SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2018 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3

Anterior uterine wall: normal and abnormal CT and MRI findings after cesarean section

ALİ DEVRİM KARAOSMANOĞLU
Altan GÜNEŞ
MUSTAFA NASUH ÖZMEN
DENİZ AKATA
Pages
135–138
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Acquaintance with the normal and abnormal findings of the anterior uterine wall is of critical importance for imagers in this era of ever increasing cesarean sections performed worldwide.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Cesarean section is the most commonly performed surgical procedure in women.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The surgical incision line in the uterus is generally located in the lower segment of the anterior uterine wall.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Acquaintance with the normal and abnormal findings of the anterior uterine wall is of critical importance for imagers in this era of ever increasing cesarean sections performed worldwide.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Cesarean section is the most commonly performed surgical procedure in women. The surgical incision line in the uterus is generally located in the lower segment of the anterior uterine wall. Acquaintance with the normal and abnormal findings of the anterior uterine wall is of critical importance for imagers in this era of ever increasing cesarean sections performed worldwide.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAOSMANOĞLU, A. D., GÜNEŞ, A., ÖZMEN, M. N., AKATA, D. (2018). Anterior uterine wall: normal and abnormal CT and MRI findings after cesarean section. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3, 135–138. https://ajindex.com/articles/162469

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Osser OV, Jokubkiene L, Valentin L. High prevalence of defects in Cesarean section scars at transvaginal ultrasound examination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 34:90–97. [CrossRef] Jacobson MT, Osias J, Velasco A, Charles R, Nezhat C. Laparoscopic repair of a uteroperitoneal fistula. JSLS 2003; 7:367–369.
  2. Wang CB, Chiu WW, Lee CY, Sun YL, Lin YH, Tseng CJ. Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 34:85–89. [CrossRef] Thubert T, Denoiseux C, Faivre E, Naveau A, Trichot C, Deffieux X. Combined conservative surgical and medical treatment of a uterocutaneous fistula. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2012; 19:244–247. [CrossRef] Murphy JM, Lee G, Sharma SD, Doble A, Lomas DJ. Vesicouterine fistula: MRI diagnosis. Eur Radiol 1999; 9:1876–1878. [CrossRef] Park OR, Kim TS, Kim HJ. Sonographic diagnosis of vesicouterine fistula. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 22:82-84. [CrossRef] Yu NC, Raman SS, Patel M, Barbaric Z. Fistulas of the genitourinary tract: a radiologic review. Radiographics 2004; 24:1331–1352. [CrossRef] Maldjian C, Adam R, Maldjian J, Smith R. MRI appearance of the pelvis in the post cesarean-section patient. Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 17:223–227. [CrossRef] Hiller N, Schor-Bardach R, Gileles-Hillel A, Stroumsa D, Simanovsky N. CT appearance of the pelvis after Cesarean delivery--what is considered normal? Clin Imaging 2013; 37:514–519. [CrossRef] Gui B, Danza FM, Valentini AL, et al. Multidetector CT appearance of the pelvis after cesarean delivery: normal and abnormal acute findings. Diagn Interv Radiol 2016; 22:534–541. [CrossRef] Gyamfi C, Juhasz G, Gyamfi P, Blumenfeld Y, Stone JL. Single- versus double-layer uterine incision closure and uterine rupture. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2006; 19:639–643. [CrossRef] Rodgers SK, Kirby CL, Smith RJ, Horrow MM. Imaging after cesarean delivery: acute and chronic complications. Radiographics 2012; 32:1693–1712. [CrossRef] Dresang LT, Leeman L. Cesarean delivery. Prim Care 2012; 39:145–165. [CrossRef] Betran AP, Merialdi M, Lauer JA, et al. Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2007; 21:98–113. [CrossRef] Todman D. A history of caesarean section: from ancient world to the modern era. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2007; 47:357–361. [CrossRef]