SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2

Cost Analysis of Membrane Capacitive Deionization and Comparison of Treatment Costs of Desalination Processes

Halil İbrahim Uzun(MUŞ ALPARSLAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6158-743X
Pages
82–88
Publication Date
2022-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, the cost analysis of the MCDI process in desalination from the water will be made by comparing the treatment costs of desalination processes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Today, one of the most critical issues is the supply of drinking and utility water, which is the most basic need for human beings to be healthy, reliable, and economical.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With social and economic growth, increased living standards also raise the drinking and utility water requirements per capita.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, the cost analysis of the MCDI process in desalination from the water will be made by comparing the treatment costs of desalination processes.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Desalination · cost analysis · membrane capacitive deionization

Abstract

Today, one of the most critical issues is the supply of drinking and utility water, which is the most basic need for human beings to be healthy, reliable, and economical. With social and economic growth, increased living standards also raise the drinking and utility water requirements per capita. On the other hand, the total amount of water in the world is 1.4 million km3, 97.5% of which is salt water in the oceans. Only 0.5% of the remaining water is available, and more than 90% is located at the poles and underground. For this reason, desalination processes are of great importance. However, the most significant handicap in desalination processes is that they are not economically sustainable. The membrane capacitive deionization Process is an effective method to remove ions from water. It has advantages such as low cost, flexible use, and low secondary pollution. In this study, the cost analysis of the MCDI process in desalination from the water will be made by comparing the treatment costs of desalination processes.

Özet

Today, one of the most critical issues is the supply of drinking and utility water, which is the most basic need for human beings to be healthy, reliable, and economical. With social and economic growth, increased living standards also raise the drinking and utility water requirements per capita. On the other hand, the total amount of water in the world is 1.4 million km3, 97.5% of which is salt water in the oceans. Only 0.5% of the remaining water is available, and more than 90% is located at the poles and underground. For this reason, desalination processes are of great importance. However, the most significant handicap in desalination processes is that they are not economically sustainable. The membrane capacitive deionization Process is an effective method to remove ions from water. It has advantages such as low cost, flexible use, and low secondary pollution. In this study, the cost analysis of the MCDI process in desalination from the water will be made by comparing the treatment costs of desalination processes.

🔖

Cite This Article

Uzun, H. İ. (2022). Cost Analysis of Membrane Capacitive Deionization and Comparison of Treatment Costs of Desalination Processes. Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Mühendislik Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 82–88. https://ajindex.com/articles/1620005

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Freeze, R.A., Cherry, J.A., Cherry, Groundwater, 1979.
  2. Delgado, C., Pacheco, J., Cabrera, A., Batllori, E., Orellana, R., Bautista, F., Quality of groundwater for irrigation in tropical karst environment: The case of Yucatán, Mexico, Agric. Water Manag. 97; 1423–1433, 2010.
  3. Natarajan, V.A., Tamizhazhagan, V., Tangudu, N., & Kumar, M.S., Analysis of Groundwater Level Fluctuations and its Association with Rainfall Using Statistical Methods. Journal Of Algebraic Statistics, 13(3), p. 1895-1904, 2022.
  4. Sargın, A.H., Yeraltı Suları, Devlet Su İşleri (DSİ) Genel Müdürlüğü Jeoteknik Hizmetler ve Yeraltı suları Dairesi Başkanlığı, 2010.
  5. Uzun, H.İ., Membran Kapasitif Deiyonizasyon Prosesi ile Yerlatı Sularının Arıtılması ve Arıtma Ekonomisi, in: A. Eker, F.İ. Türkdoğan, F.G. İskender, N. Tüfekçi, S. Övez (Eds.), Çevre - Bilim ve Teknol., Güven Plus Grup A.Ş. Yayınları, İstanbul, p. 660, 2019.
  6. Edmunds, W.M., Smedley, P.L., Groundwater geochemistry and health: an overview. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 113(1), p. 91-105, 1996.
  7. Uzun, H.I., Debik, E., Economical approach to nitrate removal via membrane capacitive deionization, Sep. Purif. Technol. 209; 776–781, 2019.
  8. Uzun, H.İ., Debik, E., Economic evaluation of fluoride removal by membrane capacitive deionization. Environmental Research and Technology, 4(4), p. 352-357, 2021.
  9. Uzun, H.İ., Yeraltı Sularından Membran Kapasitif Deiyonizasyon Yöntemi ile Arsenik ve Bor Giderimi, Yildiz Technical University, 2018.
  10. Uzun, H.I., Debik, E., Yeraltı Sularından Membran Kapasitif Deiyonizasyon Yöntemi ile Florür Giderimine Ekonomik Yaklaşım, in: 5th Int. Symp. Environ. Morals Proc. B.,: pp. 400–409, 2020.
  11. Uzun, H.İ., Debik. E., Sulfate Removal by Capacitive Deionization (CDI) Process and Cost Analysis, in: B. Mahjoub, M.E. Aydin (Eds.), Water Perspect. Emerg. Countries, Water Scarcity Risks and Solut., DAAD, Sousse, Tunisia, pp. 115–123, 2018.
  12. Uzun, H.İ., Membran Kapasitif Deiyonizasyon Prosesi ile Yerlatı Sularının Arıtılması ve Arıtma Ekonomisi, in: A. Eker, F.İ. Türkdoğan, F.G. İskender, N. Tüfekçi, S. Övez (Eds.), Çevre - Bilim ve Teknol., Güven Plus Grup A.Ş. Yayınları, İstanbul, p. 660, 2019.