Journals / Gülhane Tıp Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 3

A retrospective analysis of surgical approach to the mediastinal lesions

Pages
118–122
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Minimally invasive procedures can be used safely in the complete resection of selected mediastinal masses.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aims:The mediastinal masses represent a wide variety of diseases.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods:We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients between 2003 and 2018 who underwent surgical intervention for mediastinal masses.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Minimally invasive procedures can be used safely in the complete resection of selected mediastinal masses.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Aims:The mediastinal masses represent a wide variety of diseases. Most of the masses are detected incidentally. The patient’s symptoms usually occur as a result of compression or invasion of the surrounding tissue. In spite of difficult anatomic access for tumors of mediastinum, surgical resection remains the best diagnostic and therapeutic approach. In this study, we aimed to show the surgical modalities according to the mediastinal location and the changes in the surgical methods applied to the lesions with similar pathologies in time. Methods:We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients between 2003 and 2018 who underwent surgical intervention for mediastinal masses. A total of 241 patients included to the study. The age, sex, surgical methods, pathology results, localization of the masses, pathology results, surgical methods according to the localizations and changing of surgical methods applied to patients with the same regions and the same pathologies were examined in time. Results:Of the 241 patients, 69 (28.6%) were female and 172 (71.4%) were male. The lesions were located in the anterior mediastinum in 164 (68.1%) patients, in the middle mediastinum in 40 (16.6%) and in the posterior mediastinum in 37 (15.3%) of the patients. In the last 5 years, 69 (67%) of 103 patients had robotic surgery and 10 (9.7%) had sternotomy. Conclusions:Preoperative evaluation of mediastinal lesions should be performed carefully. The advantages of minimally invasive procedures should always be considered for selected patients. Minimally invasive procedures can be used safely in the complete resection of selected mediastinal masses.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAPMAZ, E., İNAN, M. Ş., IŞIK, H., KARATAŞ, O., KAVAKLI, K., GENÇ, O. (2019). A retrospective analysis of surgical approach to the mediastinal lesions. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 3, 118–122. https://ajindex.com/articles/161843

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Gun F, Erginel B, Nvar A. Mediastinal masses in children: Experience with 120 cases. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2012;29(2):141–147
  2. D’Andrilli A, Venuta F, Rendina EA. Surgical Approaches for Invasive Tumors of the Anterior Mediastinum. Thorac Surg Clin. 2010;20(2):265–284
  3. Kavakli K, Gürkök S, Sapmaz E, Karatas O, Gözübüyük A. Robotic approach to benign mediastinal lesions. Turkish J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;24(2):319–324
  4. Jurado J, Javidfar J, Newmark A, et al. Minimally invasive thymectomy and open thymectomy: Outcome analysis of 263 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94(3):974–982.
  5. Radkani P, Joshi D, Barot T, Williams R. Robotic video-assisted thoracoscopy: minimally invasive approach for management of mediastinal tumors. J Robot Surg. 2018;12(1):75–79
  6. Sarper A, Gürkök S, Özuslu BA, Genç O, Balkanlı K. Primer mediastinal kitleler: 64 olgunun analizi. Türk Göğüs Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2001;9(3):153–155
  7. Akal M, Özdemir N, Ökten İ YS. Mediastinal Kitleler (344 Olguluk Serinin Retrospektif Analizi). Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası. 1995;48(2):233–242
  8. Ayan E, Duran M. Mediastinal Kitleler: 27 Olgunun Değerlendirilmesi Özet. 2005;13(2):127–130
  9. Özgökçe M, Alper F, Aydin Y, Oğul H, Akgün M. Using cine magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate the degree of invasion in mediastinal masses. Turkish J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;23(2):309–315
  10. Yıldız D, Türüt H, Sırmalı M, et al. Mediastinal kitlelerde cerrahi yaklaşım: 142 olgunun değerlendirilmesi. SDÜ Tıp Fakültesi Derg. 2009;12(1):5–9
  11. Sarkaria IS, Bains MS, Sood S, et al. Resection of primary mediastinal non-seminomatous germ cell tumors: A 28-year experi- ence at memorial sloan-kettering cancer center. J Tho- rac Oncol. 2011;6(7):1236–1241
  12. Yim APC. Video-assisted thoracoscopic management of anterior mediastinal masses. Surg Endosc. 1995;9:1184–1188
  13. Weksler B, Tavares J, Newhook TE, Greenleaf CE, Diehl JT. Robot-assisted thymectomy is superior to transsternal thymectomy. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(1):261–216.