategies of undergraduate medical students at the University of the Free State. S Afr J Psychiatr. 2020;:26:1471. doi:10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v26i0.1471.
  21. Carver CS, Connor-Smith J. Personality and coping. Annu Rev Psychol. 2010;61:679–704.
  22. Kasi PM, Naqvi HA, Afghan AK, Khawar T, Khan FH, Khan UZ, et al. Coping styles in patients with anxiety and depression. ISRN Psychiatry. 2012;2012:128672.
  23. Gruszczyńska M, Bąk-Sosnowska M, Daniel-Sielańczyk A, Wyszomirska J, Modrzejewska A. The Style of Coping with Stress, the Health-Related Locus of Control, and the Level of Mindfulness of Patients with Chronic Somatic Diseases in Comparison to Healthy People. Healthcare (Basel). 2022;10(9):1752.
  24. Sheldon E, Simmonds-Buckley M, Bone C, Mascarenhas T, Chan N, Wincott M et al. Prevalence and risk factors for mental health problems in university undergraduate students: A systematic review with meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2021;287:282-92.
  25. Chan SF, DeWitt D, Chin HL. Intercultural Communicative Competence among Mandarin as a Foreign Language Learners in a Malaysian Polytechnic. Jurnal Kurikulum&Pengajaran Asia Pasifik. 2018;6(3):32-48.