SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler ve Sanat Araştırmaları / 2024 / Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1

AN EVALUATION ON THE MEANING AND EXPRESSION OF ART HISTORY IN THE CONTEXT OF VISUAL LITERACY IN MUSEUMS

Yaşar Özrili0000-0003-4495-0705
Pages
108–123
Publication Date
2024-10-13
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the study, it develops suggestions on how museums can use visual literacy skills to explain art history more effectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Visual literacy is becoming increasingly important in today's world.
📊
Key Findings & Data:By making sense of these materials, visual literates can better understand the world.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the study, it develops suggestions on how museums can use visual literacy skills to explain art history more effectively.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Visual Literacy · Art History · Museum

Abstract

Visual literacy is becoming increasingly important in today's world. Visual materials are used in every aspect of our daily lives. By making sense of these materials, visual literates can better understand the world. Visual literates can also use visual materials to express their ideas and messages effectively. Visual literacy is the ability to understand and interpret visual materials. Visual materials can take a wide variety of forms, such as photographs, drawings, graphics, films and television programmes. Visual literates can evaluate the content, purpose, message and construction of visual materials. The aim of this study is to analyse museum participants' knowledge of the concept of visual literacy as well as their ability to understand newly introduced visual literacy concepts in relation to the science of art history. The main purpose of this study, which was carried out with document analysis and scanning method, is to answer the question of how art history is interpreted and explained in the context of visual literacy in museums. The study examines how museums can help their visitors make sense of and explain works of art. As a result of the study, it develops suggestions on how museums can use visual literacy skills to explain art history more effectively.

Özet

Visual literacy is becoming increasingly important in today's world. Visual materials are used in every aspect of our daily lives. By making sense of these materials, visual literates can better understand the world. Visual literates can also use visual materials to express their ideas and messages effectively. Visual literacy is the ability to understand and interpret visual materials. Visual materials can take a wide variety of forms, such as photographs, drawings, graphics, films and television programmes. Visual literates can evaluate the content, purpose, message and construction of visual materials. The aim of this study is to analyse museum participants' knowledge of the concept of visual literacy as well as their ability to understand newly introduced visual literacy concepts in relation to the science of art history. The main purpose of this study, which was carried out with document analysis and scanning method, is to answer the question of how art history is interpreted and explained in the context of visual literacy in museums. The study examines how museums can help their visitors make sense of and explain works of art. As a result of the study, it develops suggestions on how museums can use visual literacy skills to explain art history more effectively.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özrili, Y. (2024). AN EVALUATION ON THE MEANING AND EXPRESSION OF ART HISTORY IN THE CONTEXT OF VISUAL LITERACY IN MUSEUMS. Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler ve Sanat Araştırmaları, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 108–123. https://ajindex.com/articles/1623606

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (39)

  1. Allen, G. (2000). Intertextuality (New CriƟ cal Idiom Series). Routledge.
  2. Antoniadou, A. (2014). Performance Art as Intervention in Everyday Life: Participation, the Public Sphere and the Production of Meaning. In Seenography: Essays on the Meaning of Visuality in
  3. Performance Events (pp. 159-176). Brill.
  4. Ausburn, L.J., & F. B. Ausburn (1978). Visual Literacy: Background theory and practice. Programmed Learning And Educational Technology.
  5. Atasoy, S. (1999). Reflections from museology (1th. ed.). Anka Publications.
  6. Berger, J. (2002). Ways of seeing. Metis Publications.
  7. Bozdik, N. (2019). Visual arts teacher candidates visual literacy skills ınvestigation. (Publication No: 551359). [Master's Thesis, Adana Çukurova University Institute of Social Sciences]. ProQuest
  8. Dissertations & Theses Global.
  9. Burmark, L. (2002). Visual literacy: Learn to see, see to learn. supervision and curriculum development association,1703 N. Beauregard St.
  10. Buyurgan, S. (2017). How can we realize an efficient museum visit? Journal of National Education 46 (214 ), 317-343.
  11. Cameron, D. (1982). Museum and public access: The glenbow approach. The International of Museum management and Curatorship.
  12. Chang, S. K. (1986). Visual languages: A tutorial and survey. In Interdisciplinary Workshop on Informatics and Psychology (pp. 1-23). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  13. Chapman, H. (1992). ÉA world of ımages. Davis Pub. Inc.
  14. Çakıroğlu, E. (2016). The importance of basic design education in the development of visual literacy, International Journal of Social Research, 9 (44 ), 897- 906.
  15. Debes, J. (1968). Some Foundations Of Visual Literacy, Audio Visual Instruction, 13, 961-964.
  16. Deary, I. J., Simonotto, E., Meyer, M., Marshall, A., Marshall, I., Goddard, N., & Wardlaw, J. M., (2004). The functional anatomy of inspection time: An eventrelated fMRI study. NeuroImage 22, 1466-1479.
  17. Efland, A.D (1990). History of art education. Teachers College Press.
  18. Fransecky, R. B., & Debes. J. L. (1972). Visual literacy: A way to learn - a way to ıeach. AECT Publications, Association for Educational Communication and Technology.
  19. Gemalmayan, Y. R. (2012). The child's ımagination and the Importance of visual language. 3rd national children and youth literature symposium book. Ankara University Press House.
  20. Girgin, F. (2013). Space as the material of art in contemporary art. Akdeniz Sanat, 6 (11), 214-234.
  21. Göçer, A., & Tabak, G. (2013). Pre-service teachers' perceptions about visual literacy, Adıyaman University Journal of Institute of Social Sciences Special Issue on Turkish Language Teaching, 6(11), 517- 541.
  22. Göğebakan, Y., & Buyurgan, S. (2013). Associating visual arts and social studies courses in terms of realizing students' achievements related to recognizing and protecting cultural assets. Fırat University Journal of Social Sciences, 23(1), 191-205.
  23. Heinich, R., Molenda, M., & Russel, J.D. (1989). Instructional media and newt echnologies of instruction.(Third Edition). Macmillan Publishing Company.
  24. Hortin, J. A. (1980). Visual literacy and visual thinking. Erıc
  25. İşler, A. Ş. (2002). Visual literacy and visual literacy education today. Uludağ University, Journal of Faculty of Education, 15 ( I), 153-161.
  26. Kanama, R. (2005). Visual literacy in higher education. Journal of Educause Learning Initiative 1 (1), 1-11.
  27. Karaçam, E. (2020). Determination of the relationship between visual literacy level and critical thinking levels of students in secondary education institutions (Siverek district sample of Şanlıurfa province). (Publication No: 639990). [Master's thesis, Afyon Kocatepe University, Institute of Social Sciences]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
  28. Lopatovska, I., & Volpe, A. (2017). Developing visual literacy programming for very young children. Pratt İnstitue.
  29. Nelson, R. S., & Shiff, R. (Eds.). (2010). Critical terms for art history. University of Chicago Press.
  30. Öncü, Y. (2017). On visual literacy. Marmara Journal of Communication. (19), 64-77.
  31. Parsa, A. F. (2007). Visual literacy, http://www.fotografya. gen.tr/cnd/index.php?id=248,0,0,0,1,0,0
  32. Rice, D. (1989). Museums and visual literacy. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 23(4), 95-99.
  33. San, İ. (1985). Art and education. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Publications.
  34. Sanalan, V. A., & Sülün, A. T., Çoban, A. (2007). Vısual lıteracy, Journal of Erzincan Faculty of Education, 9 (2 ), 35-49.
  35. Sutton, R.E. (1993). Visual literacy, creativity and the teaching of argument, learning disabilities: A Contemporary Journal 15(1), 67-84.
  36. Stokes, S. (2002). Visual literacy in teaching and learning: A literary perspective. Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology into Education, 1 (1), 10-19.
  37. Yuldosheva, L. T. (2022). Implementatıon of visual literacy in a museum usıng the new models of pedagogue. Academic Research in Educational Sciences, 3(1), 686-690.
  38. Yenawine, P. (1997). Thoughts on visual literacy. VTS. Handbook of Research on Teaching Literacy through the Communicative and Visual Arts.
  39. Yücel, E. ( 1999). Museology in Turkey. Archeology and Art Publications.