Journals / Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi / 2019 / Sayı: 2

A THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY: THE SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT SCALEFOR SELF-EFFICACY

Bir Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması: Öz-Yeterlik için Semptom Yönetim Ölçeği

Pages
350–355
Publication Date
2019-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The reliability tests were also done with these data.Results: TheTurkish validity and reliability study of the Symptom Management Scale for Self-efficacy found that the scale had favorable fit indices χ2=223,14, X2/SD=4.13, RMSEA=0.077, CFI=0.90, IFI=0.91, NNFI=0.90 and NFI=0.91 , and included one dimension and 12 questions.Conclusion: This study prepared a Turkish version of the Symptom Management Scale for Self-efficacy and contributed to the national literature

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The purpose of this study was to conduct the validity and reliability study of the Symptom Management Scale for Self-efficacy and to contribute to the national literature with this scale.Materials-Methods: The study used the Symptom Management Scale for Self-efficacy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The researcher primarily checked the language and content validity of the scale to do the validity and reliability studies of the scale in Turkish.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The reliability tests were also done with these data.Results: TheTurkish validity and reliability study of the Symptom Management Scale for Self-efficacy found that the scale had favorable fit indices χ2=223,14, X2/SD=4.13, RMSEA=0.077, CFI=0.90, IFI=0.91, NNFI=0.90 and NFI=0.91 , and included one dimension and 12 questions.Conclusion: This study prepared a Turkish version of the Symptom Management Scale for Self-efficacy and contributed to the national literature
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Self-efficacy · symptom management · chronic diseases

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to conduct the validity and reliability study of the Symptom Management Scale for Self-efficacy and to contribute to the national literature with this scale.Materials-Methods: The study used the Symptom Management Scale for Self-efficacy. It has 13 items. The researcher primarily checked the language and content validity of the scale to do the validity and reliability studies of the scale in Turkish. Then, the Turkish scale, which was shaped by language and content validity studies, was administered to individuals with chronic diseases being treated in two hospitals. The collected data from this administration were evaluated using the structural equivalence model to test the construct validity of the scale. The reliability tests were also done with these data.Results: TheTurkish validity and reliability study of the Symptom Management Scale for Self-efficacy found that the scale had favorable fit indices χ2=223,14, X2/SD=4.13, RMSEA=0.077, CFI=0.90, IFI=0.91, NNFI=0.90 and NFI=0.91 , and included one dimension and 12 questions.Conclusion: This study prepared a Turkish version of the Symptom Management Scale for Self-efficacy and contributed to the national literature

Özet

Amaç: Bu araştırmanın amacı; Öz-Yeterlik için Semptom Yönetim Ölçeği’nin Türkçe geçerlik ve güvenilirlik çalışmasını yaparak bu ölçeği ulusal literatüre kazandırmaktır.Gereç-Yöntem: Araştırmada, 13 ifadeden oluşan Öz-Yeterlik için Semptom Yönetim Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Öncelikle ölçeğin Türkçe geçerlik ve güvenilirlik çalışmalarının yapılabilmesi için dil ve kapsam geçerlikleri yapılmış, dil ve kapsam geçerlikleri sonucunda oluşan Türkçe ölçek; iki farklı hastanede tedavi gören kronik hastalığa sahip bireylere uygulanmıştır. Bu uygulamadan elde edilen veriler, ilk olarak ölçeğin yapı geçerliğini test etmek adına yapısal eşitlik modeli kullanılarak değerlendirilmiş ve yine güvenilirlik testleri de bu veriler üzerinden gerçekleştirilmiştir.Bulgular: Öz-Yeterlik için Semptom Yönetim Ölçeği’nin Türkçe geçerlik ve güvenilirlik çalışması sonucunda iyi derecede uyum indekslerine sahip olduğu χ2=223,14, X2/sd= 4.13, RMSEA=0.077, CFI=0.90, IFI=0.91, NNFI=0,90 ve NFI=0,91 ; 1 boyut ve 12 sorudan oluştuğu ortaya konulmuştur.Sonuç: Bu araştırmada, Öz-Yeterlik için Semptom Yönetim Ölçeği’nin Türkçe versiyonu elde edilerek ulusal literatüre bu ölçeğin kazandırılmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZEL, F., ÖZKRAMAN, A., AYKAR, F. Ş. (2019). A THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY: THE SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT SCALEFOR SELF-EFFICACY. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, Sayı: 2, 350–355. https://ajindex.com/articles/162908

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. World Health Organization (WHO). Noncommunicable diseases. Update 2017. Available from http://www.who.int/topics/ noncommunicable_diseases/en/ World Health Organization (WHO). Non communicable diseases country profiles 2014. 2014b
  2. Nolte E, Knai C, McKee M. Managing chronic conditions experience in eight countries. World Health Organization 2008, on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. ISBN:978 92 890 4294 9. p.1–5.
  3. Chen MF, Wang RH, Lin KC, Hsu HY, Chen SW. Efficacy of an empowerment program for Taiwanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled trial. Appl Nurs Res 2015;28:366–73. [CrossRef] World Health Organization (WHO). Health education in self care: Possibilities and limitations. Report of a Scientific Consultation 1983;21–25 November: Available from http://apps.who.int/iris/ bitstream/10665/70092/1/HED_84.1.pdf Richard AA, Shea K. Delineation of self-care and associated concepts. J Nurs Scholarsh 2011;43:255–64. [CrossRef] Schulman-Green D, Jaser S, Martin F, Alonzo A, Grey M, McCorkle R, et al. Processes of self-management in chronic illness. J Nurs Scholarsh 2012;44:136–44. [CrossRef] Bahouq H, Rkain H, Allali F, Hassouni NH. Self esteem in patients with ankylosing spondylitis and its relationships with disease-specific variables and psychological status. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;71:562–3. [CrossRef] Oksman E, Linna M, Hörhammer L, Lammintakanen J, Talja M. Cost- effectiveness analysis for a tele-based health coaching program for chronic disease in primary care. BMC Halth Serv Res 2017;17:138. [CrossRef] Lorig K, Ritter PL, Moreland C, Laurent DD. Can a box mailed materials achieve the triple aims of health care? The mailed chronic disease self-management tool kit study. Health Promot Pract 2015;16:765– 74. [CrossRef] Clark NM, Dodge JA. Exploring self-efficacy as a predictor of disease management. Health Educ Behav 1999;26:72–89. [CrossRef] Lang, CA, Conrad S, Garrett L, Battistutta D, Cooksley WG, Dunne MP, Macdonald GA. Symptom prevalence and clustering of symptoms in people living with chronic hepatitis C infection. J Pain Symptom Manage 2006;31:335–44. [CrossRef] Riazi A, Thompson AJ, Hobart JC. Self-efficacy predicts self-reported health status in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2004;10:61–6. [CrossRef] Chen MF, Wang RH, Hung SL. Predicting health promoting self-care behaviors in people with pre-diabetes by applying Bandura social learning theory. Appl Nurs Res 2015;28:299–304. [CrossRef] Bandura A. Self-