Journals / ACH Medical journal / 2026 / Volume: 3 Issue: 2

Septo-columellar reconstruction with radial forearm free flap

Ceyhun Uzun(KOCAELİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-3225-7356
Emrah Kağan Yaşar(KOCAELİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-0572-1248
Yusuf Alper Aytaç(KOCAELİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-7792-4389
Zeynep Banu Arıcı(KOCAELİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6729-1648
Murat Şahin Alagöz(KOCAELİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-5521-7173
Pages
—
Publication Date
2024-06-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

RFFF provides an excellent option for optimal septocolumellar reconstruction deriving from a variety of etiologies with the disadvantage of sacrificing a main artery in upper extremity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introductıon: Columellar subunit reconstruction is described as one the most challenging area in the literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Patients who have large composite defects in the septocolumellar region and have been reconstructed with RFFF between 2018-2021 were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:RFFF provides an excellent option for optimal septocolumellar reconstruction deriving from a variety of etiologies with the disadvantage of sacrificing a main artery in upper extremity.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018-2021 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Columella · Nasal septum · Radial Forearm Free Flap

Abstract

Introductıon: Columellar subunit reconstruction is described as one the most challenging area in the literature. Radial forearm free flap (RFFF) can easily provide the reconstruction of columella and neighbouring regions with different styles of designs and different types of tissues included if needed. Methods: Patients who have large composite defects in the septocolumellar region and have been reconstructed with RFFF between 2018-2021 were included in the study. Patients’ age, gender, etiology of septocolumellar defect, anatomical deficiencies on nose, flap sizes and designs, cartilage donor site, recipient vessels, flap donor site repair methods, time of hospital stay, and complications were investigated. Results: Six patients, comprising five males and one female with an average age of 50.8 years, were evaluated. The etiologies were congenital agenesis in one patient, trauma in two patients, and tumors in three patients. Adipofascial radial forearm free flaps (RFFF) were utilized in two patients, with primary closure of the donor sites. To prevent excessive skin thickness in septal mucosal reconstruction, only adipofascial flaps were employed. The facial artery and vein served as the recipient vessels in all cases, with the pedicle tunneled from the nasal region to the submandibular region. The average flap size was 5.08 x 4.66 cm. Septal cartilage was used to create the cartilage framework in two cases, while costal cartilage was used in the remaining cases. The mean operation time was 6.6 hours, the average ICU stay was 16.3 hours, and the mean hospitalization duration was 6.5 days. Complications included scar spread and synechia at the flap donor site in two different patients. Conclusion: Using the facial artery and vein for recipient vessels makes the new skin scarring away from midface area. RFFF provides an excellent option for optimal septocolumellar reconstruction deriving from a variety of etiologies with the disadvantage of sacrificing a main artery in upper extremity.

🔖

Cite This Article

Uzun, C., Yaşar, E. K., Aytaç, Y. A., Arıcı, Z. B., Alagöz, M. Ş. (2024). Septo-columellar reconstruction with radial forearm free flap. ACH Medical journal, Volume: 3 Issue: 2. https://ajindex.com/articles/1628838

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (35)

  1. Mavili ME, Akyurek M. Congenital isolated absence of the nasal columella: Reconstruction with an internal nasal vestibular skin flap and bilateral mucosa flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000. doi:10.1097/00006534-200008000-00022
  2. Benito-ruiz J, Raigosa M, Yoon TS. Columella Reconstruction Using a Free Flap From the First Web Space of the Foot. 2012;69(3):279-282. doi:10.1097/SAP.0b013e31822af8b9
  3. Tzur R. Columellar reconstruction: a refinement of technique. 2018;19(2):148-151.
  4. Jayarajan R. Total columella reconstruction using nasocheek flap and septal cartilage graft. Plast Reconstr Surg - Glob Open. 2015. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000000538
  5. Bouguila J, Zairi I, Yacoub K, et al. Columella defects: Yet a challenge! Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2008. doi:10.1016/j.anplas.2008.04.003
  6. Faris C, Vuyk HD. Reconstruction of Nasal Tip and Columella. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2011. doi:10.1016/j.fsc.2010.10.012
  7. ROBINSON JK, DILLIG G. The Advantages of Delayed Nasal Full-Thickness Skin Grafting After Mohs Micrographic Surgery. Dermatologic Surg. 2002. doi:10.1097/00042728-200209000-00013
  8. Rustemeyer J, Günther L, Bremerich A. Complications after nasal skin repair with local flaps and full-thickness skin grafts and implications of patients’ contentment. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009. doi:10.1007/s10006-008-0139-z
  9. Chang CS, Swanson JW, Wilson A, Low DW, Bartlett SP. Columellar Reconstruction following Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Injury. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000003978
  10. Son D, Kwak M, Yun S, Yeo H, Kim J, Han K. Large auricular chondrocutaneous composite graft for nasal alar and columellar reconstruction. Arch Plast Surg. 2012. doi:10.5999/aps.2012.39.4.323
  11. Odobescu A, Servant JM, Danino IW, Danino MA. Nostril alar rim threshold flap for columellar reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 2011. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2011.01.004
  12. Bilkay U, Tokat C, Ozek C, Erdem O, Cagdas A. Reconstruction of Congenital Absent Columella. J Craniofac Surg. 2004. doi:10.1097/00001665-200401000-00018
  13. Scott AR, Boahene KD. A novel approach to columellar reconstruction in a child. Laryngoscope. 2018. doi:10.1002/lary.27229
  14. Agrawal K, Shrotriya R, Pabari M. An innovative technique for columellar reconstruction using ‘flip-over’ Buccal mucosa flap. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2016. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2016/19864.8111
  15. Jang SY, Kim WS, Kim HK, Bae TH. Nasal columellar reconstruction with reverse lateral nasal artery pedicled nasolabial island flap. J Craniofac Surg. 2018. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000004268
  16. Sherris DA, Fuerstenberg J, Danahey D, Hilger PA. Reconstruction of the nasal columella. Arch facial Plast Surg Off Publ Am Acad Facial Plast Reconstr Surgery, Inc Int Fed Facial Plast Surg Soc. 2002. doi:10.1001/archfaci.4.1.42
  17. Younger RAL. The versatile melolabial flap. Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg. 1992. doi:10.1177/019459988910700602.1
  18. Smart RJ, Yeoh MS, Kim DD. Paramedian Forehead Flap. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2014. doi:10.1016/j.coms.2014.05.008
  19. Zhu S, Liu Y, Zang M, et al. Facial Defect Reconstruction Using the True Scarless Pre-Expanded Forehead Flap. J Craniofac Surg. 2018. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000004450
  20. Prasanna NS. Nasal reconstruction with pre-laminated forehead flap. Indian J Plast Surg. 2017. doi:10.4103/ijps.IJPS_165_17
  21. Antunes MB, Chalian AA. Microvascular Reconstruction of Nasal Defects. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2011. doi:10.1016/j.fsc.2010.10.014
  22. Wei J, Chen Q, Herrler T, et al. Supermicrosurgical reconstruction of nasal tip defects using the preauricular reversed superficial temporal artery flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2019.06.028
  23. Stalder MW, Sosin M, Urbinelli LJ, et al. Avoiding Facial Incisions with Midface Free Tissue Transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg - Glob Open. 2017. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000001218
  24. Bayramiçli M. The distal dorsalis pedis flap for nasal tip reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg. 1996;49(5):325-327. doi:10.1016/S0007-1226(96)90165-4
  25. Beahm EK, Walton RL, Burget GC. Free first dorsal metacarpal artery flap for nasal lining. Microsurgery. 2005. doi:10.1002/micr.20163
  26. Walton RL, Burget GC, Beahm EK. Microsurgical reconstruction of the nasal lining. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005. doi:10.1097/01.PRS.0000164683.34767.2F
  27. Santamaria E, Granados M, Barrera-Franco JL. Radial forearm free tissue transfer for head and neck reconstruction: Versatility and reliability of a single donor site. Microsurgery. 2000. doi:10.1002/1098-2752(2000)20:4 3.0.CO;2-W
  28. Santamaria E. Sensation recovery on innervated radial forearm flap for hemiglossectomy reconstruction by using different recipient nerves. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999. doi:10.1097/00006534-199902000-00013
  29. Cordeiro PG, Bacilious N, Schantz S, Spiro R. The radial forearm osteocutaneous “sandwich” free flap for reconstruction of the bilateral subtotal maxillectomy defect. Ann Plast Surg. 1998. doi:10.1097/00000637-199804000-00013
  30. Pangrazi PP, De Francesco F, Di Rienzo A, Riccio M. Adipofascial Radial Forearm Free Flap for Anterior Skull Base Reconstruction in Complicated Forebrain Oncological Surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2019. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000005559
  31. Chhabra N, Houser SM. Endonasal repair of septal perforations using a rotational mucosal flap and acellular dermal interposition graft. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2012. doi:10.1002/alr.21030
  32. Helman S, Kadakia S, Guthrie A, Mourad M, Mashkevich G. Temporoparietal Fascia Free Flap for Nasoseptal Perforation Repair. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2018. doi:10.1055/s-0037-1604425
  33. Moscoso JF, Urken ML. Radial forearm flaps. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1994. doi:10.1201/b13386-26
  34. Cha YH, Nam W, Cha I-H, Kim HJ. Revisiting radial forearm free flap for successful venous drainage. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017. doi:10.1186/s40902-017-0110-8
  35. Tzur R. Columellar reconstruction: a refinement of technique. 2018;19(2):148-151.