Journals / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2018 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1

Surgical Site Infections in a Tertiary Referral Obstetric and Gynecologic Clinic Center in Istanbul and Review of the Literature

Pages
37–41
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

After surgical site infections occurred, diagnosis and proper management with antibiotics and wound care with debridement and secondary suturing is important.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to define characteristics of the patients who were readmitted with the diagnosis of surgical site infections after gynecologic or obstetric procedures and management of these patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:STUDY DESIGN: We examined 120 patients with surgical site infections that had been hospitalized and managed medically and/or surgically between April 2014 and April 2015.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:After surgical site infections occurred, diagnosis and proper management with antibiotics and wound care with debridement and secondary suturing is important.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to define characteristics of the patients who were readmitted with the diagnosis of surgical site infections after gynecologic or obstetric procedures and management of these patients. We also reviewed the literature in this context. STUDY DESIGN: We examined 120 patients with surgical site infections that had been hospitalized and managed medically and/or surgically between April 2014 and April 2015. Characteristics of the patients were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 33.4±11.8 years. The patients were readmitted for surgical site infections on the mean of 9.6±5.4 days after the first operation. The most frequent procedures resulted with SSI were cesarean delivery, abdominal hysterectomy and vaginal birth. When patients were compared according to these procedures, there were statistically significant differences regarding age, gravida, parity, preoperative white blood cell count, postoperative white blood cell count and antibiotics usage. CONCLUSION: Combining evidence-based surgical site infections prevention practices and clinician and patient cooperation will result in reduction in surgical site infections incidence following obstetric and gynecologic procedures. Because of economic burden and threat to the physical and psychological health of the patients, these modifiable risks should be recognized and surgical site infections should be minimized. After surgical site infections occurred, diagnosis and proper management with antibiotics and wound care with debridement and secondary suturing is important.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİK, H. G., ÇELİK, E., DİKMEN, S., KONAL, M., GEDİKBAŞI, A. (2018). Surgical Site Infections in a Tertiary Referral Obstetric and Gynecologic Clinic Center in Istanbul and Review of the Literature. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1, 37–41. https://ajindex.com/articles/162574

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Event. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/ pdfs/ pscmanual/9pscssicurrent.pdf. Accessed March 26, 2014
  2. Madeira MZ, Trabasso P. Surgical site infections in women and their association with clinical conditions. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2014 Jul;47(4):457-61
  3. Axelsson D, Blomberg M. Prevalence of postpartum infections: a population-based observational study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2014 Oct;93(10):1065-8
  4. Shrestha S, Shrestha R, Shrestha B, Dongol A. Incidence and risk factors of surgical site infection following cesarean section at Dhulikhel Hospital. Kathmandu Univ Med J 2014 Apr-Jun;12(46):113-6
  5. Mahdi H, Goodrich S, Lockhart D, DeBernardo R, Moslemi-Kebria M. Predictors of surgical site infection in women undergoing hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease: a multicenter analysis using the national surgical quality improvement program data. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014 Sep-Oct;21(5):901-9
  6. Lachiewicz MP, Moulton LJ, Jaiyeoba O. Pelvic surgical site infections in gynecologic surgery. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 2015:614950. doi: 10.1155/2015/614950
  7. Corcoran S, Jackson V, Coulter-Smith S, Loughrey J, McKenna P, Cafferkey M. Surgical site infection after cesarean section: implementing 3 changes to improve the quality of patient care. Am J Infect Control 2013 Dec; 41(12):1258-63
  8. Roberts S, Maccato M, Faro S, Pinell P. The microbiology of post-cesarean wound morbidity. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 81:383-6
  9. Mpogoro FJ, Mshana SE, Mirambo MM, Kidenya BR, Gumodoka B, Imirzalioglu C. Incidence and predictors of surgical site infections following caesarean sections at Bugando Medical Centre, Mwanza, Tanzania. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2014 Aug 11;3:25
  10. Cınar M, Timur H, Guzel AI, Tokmak A, Ersak B, Saygan S, et al. The association between preterm premature rupture of membranes and surgical site infection following cesarean section. Gynecol Obstet Reprod Med 2016; 22(3):139-143
  11. ACOG Practice Bulletin No.120: Use of prophylactic antibiotics in labor and delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117(6):1472-83
  12. Schneid-Kofman N, Sheiner E, Levy A, Holcberg G. Risk factors for wound infection following cesarean deliveries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2005 Jul;90(1):10-5
  13. Witter FR, Lawson P, Ferrell J. Decreasing cesarean section surgical site: An ongoing comprehensive quality improvement program. Am J Infect Control 2014 Apr; 42(4): 429-31
  14. Fitzwater JL, Tita A