Journals / Interdisciplinary Medical Journal / 2026 / Volume: 17 Issue: 58

The role of general surgeons as manpower in colonoscopic screening programs

Gürkan Güneri(BİLECİK ŞEYH EDEBALİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0001-6749-2159
Mücahit Ünal(BİLECİK ŞEYH EDEBALİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0001-9941-5166
Mehmet Emin Gönüllü(BİLECİK ŞEYH EDEBALİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0001-9126-2396
Doğuşcan Kurular(BİLECİK ŞEYH EDEBALİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0003-2511-3792
Kadir Çorbacı(BİLECİK ŞEYH EDEBALİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0001-7616-4798
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-08-23
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The overall polyp detection rate was 24.6%, increasing significantly with age (p=0.009).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality, and screening colonoscopies are crucial for early diagnosis and treatment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of colonoscopies performed by general surgeons between 1 January 2023 and 1 January 2025.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The overall polyp detection rate was 24.6%, increasing significantly with age (p=0.009).
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:colonoscopy · polypectomy · Quality indicator

Abstract

Objective: Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality, and screening colonoscopies are crucial for early diagnosis and treatment. This study evaluates the quality of colonoscopies performed by general surgeons in a single center based on international standards. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of colonoscopies performed by general surgeons between 1 January 2023 and 1 January 2025. Quality indicators were assessed in accordance with recommendations from the American Gastroenterological Association. Results: Statistical analyses were performed with significance set at p < 0.05. A total of 894 colonoscopies were included in the analysis (48.1% female and 51.9% male patients). Adequate bowel preparation was achieved in 88.0% of cases. The overall polyp detection rate was 24.6%, increasing significantly with age (p=0.009). In the screening age group (50–70 years), the polyp detection rate was 26.7%, while the adenoma detection rate was 18.6%. Polyps were more commonly detected in males than females in the screening group (30.8% versus 22.6%, p = 0.028). Most polyps were solitary (69.5%) and located in the distal colon (65.9%). Histopathological examination revealed adenomas in 72.7% of cases and carcinoma in 8.2% of cases. Conclusion: Colonoscopies performed by general surgeons in our unit demonstrated acceptable bowel preparation rates and polyp detection outcomes comparable to national data, though adenoma detection rates remained below international benchmarks. Given the workforce constraints in colorectal cancer screening, general surgeons can play a significant role in meeting screening demands and thereby enhance the effectiveness of screening colonoscopy programs.

🔖

Cite This Article

Güneri, G., Ünal, M., Gönüllü, M. E., Kurular, D., Çorbacı, K. (2026). The role of general surgeons as manpower in colonoscopic screening programs. Interdisciplinary Medical Journal, Volume: 17 Issue: 58. https://doi.org/10.17944/interdiscip.1936516

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Liang PS, Dominitz JA. Colorectal Cancer Screening. Medical Clinics of North America. 2019;103(1):111–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2018.08.010
  2. Leung WCY, Foo DCC, Chan TT, Chiang MF, Lam AHK, Chan HHW, et al. Alternatives to colonoscopy for population-wide colorectal cancer screening. Hong Kong Medical Journal. 2016;22(1):70–7. doi:10.12809/HKMJ154685 PubMed PMID: 26744124.
  3. Segnan N, Patnick J, von Karsa; Lawrence, editors, Keskinkılıç B, Gültekin M, Karaca AS, Öztürk C, Hacıkamiloğlu E, Boztaş G, et al., translators. Kolorektal Kanser Taraması ve Teşhisinde Avrupa Birliği Kalite Rehberi [Internet]. 1st ed. Vol. 1. Belçika: Özyurt Matbaacılık; 2010 [cited 2026 Jan 11]. Available from: www.kayihanajans.com doi:10.2772/1458
  4. Bulur A, Yumuştutan P. Kolorektal polip sonuçlarımız; endoskopik ve histolojik verilerimizin güncel çalışmalarla karşılaştırılması. Endoskopi Gastrointestinal. 2020;28(3):113–8. https://doi.org/10.17940/endoskopi.827743
  5. Eminler AT, Sakalli M, Irak K, Ayyildiz T, Keskn M, Gülten M, et al. Gastroenteroloji ünitemizdeki kolonoskopik polipektomi sonuçlarımız. Akademik Gastroenteroloji Dergisi. 2011;10(3):112–5.
  6. Endoskopi Hakkında Bilgilendirme | Türk Cerrahi Derneği [Internet]. [cited 2026 Jan 19]. Available from: https://www.turkcer.org.tr/endoskopi-hakkinda-bilgilendirme
  7. Rex DK, Anderson JC, Butterly LF, Day LW, Dominitz JA, Kaltenbach T, et al. Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2024;119(9):1754–80. doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000002972 PubMed PMID: 39167112
  8. Bretthauer M, Løberg M, Wieszczy P, Kalager M, Emilsson L, Garborg K, et al. Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(17):1547–56. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2208375
  9. Sulz MC, Kröger A, Prakash M, Manser CN, Heinrich H, Misselwitz B. Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Bowel Preparation on Adenoma Detection: Early Adenomas Affected Stronger than Advanced Adenomas. PLoS One. 2016;11(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154149
  10. Pinto RC, Seabra MK, Cunha AA Da, Pagano CGM, Mussnich HG. Assessment of Quality Indexes in Colonoscopy in the Coloproctology Service of a Tertiary Private Hospital in Southern Brazil. J Coloproctol. 2021;41(1):23–9. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1724070
  11. Gul MO, Akcicek M, Iflazoglu N, Corbaci K, Emir CA, Guzel M, et al. Diagnostic Benefits and Surgical Implications of Methods for Tumor Localization in Sigmoid and Rectum Tumors. Diagnostics. 2024;14(13):1363. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14131363
  12. Nüfus İstatistikleri Portalı [Internet]. [cited Jan 31, 2026]. Available from: https://nip.tuik.gov.tr/?value=YasGrubunaGoreNufus
  13. Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, Fix OK, Jacobson BC. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69(3 Suppl):620–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.057
  14. Bretthauer M, Løberg M, Wieszczy P, Kalager M, Emilsson L, Garborg K, et al. Effect of Colonoscopy Screening on Risks of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(17):1547–56. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2208375