AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightMoreover, the vast majority of participants using MHRS found the system to be of high quality
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Abstract
This study aims to determine the degree of satisfaction and accessibility with MHRS applications. In line with legal permissions, a comprehensive questionnaire survey was conducted with outpatients who visited a state hospital in Giresun for checkup or examination and the findings were analyzed using the SPSS 20.0 software. The sample size of the study was 500. A questionnaire form prepared by the researchers in accordance with the literature was used as the data collection tool. The data were collected face-to-face by 5 interviewers who had been trained on survey techniques and communication skills. According to the findings; the average age of the patients participating in the study was 26.7 ± 8.2. 62.8% of the participants were female. When the marital status was examined; 53.8% of them were single. In terms of the education level of the participants, it was observed that 46.07% were college or university graduates. 53.01% of the respondents answered the ‘How do you access the MHRS application?’ question “Using Alo 182 telephone line”. MHRS.gov.tr website was the second with 29.71%. This could be due to the inability to access smart phones or Internet because of the income of participants or the geography where they live. Moreover, many villages and towns do not have access to the Internet due to the rugged terrain of Giresun province and phone services are disrupted due to heavy winds and rainfall in the area. Moreover, the vast majority of participants using MHRS found the system to be of high quality
Özet
Bu çalışma; MHRS uygulamalarının memnuniyet ve erişilebilirlik derecesini belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Yasal izinler çerçevesinde Giresun’daki bir devlet hastanesine kontrol veya muayene olmak için gelen ayakta hastalara kapsamlı anket soruları yöneltilmiş ve elde edilen bulgular SPSS 20.0 programı ile değerlendirilmiştir. Araştırmanın örneklem büyüklüğü 2015 yılında ayakta hasta sayısı üzerinden hesaplanmış olup, %5 hata payı ve %95 güven aralığında 384 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Çalışmaya katılan örneklem sayısı ise 500’dür. Veri toplama aracı olarak araştırmacılar tarafından literatür bilgisi doğrultusunda oluşturulan Anket Formu kullanılmıştır. Veri toplanması, önceden anket yapım teknikleri ve iletişim kurma konularında eğitim verilmiş 5 anketör vasıtasıyla yüz yüze görüşme yöntemiyle gerçekleştirilmiştir. İstatistiksel testlerin anlamlılık düzeyi için p