SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Journal of Metaverse / 2026 / Issue: 6

The Web3.0 Economic System: Structure, Model, and Applications

Yiming Guo0000-0002-4266-3123
Jianming Zhu0009-0004-7693-2389
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-01-08
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It concludes by outlining policy and research pathways toward the sustainable and inclusive evolution of Web3.0 ecosystems.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Web2.0 significantly expanded online user participation through centralized platforms but also led to issues such as data monopolies and privacy concerns.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In contrast, Web3.0 introduces a decentralized paradigm based on blockchain, smart contracts, and distributed ledgers, aiming to reconstruct the institutional foundations of the digital economy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It concludes by outlining policy and research pathways toward the sustainable and inclusive evolution of Web3.0 ecosystems.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Web3.0 · Blockchain · Value Distribution

Abstract

Web2.0 significantly expanded online user participation through centralized platforms but also led to issues such as data monopolies and privacy concerns. In contrast, Web3.0 introduces a decentralized paradigm based on blockchain, smart contracts, and distributed ledgers, aiming to reconstruct the institutional foundations of the digital economy. However, existing research remains fragmented, often focusing on technological or governance aspects without offering a cohesive framework to interpret Web3.0 as an integrated economic system. This study proposes a three-layer conceptual model, comprising the system, operation, and application layers, to provide a unified framework for understanding Web3.0’s economic architecture. The model links technological infrastructure, incentive governance, and value realization mechanisms, drawing upon systems theory, institutional economics, and socio-technical systems theory to explain how decentralized infrastructures, token-based incentives, and application ecosystems interact and evolve. Through a systematic literature review, the study identifies key mechanisms shaping value circulation, token governance, and institutional adaptation in decentralized economies, offering theoretical guidance for both research and regulation. It concludes by outlining policy and research pathways toward the sustainable and inclusive evolution of Web3.0 ecosystems.

🔖

Cite This Article

Guo, Y., Zhu, J. (2026). The Web3.0 Economic System: Structure, Model, and Applications. Journal of Metaverse, Issue: 6. https://doi.org/10.57019/jmv.1774834

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (61)

  1. Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power, edn. PublicAffairs, New York.
  2. Catalini, C., & Gans, J. S. (2020). Some simple economics of the blockchain. Communications of the ACM, 63(7), 80-90. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359552
  3. Davidson, S., De Filippi, P., & Potts, J. (2018). Blockchains and the economic institutions of capitalism. Journal of institutional economics, 14(4), 639-658. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137417000200
  4. Allen, D. W., Berg, C., Lane, A. M., MacDonald, T., & Potts, J. (2023). The exchange theory of web3 governance. Kyklos, 76(4), 659-675. https://doi.org/10.1111/kykl.12345
  5. McIntosh, D. (2019). We Need to Talk about Data: How Digital Monopolies Arise and Why They Have Power and Influence. Journal of Technology Law & Policy, 23(2), 185–213.
  6. Lassila, O., Hendler, J., & Berners-Lee, T. (2001). The semantic web. Scientific american, 284(5), 34-43.
  7. Wood G. (Apr 2014). Dapps: what Web 3.0 looks like. http://gavwood.com/dappsweb3.html
  8. Zou, M. (2020). Code, and other laws of blockchain. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 40(3), 645-665. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqaa018
  9. Werbach, K. (2018). Trust, but verify: Why the blockchain needs the law. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 33(2), 487-550. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38H41JM9N
  10. Gan, W., Ye, Z., Wan, S., & Yu, P. S. (2023, April). Web 3.0: The future of internet. In Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 (pp. 1266-1275). https://doi.org/10.1145/3543873.3587583
  11. Aramonte, S. Huang, W. & Schrimpf, A. (2021). DeFi risks and the decentralisation illusion. BIS Quarterly Review. https://www.bis.org/publ/qtrpdf/r_qt2112b.pdf
  12. Reimers, I., & Waldfogel, J. (2023). A framework for detection, measurement, and welfare analysis of platform bias. NBER Working Paper 3176. https://doi.org/10.3386/w31766
  13. Juan-Juan, L., Rui, Q., Wen-Wen, D., Ge, W., Tan, W., & Fei-Yue, W. (2023). A new framework for Web3-powered decentralized autonomous organizations and operations. Acta Automatica Sinica, 49(5), 985-998. https://doi.org/10.16383/j.aas.c220753
  14. Rikken, O., Janssen, M., & Kwee, Z. (2019). Governance challenges of blockchain and decentralized autonomous organizations. Information Polity, 24(4), 397-417. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-190154
  15. Lafarre, A., & Van der Elst, C. (2018). Blockchain technology for corporate governance and shareholder activism. European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI)-Law Working Paper, (390). https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3135209
  16. Feichtinger, R., Fritsch, R., Vonlanthen, Y., & Wattenhofer, R. (2023, May). The hidden shortcomings of (d) aos–an empirical study of on-chain governance. In International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security (pp. 165-185). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48806-1_11
  17. Han, J., Lee, J., & Li, T. (2025). A review of DAO governance: Recent literature and emerging trends. Journal of Corporate Finance, 102734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2025.102734
  18. Jiang, W., & Li, T. (2024). Corporate governance meets data and technology. Foundations and Trends® in Finance, 14(2), 61-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/0500000071
  19. OECD. (2024). The Limits of DeFi for Financial Inclusion: Lessons from ASEAN. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f00a0c7f-en.
  20. Auer, R., Lewrick, U., & Paulick, J. (2025). DeFiying gravity? An empirical analysis of cross-border Bitcoin, Ether and stablecoin flows (No. 1265). Bank for International Settlements. https://www.bis.org/publ/work1265.htm
  21. Financial Stability Board. (2023, July). FSB global regulatory framework for crypto-asset activities. 1-13. https://www.fsb.org/uploads/P170723-1.pdf
  22. Ahmed, R., Aldasoro, I., & Duley, C. (2024). Public information and stablecoin runs. Bank for International Settlements, Monetary and Economic Department. https://www.bis.org/publ/work1164.htm.
  23. Chalmers, D., Fisch, C., Matthews, R., Quinn, W., & Recker, J. (2022). Beyond the bubble: Will NFTs and digital proof of ownership empower creative industry entrepreneurs?. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 17, e00309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2022.e00309
  24. Liu, Y. (2023). The Generation Mechanism, Protection Scheme and System Construction of Algorithmic Consumers in the Digital Economy. Journal of Shenzhen University (Humanities & Social Sciences), 40(2),112-122.
  25. Wang, Y. & Zhang, Y. (2023). From platform economy to creator economy: a study on reconstruction path of digital content production system in the Web 3.0 era. Publishing Research, 39(4),31-36. https://doi.org/10.19393/j.cnki.cn11-1537/g2.2023.04.035
  26. Lai, Y., Yang, J., Liu, M., Li, Y., & Li, S. (2023). Web3: Exploring decentralized technologies and applications for the future of empowerment and ownership. Blockchains, 1(2), 111-131. https://doi.org/10.3390/blockchains1020008
  27. Xiong, Y., Jaiswal, A. K., Tang, T., Zuo, Q., Venables, O., & Lai, K. C. (2025). Web 3.0 Protocol-as-Platform: Vision and Framework for Decentralized Agentic Super Intelligence. Available at SSRN 5162502. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5162502
  28. Wu, H., Abdallah, M., Chi, Y., Lin, L., & Cai, W. (2025). Web3 Multimedia Applications: Under the Impact of Decentralization. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Applications, 21(7), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1145/3725851
  29. Rong, H. (2023). When URL Meets IRL in Web3: Lessons for Decentralized Trust-Building Technologies in Democratic Governance. Available at SSRN 5287325. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5287325.
  30. Tirole, J. (2023). Competition and the industrial challenge for the digital age. Annual Review of Economics, 15(1), 573-605. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-090622-024222
  31. Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). Research commentary—the new organizing logic of digital innovation: an agenda for information systems research. Information systems research, 21(4), 724-735. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0322
  32. Kohli, R., & Melville, N. P. (2019). Digital innovation: A review and synthesis. Information Systems Journal, 29(1), 200-223. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12193
  33. Gawer, A. (2021). Digital platforms’ boundaries: The interplay of firm scope, platform sides, and digital interfaces. Long range planning, 54(5), 102045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2020.102045
  34. Trist, E. L., & Bamforth, K. W. (1951). Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal-getting: An examination of the psychological situation and defences of a work group in relation to the social structure and technological content of the work system. Human relations, 4(1), 3-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675100400101
  35. Guan, C., Ding, D., Guo, J., & Teng, Y. (2023). An ecosystem approach to Web3. 0: a systematic review and research agenda. Journal of Electronic Business & Digital Economics, 2(1), 139-156. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEBDE-10-2022-0039
  36. Gan, H. (2023). Web 3.0/Metaverse theoretical framework: A preliminary research. Science & Technology Review, 41(15), 69-78. https://doi.org/10.3981/j.issn.1000-7857.2023.15.007
  37. Proelss, J., Sévigny, S., & Schweizer, D. (2023). GameFi: The perfect symbiosis of blockchain, tokens, DeFi, and NFTs?. International Review of Financial Analysis, 90, 102916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102916
  38. Khan, S. N., Loukil, F., Ghedira-Guegan, C., Benkhelifa, E., & Bani-Hani, A. (2021). Blockchain smart contracts: Applications, challenges, and future trends. Peer-to-peer Networking and Applications, 14(5), 2901-2925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-021-01127-0
  39. Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H. N., Chen, W., Chen, X., Weng, J., & Imran, M. (2020). An overview on smart contracts: Challenges, advances and platforms. Future Generation Computer Systems, 105, 475-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.12.019
  40. Tuncsiper, Z., Şanlısoy, S., & Aydın, Ü. (2025). Economic Transformation from Physical to Digital: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Metaverse Economy. Journal of Metaverse, 5(1), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.57019/jmv.1608255
  41. Kumar, S., Vivek, Y., Ravi, V., & Bose, I. (2025). A Comprehensive Review of Causal Inference in Banking, Finance, and Insurance. ACM Computing Surveys, 57(12), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3736752
  42. Bains, P., Ismail, A., Melo, F., & Sugimoto, N. (2022). Regulating the Crypto Ecosystem: The Case of Unbacked Crypto Assets. FinTech Notes, 2022(007), A001. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400221361.063.A001
  43. Copestake, A., Le, A., Papageorgiou, M. E., & Tan, B. (2023). Macro-Financial Implications of Foreign Crypto Assets for Small Developing Economies. Fintech Notes, 2023(012), A001. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400258367.063
  44. Şanlısoy, S., & Çiloğlu, T. (2023). A view of the future of the metaverse economy on the basis of the global financial system: new opportunities and risks. Journal of Corporate Governance, Insurance, and Risk Management, 10(1), 28-41. https://doi.org/10.56578/jcgirm100104
  45. Brenk, K., Tomini, N., Kanbach, D. K., Stubner, S., & Pinelli, M. (2025). From virtual vision to business reality: embracing the metaverse revolution. Review of Managerial Science, 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-025-00878-x
  46. Vidal-Tomás, D. (2023). The illusion of the metaverse and meta-economy. International Review of Financial Analysis, 86, 102560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102560
  47. Türkmen, N. C., & Sürmeli, D. (2024). The metaverse virtual economy: a comprehensive overview. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 13(4), 1320-1335. https://doi:10.33206/mjss.1350087
  48. Sonino, D. (2024). Metaverse Economics as a New Frontier for Digital Economies and Virtual Asset Management. Journal of Business and Future Economy, 1(3), 14-23. https://journals.iau.ae/index.php/JBFE/article/view/14
  49. Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Baabdullah, A. M., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Giannakis, M., Al-Debei, M. M.,. & Wamba, S. F. (2022). Metaverse beyond the hype: Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International journal of information management, 66, 102542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102542
  50. Wang, H., Ning, H., Lin, Y., Wang, W., Dhelim, S., Farha, F., Ding, J., & Daneshmand, M. (2023). A survey on the metaverse: The state-of-the-art, technologies, applications, and challenges. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 10(16), 14671-14688. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2023.3278329
  51. Liu, X., Muhammad, K., Lloret, J., Chen, Y. W., & Yuan, S. M. (2019). Elastic and cost-effective data carrier architecture for smart contract in blockchain. Future Generation Computer Systems, 100, 590-599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.05.042
  52. Lin, S. Y., Zhang, L., Li, J., Ji, L. L., & Sun, Y. (2022). A survey of application research based on blockchain smart contract. Wireless Networks, 28(2), 635-690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-021-02874-x
  53. Zaazaa, O., & El Bakkali, H. (2024). SmartLLMSentry: A Comprehensive LLM Based Smart Contract Vulnerability Detection Framework. Journal of Metaverse, 4(2), 126-137. https://doi.org/10.57019/jmv.1489060
  54. de Oliveira Rodrigues, D. E. F. (2024). Personhood global whispers: ethical echoes of decentralization?. Procedia Computer Science, 237, 767-774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.05.164
  55. Guan, M. Y., Yu, Y., Sharma, T., Huang, M. Z., Qin, K., Wang, Y., & Wang, K. Y. (2025, May). Security Perceptions of Users in Stablecoins: Advantages and Risks within the Cryptocurrency Ecosystem. In 2025 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) (pp. 2753-2771). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SP61157.2025.00042.
  56. Martínez Nadal, A. L. (2025). Stablecoins in the MiCA Regulation. In Governance and Control of Data and Digital Economy in the European Single Market: Legal Framework for New Digital Assets, Identities and Data Spaces (pp. 177-198). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-74889-9_8.
  57. Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA). Government welcomes passage of the Stablecoins Bill. Available at: https://www.hkma.gov.hk/eng/news-and-media/press-releases/2025/05/20250521-3/
  58. Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA). Consultation Paper on the Proposed AML/CFT Requirements for Regulated Stablecoin Activities. Available at: https://www.hkma.gov.hk/media/eng/regulatory-resources/consultations/20250526_Consultation_Paper_on_the_Proposed_AMLCFT_Req_for_Regulated_Stablecoin_Activities.pdf.
  59. Xu, J. (2022). Developments and implications of central bank digital currency: The case of China e‐CNY. Asian Economic Policy Review, 17(2), 235-250. https://doi.org/10.1111/aepr.12396
  60. European Commission. (2023, July 11). Towards the next technological transition: Commission presents EU strategy to lead on Web 4.0 and virtual worlds. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_3718
  61. Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Baabdullah, A. M., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Giannakis, M., Al-Debei, M. M.,. & Wamba, S. F. (2022). Metaverse beyond the hype: Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International journal of information management, 66, 102542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102542