Journals / İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1

Predictive Power of Humor Types in Explaining Leadership Styles in Different Organizations

Pages
921–937
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It can be argued that most of the subordinates in the organizations where the managers are appointed believes that their managers have the qualities of a transactional leader.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose – Humor could act as a therapeutic agent for the employees by creating an entertaining environment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is also considered as a valuable administrative tool to increase production and workers’ productivity.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It can be argued that most of the subordinates in the organizations where the managers are appointed believes that their managers have the qualities of a transactional leader.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Purpose – Humor could act as a therapeutic agent for the employees by creating an entertaining environment. It is also considered as a valuable administrative tool to increase production and workers’ productivity. Leadership, on the other hand, is an important component of all kinds of organizations. Humor and leadership have been studied extensively in a variety of contexts. Although the relationship between humor types and leadership styles has become a topic of interest for the researchers, the predictive power of humor types in explaining leadership styles has not been studied. The aim of this study is to find out whether the subordinates’ views regarding the type of their leaders differ and the type of humor predict leadership style of the managers. Design/methodology/approach – The study employed survey research design. To this end, 225 subordinates working at different organizations in a city located in Black Sea Region, Turkey participated in the study. In order to collect data Leadership Style Scale and Humor Behavior Scale were used. Findings – The findings of the study revealed that the subordinates working for different institutions mostly think that their managers are transactional leaders. In addition, the results of hierarchical multiple regression analysis indicated that humor types predict leadership styles at different levels. Discussion – The results of this study revealed that leadership styles differ depending on the type of organization. It can be argued that most of the subordinates in the organizations where the managers are appointed believes that their managers have the qualities of a transactional leader.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERGÜN, M., AKCAOĞLU, M. Ö. (2020). Predictive Power of Humor Types in Explaining Leadership Styles in Different Organizations. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1, 921–937. https://ajindex.com/articles/161667

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Abel, M. H. (2002). Humor, stress, and coping strategies. Humor–International Journal of Humor Research, 15(4), 365-381.
  2. Akiş, Y., T., (2004). Türkiye’nin gerçek liderlik haritası. İstanbul:
  3. Alfa Basım Yayım Dağıtım Ltd. Akman, V., Hanoglu, M., & Kızıl, C. (2015). Liderlik ile personel performansı arasındaki ilişki üzerine bir şirket incelemesi. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 14(52), 130-145.
  4. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. New York: Westview Press.
  5. Amanchukwu, R. N., Stanley, G. J., & Ololube, N. P. (2015). A review of leadership theories, principles and styles and their relevance to educational management. Management, 5(1), 6-14.
  6. Arendt, L. A. (2009). Transformational leadership and follower creativity: The moderating effect of leader humor. Review of Business Research, 9(4), 100-106.
  7. Avolio, B. J., Howell, J. M., & Sosik, J. J. (1999). A funny thing happened on the way to the bottom line: Humor as a moderator of leadership style effects. Academy of management journal, 42(2), 219-227.
  8. Aycan, Z. 2006. Paternalism: Towards conceptual refinement and operationalization. In K. S. Yang, K. K. Hwang, & U. Kim (Eds.), Scientific advances in indigenous psychologies: Empirical, philosophical, and cultural contributions: 445-466. London: Sage Ltd. Bakan, İ., Erşahan, B., Büyükbeşe, T., Doğan, İ. F., & İlker, K. (2015). Dönüşümcü ve etkileşimci liderlik ile öğretmenlerin tükenmişlik düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 7(14), 201-222.
  9. Bass, B. (1998). Transformational leadership: Individual, military and educational impact. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ. Bass, B. M., & Stogdill, R. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill's handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. New York: Free Press.
  10. Bertocci, D. I. (2009). Leadership in organizations: There is a difference between leaders and managers. Plymouth: University Press of America. Bowers, J. D. (2015). Leading versus Managing. Law Prac., 41, 6. Briton, N. J., & Hall, J. A. (1995). Beliefs about female and male nonverbal communication. Sex Roles, 32(1), 79- 90. Bulmer, M. G. (2012). Principles of statistics. Dover: Courier Corporation. Cansoy, R., & Polatcan, M. (2018). Examination of instructional leadership research in Turkey. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(1), 276-291.
  11. Carless, S. A., Wearing, A. J., & Mann, L. (2000). A short measure of transformational leadership. Journal of business and psychology,