SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Siirt Eğitim Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2

Analysis of Postgraduate Studies Prepared in the Field of Education on Cyberloafing: A Meta-Synthesis Study

Erol Koçoğlu(İnönü Üniversitesi)0000-0003-4595-2892
Ramazan Biçer(İnönü Üniversitesi)0000-0002-1349-6602
Pages
77–104
Publication Date
2025-12-26
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study concluded with recommendations for researchers, teachers, and students.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to analyze postgraduate studies on cyberloafing in Turkey, conducted in the field of education, using the meta-synthesis method.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study data was obtained by scanning the database of the Council of Higher Education (YÖK) National Thesis Center for key concepts related to "cyberloafing." The searches yielded 30 postgraduate studies on the subject.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study concluded with recommendations for researchers, teachers, and students.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2021 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Digitalization · cyberloafing · education

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze postgraduate studies on cyberloafing in Turkey, conducted in the field of education, using the meta-synthesis method. The study was designed using content analysis based on the meta-synthesis method, a qualitative research design. The study data was obtained by scanning the database of the Council of Higher Education (YÖK) National Thesis Center for key concepts related to "cyberloafing." The searches yielded 30 postgraduate studies on the subject. According to the findings, 2021 stands out in terms of the distribution of theses by year. Master's theses constitute the majority of theses by type. Studies on cyberloafing conducted with students from different levels are noteworthy in terms of the distribution of topics. Trakya University has the highest number of studies among universities. Quantitative methods and survey designs are prominent in terms of the methods used. In terms of participants and study groups, a general majority of teachers were found. Surveys and scales were frequently used as data collection tools. Data analysis included descriptive analysis, t-tests, and the use of different variables. The research results yielded diverse findings due to the diversity of variables. The study concluded with recommendations for researchers, teachers, and students.

Özet

This study aimed to analyze postgraduate studies on cyberloafing in Turkey, conducted in the field of education, using the meta-synthesis method. The study was designed using content analysis based on the meta-synthesis method, a qualitative research design. The study data was obtained by scanning the database of the Council of Higher Education (YÖK) National Thesis Center for key concepts related to "cyberloafing." The searches yielded 30 postgraduate studies on the subject. According to the findings, 2021 stands out in terms of the distribution of theses by year. Master's theses constitute the majority of theses by type. Studies on cyberloafing conducted with students from different levels are noteworthy in terms of the distribution of topics. Trakya University has the highest number of studies among universities. Quantitative methods and survey designs are prominent in terms of the methods used. In terms of participants and study groups, a general majority of teachers were found. Surveys and scales were frequently used as data collection tools. Data analysis included descriptive analysis, t-tests, and the use of different variables. The research results yielded diverse findings due to the diversity of variables. The study concluded with recommendations for researchers, teachers, and students.

🔖

Cite This Article

Koçoğlu, E., Biçer, R. (2025). Analysis of Postgraduate Studies Prepared in the Field of Education on Cyberloafing: A Meta-Synthesis Study. Siirt Eğitim Dergisi, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 77–104. https://doi.org/10.58667/sedder.1761203

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (65)

  1. Agrawal, S., & Krishna, S. M. (2025). Breaking the Cycle: How Fatigue, Cyberloafing, and Self-Regulation Influence Learning Satisfaction in Online Learning. Education Sciences, 15(3), Article 373. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030373
  2. Akar, I. ve Coşkun, B. K. (2020). Öğretmen adaylarının yaratıcılıkları ile siber aylaklıkları arasındaki ilişkinin araştırılması. Düşünme Becerileri ve Yaratıcılık, 38, 100724.
  3. Akgün, F. (2020). Investigation of High School Students' Cyberloafing Behaviors in Classes. Education & Science/Egitim ve Bilim, 45(201).
  4. Akyol, C. & Dikicigil, Ö. (2024). Dijitalleşme sürecine bağlı ortaya çıkan davranışsal bozuklukların sosyal bilgiler eğitimi bağlamında değerlendirilmesi (Ed. E. Koçoğlu & Ş. Egüz). Modüler Bağlamda Sosyal Bilgiler (Dijitalleşme Temelli Bakış) Cilt IV (1. Baskı, s. 287-320) içinde. Pegem Akademi.
  5. Alanoglu, M., & Karabatak, S. (2021). Examining of the Smartphone Cyberloafing in the Class: Relationship with the Attitude towards Learning and Prevention of Cyberloafing. International Journal of Technology in Education, 4(3), 351-372.
  6. Alyahya, S. & Alqahtani, A. (2022). Cyberloafing in Educational Settings: A Systematic." iJIM 16.16: 113.
  7. Arabaci, I. B. (2017). Investigation Faculty of Education Students' Cyberloafing Behaviors in Terms of Various Variables. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 16(1), 72-82.
  8. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  9. Beri, N., & Gulati, S. (2022). Cyberloafing as a challenge for integration of ICT in education. Journal of Image Processing and Intelligent Remote Sensing (JIPIRS), 2(1), 14-19.
  10. Bibi, A., Mushtaq, A., Aurangzeb, W., Ahmed, S. Z., & Ahmad, M. (2025). Role of self-regulation in controlling cyber loafing and smartphone addiction: Reducing health risk at the university level. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 14(1), 125.
  11. Blanchard, A. L., & Henle, C. A. (2008). Correlates of different forms of cyberloafing: The role of norms and external locus of control. Computers in human behavior, 24(3), 1067-1084.
  12. Bygstad, B., Øvrelid, E., Ludvigsen, S., & Dæhlen, M. (2022). From dual digitalization to digital learning space: Exploring the digital transformation of higher education. Computers & Education, 182, 104463.
  13. Candan, H., & İnce, M. (2016). Siber kaytarma ve örgütsel bağlılık arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesine yönelik emniyet çalışanları üzerine bir araştırma. Niğde Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(1), 229-235.
  14. Çalık, M., & Sözbilir, M. (2014). İçerik analizinin parametreleri. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(174).
  15. Çınar, O., & Cinisli, Z. (2018). In-class cyberloafing among undergraduate students of physical education and sports teaching department. Journal of Physical Education and Sports Studies (JPESS), 10(1), 39-48.
  16. Çok, R., & Kutlu, M. (2018). Üniversite Öğrencilerin Ders Esnasında Ders Dışı İnternet Kullanım Davranışları ile Akademik Güdülenme Düzeylerinin Çeşitli Değişkenlere Göre İncelenmesi. The Journal of International Lingual Social and Educational Sciences, 4(1), 1-21.
  17. Demirbilek, N., & Atila, F. (2021). Üniversite öğrencilerinin perspektifinden sanal kaytarma kavramı. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (38), 196-222.
  18. Dündar, R., & Biçer, R. (2024). Sosyal Bilgiler Lisansüstü Öğrencilerinin Gelişmeleri Kaçırma Korkusu (FoMO) Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesi: Bir Durum Çalışması. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (70), 187-210.
  19. Fuadi, M. N., Pradana, R. G., Budiman, M., Fauziyah, F., Medina, K. N., Ramadhan, S.,. & Widhiarso, W. (2025). Modification of the Indonesian Academic Cyberloafing Scale (IACS): A tool for assessing online deviance in educational contexts. Humanitas: Indonesian Psychological Journal, 45-56.
  20. Gencer, T. E. ve Aktan, M. C. (2021). Dijitalleşen çağda ve toplumda değişen ihtiyaçlar ve sorunlar: esosyal hizmet (sosyal hizmet 2.0) gereksinimi. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet, 32(3), 1143-1175. DOI: 10.33417/tsh.875908.
  21. Goyal, U., & Sachdeva, G. (2025). Unveiling digital temptations in modern workspaces: a PRISMA-guided investigation on cyberloafing. International Journal of Organizational Analysis.
  22. Guo, Y., Song, Y. & Guo, J. (2025). The curvilinear relationship between cyberloafing and academic performance among college students: an empirical evidence from China. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13499-4
  23. Harwood, T. G., & Garry, T. (2003). An overview of content analysis. The marketing review, 3(4), 479-498. Heidari, E., Moghaddam, A., & Salimi, G. (2023). Cyberloafing in academia: a sequential exploration into students’ perceptions. Education and Information Technologies, 28(7), 8113-8133.
  24. İşgüzar, S., & Ayden, C. (2017, September). Siber aylaklık üzerine değerlendirmeler: toplu bir bakış. In 4th International Regional Development Conference.
  25. Karabıyık, C., Baturay, M. H. & Özdemir, M. (2021). Intention as a mediator between attitudes, subjective norms, and cyberloafing among preservice teachers of English. Participatory Educational Research, 8(2), 57-73.
  26. Karademir Coskun, T. & Gokcearslan, S. (2019). Examination of Cyberloafing Studies in Education: A Content Analysis. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 11(1), 94-103.
  27. Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G., Yılmaz, R., Öztürk, H. T., Sezer, B., & Karademir, T. (2015). Cyberloafing as a barrier to the successful integration of information and communication technologies into teaching and learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 290-298.
  28. Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G., Yılmaz, R., & Sulak, S. (2024). Cyberloafing in the Online Synchronous Lessons: Exploring Variables Associated with University Students’ Cyberloafing Behaviors. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29(2), 681-696.
  29. Koay, K. Y. (2018). Assessing Cyberloafing Behaviour Among University Students: A Validation of the Cyberloafing Scale. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 26(1).
  30. Koay, K. Y., & Soh, P. C. H. (2019). Does cyberloafing really harm employees’ work performance?: an overview. In International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management (pp. 901-912). Springer, Cham.
  31. Koçoğlu, E. (2023). Eğitimde dijital obezite. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  32. Koçoğlu, E. & Biçer, R. (2024). Sanal kaytarma ve dijital öyküleme kavramlarının sosyal bilgiler eğitimi bağlamında değerlendirilmesi. E. Koçoğlu ve Ş. Egüz (Ed.). Modüler Bağlamda Sosyal Bilgiler (Dijitalleşme Temelli Bakış) Cilt IV (1. Baskı, s. 343-365) içinde. Pegem Akademi.
  33. Koçoğlu, E., Biçer, R., & Yiğen, V. (2022). Metaphorical Connotations of Preservice Teachers on the Concept of Nomophobia. Education Quarterly Reviews, 5(4).
  34. Kumar, S., Akhouri, A., Yadav, R., & Chauhan, V. (2025). A comprehensive bibliometric study of cyberloafing: trends, patterns and future directions. International Journal of Organizational Analysis.
  35. Kurşunmaden, F. İ. (2024). Sanal kaytarma kavramına teorik bir bakış. Academıc Socıal Resources Journal, 7(37), 562-567.
  36. Levkov, N., & Kitanovikj, B. (2024). How Cyberloafing Affects Students' Cognitive Engagement and Psychological Detachment in Higher Education Classes?. International Journal of Technology in Education, 7(4), 870-882.
  37. Lim, V. K. (2002). The IT way of loafing on the job: Cyberloafing, neutralizing and organizational justice. Journal of organizational behavior: the international journal of industrial, occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 23(5), 675-694.
  38. Lim, V. K. & Teo, T. S. (2024). Cyberloafing: A review and research agenda. Applied Psychology, 73(1), 441-484.
  39. Magnani, M. (2022). The technological revolution: The rise of machines. In Making the global economy work for everyone: Lessons of sustainability from the tech revolution and the pandemic (pp. 17-52). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  40. Malik, N. (2023). Performance Of Accounting Teachers And Education Staff: The Role Of Cyberloafing And Work Stress. Jurnal Akademi Akuntansi, 6(1), 35-43.
  41. Martin, F., Long, S., Haywood, K., & Xie, K. (2025). Digital distractions in education: a systematic review of research on causes, consequences and prevention strategies. Educational technology research and development, 1-29.
  42. Masadeh, T. S. Y. (2021). Prevalence of nomophobia and cyberloafing behaviors among undergraduate students. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(2).
  43. Mashiane, T., & Kritzinger, E. (2021). Identifying behavioral constructs in relation to user cybersecurity behavior. Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences, 9(2), 98-122.
  44. Mercado, B. K., Giordano, C., & Dilchert, S. (2017). A meta-analytic investigation of cyberloafing. Career Development International, 22(5), 546-564.
  45. Merriam, S. B. (2018). Nitel Araştırma Desen ve Uygulama İçin Bir Rehber (3. Basımdan Çeviri). S. Turan (Çev. Ed.). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  46. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. (1994). M.(1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 338.
  47. Ngowella, G. D., Loua, L. R., & Suharnomo, S. (2022). A review on cyberloafing: The effects of social platforms on work performance. Asia Pacific Fraud Journal, 7(1), 27-39.
  48. Nikitenko, V. (2019). The impact of digitalization on value orientations changes in the modern digital society. Humanities studies, (2 (79)), 80-94.
  49. Ozdemir, C., & Åžahan, S. (2021). Cyberloafing behaviors of health professional students during distance education in the COVID-19 pandemic period. Journal of Health Education, 6(1), 1-6.
  50. Örücü, E. & Yıldız, H. (2014). İşyerinde Kişisel İnternet ve Teknoloji Kullanımı: Sanal Kaytarma. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 14, Sayı:1.
  51. Patton, M. Q. (2014). Nitel araştırma ve değerlendirme yöntemleri. (Çev. Ed. M. Bütün & S. Beşir Demir). (1. Basım). Pegem Akademi.
  52. Pektaş, Ç. ve Aydın, S. (2022). Sanal Kaytarma Konusunda Hazırlanan Lisansüstü Tezlerin Bibliyometrik Profili. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Sayı 48, Denizli, ss. 89-108.
  53. Polat, S., & Ay, O. (2016). Meta-sentez: Kavramsal bir çözümleme. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4(2), 52-64. Prasad, S., Lim, Vivien K.G. and Chen, Don J.Q. (2010). Self-Regulation, Individual Characteristics and Cyberloafing. PACIS 2010 Proceedings. 159. https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2010/159
  54. Saleh, M., Daqqa, I., AbdulRahim, M. B., & Sakallah, N. (2018). The effect of cyberloafing on employee productivity. International journal of advanced and applied sciences, 5(4), 87-92.
  55. Samsudin, S. N, Nasir, N. S. M., & Hassan, M. S. (2025). Understanding Cyberloafing: A Systematic Literature Review of Workplace Antecedents and Behavioural Theories. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, Volume 8. DOI: 10.47191/ijsshr/v8-i5-62.
  56. Saritepeci, M. (2020). Predictors of cyberloafing among high school students: unauthorized access to school network, metacognitive awareness and smartphone addiction. Education and Information Technologies, 25(3), 2201-2219.
  57. Shahzadi, K., & Khurram, S. (2022). Determinants of employees’ cyberloafing behaviour: A systematic literature review. Journal of Development and Social Sciences, 3(3), 150-161.
  58. Şahin, Y. L., Sarsar, F., Sapmaz, F., & Hamutoğlu, N. B. (2022). The examination of self-regulation abilities in high school students within the framework of an integrated model of personality traits, cyberloafing and nomophobia. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 51(1), 501-537.
  59. Talan, T., Doğan, Y., and Kalinkara, Y. (2023). Relationships between Smartphone Addiction, Academic Performance, Life Satisfaction, Hopelessness and Cyberloafing among University Undergraduate Students. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 19(4), 24-36. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.19.4.19429
  60. Tandon, A., Kaur, P., Ruparel, N., Islam, J. U., & Dhir, A. (2022). Cyberloafing and cyberslacking in the workplace: systematic literature review of past achievements and future promises. Internet Research, 32(1), 55-89.
  61. Uslu, O. (2025). Exploring the link between cyberloafing and work-related factors: A decade of systematic analysis. Technology in Society, 83, 102997.
  62. Varol, F., & Yıldırım, E. (2019). Cyberloafing in higher education: Reasons and suggestions from students’ perspectives. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 24, 129-142.
  63. Wu, J., Mei, W., & Ugrin, J. C. (2018). Student cyberloafing in and out of the classroom in China and the relationship with student performance. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(3), 199-204.
  64. Yaşar, S., & Yurdugül, H. (2013). The investigation of relation between cyberloafing activities and cyberloafing behaviors in higher education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 600-604.
  65. Fuadi, M. N., Pradana, R. G., Budiman, M., Fauziyah, F., Medina, K. N., Ramadhan, S.,. & Widhiarso, W. (2025). Modification of the Indonesian Academic Cyberloafing Scale (IACS): A tool for assessing online deviance in educational contexts. Humanitas: Indonesian Psychological Journal, 45-56.