Journals / GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine / 2019 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1

Uterine Arteriovenous Malformation

Pages
59–61
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Uterine arteriovenous malformation is commonly diagnosed in women of childbearing age, angiographic em- bolization should be the firstly preferred treatment.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We aimed to report a case of uterine arteriovenous malformation which was successfully treated by uter- ine artery embolization.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A multiparous 23-year-old woman referred to our clinic for 7 weeks of scar pregnancy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Uterine arteriovenous malformation is commonly diagnosed in women of childbearing age, angiographic em- bolization should be the firstly preferred treatment.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

We aimed to report a case of uterine arteriovenous malformation which was successfully treated by uter- ine artery embolization. A multiparous 23-year-old woman referred to our clinic for 7 weeks of scar pregnancy. On ultrasound, incisional 32×37 mm gestational sac surrounded with non-pulsatile high flow vessels was demonstrated. Uterine artery embolization was performed with Gelfoam by interventional radiology. The post-em- bolization arteriogram showed complete embolization of the uterine arteriovenous malformation with a slow flow of contrast in both uterine arteries. In clinical suspicion, uterine arteriovenous malformation can be diagnosed with Doppler ultrasonogra- phy and can be treated successfully with either uterine artery embolization or uterine surgery. Uterine arteriovenous malformation is commonly diagnosed in women of childbearing age, angiographic em- bolization should be the firstly preferred treatment.

🔖

Cite This Article

OĞUZ, Y., ELDEM, F. G., ÇİL, B., SANHAL, C., TÜRKMEN, G. G., YÜCEL, A., UYGUR, D. (2019). Uterine Arteriovenous Malformation. GORM:Gynecology Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1, 59–61. https://ajindex.com/articles/161818

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Schiller VL, Raft E, Linden R. Uterine arteriovenous mal- formation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170(1):219-20.
  2. Polat P, Suma S, Kantarcý M, Alper F, Levent A. Colour doppler ultrasound in the evaluation of uterine vascular abnormalities. Radiographics. 2002;22(1):47-53.
  3. Huang MW, Muradali D, Thurston WA, Burns PN, Wilson SR. Uterine arteriovenous malformations: gray-scale and doppler ultrasound features with MR imaging correlation. Radiology. 1998;206(1):115-23.
  4. Elia G, Counsell C, Singer SJ. Uterine artery malforma- tion as a hidden cause of severe uterine bleeding. J Reprod Med. 2001;46(4):398-400.
  5. Delotte J, Chevallier P, Benoit B, Castillon JM, Bongain A. Pregnancy after embolization therapy for uterine arte- riovenous malformation. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(1):228. Valsky DV, Hamani Y, Verstandig A, Yagel S. The use of 3D rendering, VCI-C, 3D power Doppler and B-flow in the evaluation of interstitial pregnancy with arteriovenous malformation treated by selective uterine artery emboliza- tion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29(3):352-5.
  6. Kochhar PK, Sarangal M, Gupta U. Conservative man- agement of cesarean scar pregnancy with uterine arteri- ovenous malformation: a case report. J Reprod Med. 2013;58(1-2):81-4.
  7. Bhoil R, Raghuvanshi V, Basavaiah S. A case of congeni- tal uterine arterio-venous malformation managed by hys- terectomy. Pol J Radiol. 2015;(80):202-5. Rosa E Silva JC, de Aguiar FM, de Sá Rosa E Silva AC, Candido Dos Reis FJ, Poli Neto OB, Nogueira AA. Conservative management of large uterine arteriovenous malformation: case report. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(6):2406- 7. Kido A, Togashi K, Koyama T, Ito H, Tatsumi K, Fujii S, et al. Retained products of conception masquerading as acquired arteriovenous malformation. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2003;27(1):88-92.