Journals / Bezmiâlem Science / 2015 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

Sezeryan Operasyonlarında Kullanılan Anestezi Yönteminin Retrospektif Olarak Değerlendirilmesi

Retrospective Evaluation of the Anaesthetic Method Used in Caesarean Sections

Pages
5–7
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Making the method of anaesthesia depend on patients’ preferences with the exception of some special conditions such as patients’ fear and anesthesiologist’s additional aliments might have a role in this circumstance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The goal of this study was to evaluate the anaesthetic method used in patients who have undergone caesarean section.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The anaesthetic reports that belong to the women who underwent caesarean section between the years 2014 and 2015 were evaluated in terms of the demographic data, anaesthetic methods, and reported complications.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Making the method of anaesthesia depend on patients’ preferences with the exception of some special conditions such as patients’ fear and anesthesiologist’s additional aliments might have a role in this circumstance.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The goal of this study was to evaluate the anaesthetic method used in patients who have undergone caesarean section. Methods: The anaesthetic reports that belong to the women who underwent caesarean section between the years 2014 and 2015 were evaluated in terms of the demographic data, anaesthetic methods, and reported complications. Results: Although 299 patients received general anaesthesia, 75 patients received regional anaesthesia during caesarean section. Mortality was not observed in any patient. Conclusion: Although regional anaesthesia is currently being used mostly in many countries for caesarean sections, our patients chose the general anaesthesia. Making the method of anaesthesia depend on patients’ preferences with the exception of some special conditions such as patients’ fear and anesthesiologist’s additional aliments might have a role in this circumstance.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı sezeryan ameliyatı olan hastalarda kullanılan anestezi yöntemlerini değerlendirmektir. Yöntemler: Retrospektif olarak 2014-2015 yılları arasında sezeryan operasyonu geçiren kadınların anestezi kartları demografik veriler, anestezi tipi ve olası komplikasyonlar açısından incelendi. Bulgular: Sezeryan operasyonu için 75 hastaya rejyonel anestezi yapılmasına karşılık 299 gebe genel anestezi altında anestezi almıştı. Hiçbir hastada mortaliteye rastlanmadı. Sonuç: Günümüzde çoğu ülkelerde sezeryan operasyonları için rejyonel anestezi daha çok kullanılmasına rağmen hastalarımızın seçimi genel anestezi yönünde olmuştur. Bunda hastaların korkusu ile anestezi doktorunun hastanın ek rahatsızlıkları gibi özel bir durum yoksa anestezi seçimini hasta tercihine bırakmasının rolü olabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAŞARANOĞLU, G., BAŞARANOĞLU, M. (2015). Sezeryan Operasyonlarında Kullanılan Anestezi Yönteminin Retrospektif Olarak Değerlendirilmesi. Bezmiâlem Science, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 5–7. https://ajindex.com/articles/162255

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Lai HY, Tsai PS, Fan YC, Huang CJ. Anesthetic practice for Caesarean section and factors influencing anesthesiologists’ choice of anesthesia: a population-based study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2014; 58: 843-50. [CrossRef] 2. Jenkins JG, Khan MM. Anaesthesia for Caesarean section: a survey in a UK region from 1992 to 2002. Anaesthesia 2003; 58: 1114-8. [CrossRef] 3. Başaranoglu G, Idin K, Batmaz G, Topuz U, Uysal H, Salihoglu Z. The attitudes and behaviors of pregnanat women about labor anesthesia. Bezmialem Science 2014; 2: 65-70. [CrossRef] 4. Chen YH, Rau RH, Keller JJ, Lin HC. Possible effects of anaesthetic management on the 1 yr followed-up risk of herpes zoster after Caesarean deliveries. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108: 278-82. [CrossRef] 5. Rukewe A, Fatiregun A, Adebayo K. Anaesthesia for caesarean deliveries and maternal complications in a Nigerian teaching hospital. Afr J Med Med Sci 2014; 43: 5-10. 6. MBRRACE Mothers and Babies: Reducing Risk through Audits and Confidential Enquiries. Available at: https://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/downloads/files/mbrrace-uk/reports/Saving%20Lives%20Improving%20 Mothers%20Care%20report%202014%20Exec%20Summary.pdf. 7. Türkiye Ulusal Anne Ölümleri Çalışması 2005. Available at: http:// www.hips.hacettepe.edu.tr/uaop_ankara/ozet_rapor.pdf 8. Fassoulaki A, Staikou C, Melemeni A, Kottis G, Petropoulos G. Anaesthesia preference, neuraxial vs general, and outcome after caesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol 2010; 30: 818-21. [CrossRef] 9. Ahmad I, Afshan G. Knowledge and attitudes of Pakistani women towards anaesthesia techniques for caesarean section. J Pak Med Assoc 2011; 61: 359-62. 10. Kocamanoğlu IS, Sarihasan B, Şener B, Tur A, Şahinoğlu H, Sunter T. Methods and complications of anesthesia in cesarean/section operations: retrospective evaluations of 3552 cases. Turkiye klinikleri j med sci 2005; 25: 810-6.